The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

December 2012 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Dec 1 00:12:49 PST 2012
Ending: Mon Dec 31 20:57:57 PST 2012
Messages: 1095

• [Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8349] CTFE memcpy Error with ctRegex   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9092] GC.extend allocates less then it reports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9101] New: template mixin constructor causes link error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9101] template mixin constructor causes link error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9101] template mixin constructor causes link error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9101] template mixin constructor causes link error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9101] template mixin constructor causes link error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9101] template mixin constructor causes link error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9101] template mixin constructor causes link error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9101] template mixin constructor causes link error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2630] ddoc should be able to document unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2630] ddoc should be able to document unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1369] Unable to find 'this' in __traits(getMember)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1986] Mixin code from website doesn't compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2042] Nav bar on left is incorrect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2119] Please provide example of interfacing to C struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2444] structs should allow calling the normal blitting function when overriding opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2461] Duplicate typedef (with different initializer) in module has wrong value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2445] D2 std.demangle example doesn't compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2801] std.typecons.Unique does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8085] std.algorithm.joiner makes invalid assumptions about front()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9093] Overloads in extern(C++) interfaces throw up COMDAT errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9102] New: OutputRange should be ref parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9103] New: find should work with multiple needles which are elements rather than ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9103] find should work with multiple needles which are elements rather than ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9103] find should work with multiple needles which are elements rather than ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9103] find should work with multiple needles which are elements rather than ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9103] find should work with multiple needles which are elements rather than ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8628] IntegerExp::toInteger(): Assertion `0' failed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2445] D2 std.demangle example doesn't compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2445] D2 std.demangle example doesn't compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2825] Guideline for semianonymous structs and unions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5714] case ranges in final switches   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5714] case ranges in final switches   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8289] Cannot declare functions returning anonymous enum if they have 'in' block.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5714] case ranges in final switches   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2825] Guideline for semianonymous structs and unions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2825] Guideline for semianonymous structs and unions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7656] ddoc misinterprets commented parentheses in an example   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7715] DDoc eats $1, $2, $3 etc. inside d_code section   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9098] Error with ddoc: octal digit expected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9098] Error with ddoc: octal digit expected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9089] Very restrictive Tuple constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6614] std.traits should have an isFinal template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6614] std.traits should have an isFinal template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6617] Two problems using enum lenghs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6841] writeln problem with array of tuples   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6570] 'this' silently passes from one object to another   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6617] Two problems using enum lenghs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6797] Fake changes to enum array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6617] Two problems using enum lenghs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6893] Write of enum member represented with ubyte or ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6617] Two problems using enum lenghs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7458] documentation claims non-existent limitation of nested aggregate member functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7513] [TDPL] opAssign examples don't work as described   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9069] struct literals are treated as lvalues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7627] std.traits.isMutable is undocumented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8050] std.traits.isMutable ddocs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7673] Static variables do not allow implicit call to ctor via assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7019] implicit constructors are inconsistently allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7238] Windows installer doesn't install dmd 2.057   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7291] UFCS doesn't work for static member functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9104] New: No line number with private name found by "did you mean"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9104] No line number with private name found by "did you mean"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9104] No line number with private name found by "did you mean"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9105] New: alias to refer to instance.attribute   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9105] alias to refer to instance.attribute   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6842] Can't use alias of instance member   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8051] alias member not accessible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6842] Can't use alias of instance member   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6619] Forward a single field to a subfield, like "alias this"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6842] Can't use alias of instance member   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9106] New: Rename std.random.randomShuffle as std.random.shuffle   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9106] Rename std.random.randomShuffle as std.random.shuffle   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9106] Rename std.random.randomShuffle as std.random.shuffle   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7797] std.typelist missing from documentation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7447] Alias template within struct/class not visible when struct/class is accessed through an alias   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7956] Missing error line number with wrong function name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7956] Missing error line number with wrong function name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7956] Missing error line number with wrong function name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9107] New: Value Range Analysis with uint and byte   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9108] New: Running dmd generates an error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9108] Running dmd generates an error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7614] Spec says pragma(msg) only accepts strings, but it accepts anything   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7614] Spec says pragma(msg) only accepts strings, but it accepts anything   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9109] New: Regression: 