[Issue 6617] Two problems using enum lenghs
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sun Dec 2 10:33:00 PST 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6617
bearophile_hugs at eml.cc changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc 2012-12-02 10:32:59 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > This is a bug report. I have found two different problems while creating a
> > fixed-sized array as long as the number members of an enum (DMD 2.055beta3)
>
> All of these now work.
Right, I close this bug report. Issue 4997 covers the enhancement request.
> The problem with this is that lookups also go to the base type of the enum, so:
>
> struct T
> {
> @property static size_t length() { return 0; }
> }
>
> enum Foo : T { a = T() }
>
> void main()
> {
> assert(Foo.length == 1); // fails
> }
Enums already have some built-in attributes, that cause some troubles. In
Issue 4997 I have suggested a namespace named "meta", so you write
"MyEnum.meta.length". But then a problem is that MyEnum.meta.max breaks the
convention that D integral types have a "max" attribute.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list