2.053: Lazy Variadic Functions do not work with delegates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9109] Regression: 2.053: Lazy Variadic Functions do not work with delegates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9109] Regression: 2.053: Lazy Variadic Functions do not work with delegates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8802] Problem with enums of void*   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7830] public import is not fully documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9110] New: Escaping reference error from lazy variadic parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7830] public import is not fully documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8802] Problem with enums of void*   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6570] 'this' silently passes from one object to another   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6841] writeln problem with array of tuples   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2486] taking address of slice rvalue is valid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9111] New: Parent object getting GCed before the elements of child dynamic array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9111] Parent object getting GCed before the elements of child dynamic array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8568] compile time access of associative array keys results in segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7602] [CTFE] Segmentation fault when using array.keys on a null AA   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9077] Struct copy constructor ignored when opAssign with a different type is present   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9092] GC.extend allocates less then it reports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9092] GC.extend allocates less then it reports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9077] Struct copy constructor ignored when opAssign with a different type is present   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9069] struct literals are treated as lvalues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9077] Struct copy constructor ignored when opAssign with a different type is present   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9076] Aliased template function and property resolution doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8819] void static array should have init built-in propert   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9070] nothrow of constructer/destructor isn't correct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8819] void static array should have init built-in propert   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9112] New: Uniform default construction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform default construction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform default construction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform default construction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform default construction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform default construction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform default construction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform default construction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform construction for built-in types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform construction for built-in types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform construction for built-in types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform construction for built-in types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform construction for built-in types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform construction for built-in types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform construction for built-in types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform construction for built-in types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform construction for built-in types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform construction for built-in types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform construction for built-in types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9112] Uniform construction for built-in types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9036] postblit is called for nested structs when assigning `init`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9035] Nested struct `init` is lvalue and can be modified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9069] struct literals are treated as lvalues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8408] Purity calculation should be improved   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9069] struct literals are treated as lvalues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9035] Nested struct `init` is lvalue and can be modified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7890] [CTFE] - segfault for struct literal with AA field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7602] [CTFE] Segmentation fault when using array.keys on a null AA   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7890] [CTFE] - segfault for struct literal with AA field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8819] void static array should have init built-in propert   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7602] [CTFE] Segmentation fault when using array.keys on a null AA   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9035] Nested struct `init` is lvalue and can be modified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9036] postblit is called for nested structs when assigning `init`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5679] Type aliasing "this" from an access function defined in base class confuses the compiler about the type of objects   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9076] Aliased template function and property resolution doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9070] nothrow of constructer/destructor isn't correct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7890] [CTFE] - segfault for struct literal with AA field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7602] [CTFE] Segmentation fault when using array.keys on a null AA   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9113] New: ICE(interpret.c): CTFE assignment to member of struct in union   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9113] ICE(interpret.c): CTFE assignment to member of struct in union   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9113] ICE(interpret.c): CTFE assignment to member of struct in union   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9113] ICE(interpret.c): CTFE assignment to member of struct in union   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9113] ICE(interpret.c): CTFE assignment to member of struct in union   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9114] New: Can't call varadic template function with partly specified template parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9115] New: Internal error when compiling core.simd float4 expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8408] Purity calculation should be improved   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7790] [CTFE] assignment to AA apply ref argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3091] "auto x = new shared foo" does not compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7656] ddoc misinterprets commented parentheses in an example   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7715] DDoc eats $1, $2, $3 etc. inside d_code section   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9116] New: Redundant field postblit call on initializing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9116] Redundant field postblit call on initializing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9116] Redundant field postblit call on initializing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9116] Redundant field postblit call on initializing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1951] Remove SFINAE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7790] [CTFE] assignment to AA apply ref argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7715] DDoc eats $1, $2, $3 etc. inside d_code section   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9117] New: format fails if opCast and this alias are both defined in an aliased struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9117] format fails if opCast and this alias are both defined in an aliased struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9117] format fails if opCast and this alias are both defined in an aliased struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9117] format fails if opCast and this alias are both defined in an aliased struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7790] [CTFE] assignment to AA apply ref argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9118] New: typo in github tools repo   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9119] New: Forward range addition to associative arrays.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9119] Forward range addition to associative arrays.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9120] New: Uniform construction for array types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9120] Uniform construction for array types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9120] Uniform construction for array types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5075] std.algorithm.map/filter don't support associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8408] Purity calculation should be improved   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6937] new with struct doesn't allow field assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6937] new with struct doesn't allow field assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8408] Purity calculation should be improved   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6937] new with struct doesn't allow field assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6937] new with struct doesn't allow field assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6937] new with struct doesn't allow field assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2486] taking address of slice rvalue is valid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9121] New: Templated getters/setter for properties collision   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9122] New: std.concurrency send() fails with multiple arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9090] auto ref doesn't work with arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8783] ref foreach update of const fixed size arrays in constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8783] ref foreach update of const fixed size arrays in constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8783] ref foreach update of const fixed size arrays in constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9090] auto ref doesn't work with arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9090] auto ref doesn't work with arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2950] Switch for enum : string fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4779] www.d-programming-language.org "Interfacing to C" should make clear how to do callbacks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4779] www.d-programming-language.org "Interfacing to C" should make clear how to do callbacks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9125] New: mixin + textual import = order of declaration dependence   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9125] mixin + textual import = order of declaration dependence   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9125] mixin + textual import = order of declaration dependence   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8116] new Foo().bar() should work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8635] Allow postfix expressions for new   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5625] std.format unittest disabled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9126] New: parse!int fails on size_t.max+1 digits long input (overflow)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9126] parse!int fails on size_t.max+1 digits long input (overflow)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9126] parse!int fails on size_t.max+1 digits long input (overflow)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9126] parse!int fails on size_t.max+1 digits long input (overflow)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9127] New: Error on getting `stringof` on field with body-less interface type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9127] Error on getting `stringof` on field with body-less interface type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5372] rpm dmd.conf is old   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5210] PATCH: minor changes to allow compiling with Visual C++ 2008   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4812] Basic template syntax is rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5166] about D's template enhancement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4906] Dereferencing null error in a single expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9128] New: Better error message for method-level/instance-level name confusions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9128] Better error message for method-level/instance-level name confusions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9128] Better error message for method-level/instance-level name confusions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6373] More descriptive 'hidden by X is deprecated' error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6373] More descriptive 'hidden by X is deprecated' error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6373] More descriptive 'hidden by X is deprecated' error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5502] More handy ways to create associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9129] New: Definite return analysis fails for nested case statements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9091] Using __traits(getMember) on template argument fails inside member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9083] mixin expression on template argument doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9100] Weird behavior on template instance argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9100] Weird behavior on template instance argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9093] Overloads in extern(C++) interfaces throw up COMDAT errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9100] Weird behavior on template instance argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9130] New: Wrong codegen for comile time constructed struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9130] Wrong codegen for compile time constructed struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9130] Wrong codegen for compile time constructed struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9090] auto ref doesn't work with arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9131] New: Invalid UTF-8 when using std.algorithm.equal with dstring and string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9131] Invalid UTF-8 when using std.algorithm.equal with dstring and string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9131] Invalid UTF-8 when using std.algorithm.equal with dstring and string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9131] Invalid UTF-8 when using std.algorithm.equal with dstring and string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9131] Invalid UTF-8 when using std.algorithm.equal with dstring and string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8988] Segfault with circular derived class template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9132] New: Unhelpful error message when calling non-const property from const method.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9132] Unhelpful error message when calling non-const property from const method.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9132] Unhelpful error message when calling non-const property from const method.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9132] Unhelpful error message when calling non-const property from const method.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9133] New: std.datetime: Cannot implicitly convert const(SysTime) to SysTime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9133] std.datetime: Cannot implicitly convert const(SysTime) to SysTime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9134] New: failed assert leads to Segmentation fault when iterating file lines   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9134] failed assert leads to Segmentation fault when iterating file lines   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8988] Segfault with circular derived class template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9057] Regression(Beta): Segfault or "Non-constant expression" error with local import   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9057] Regression(Beta): Segfault or "Non-constant expression" error with local import   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8894] 2.059: Lookup error message has become uninformative   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9135] New: a bug which compile does not end   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6296] ICE(glue.c): invalid template instantiated in is(typeof()).   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6707] Error message for mismatch of const/non-const property functions needs to improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8894] 2.059: Lookup error message has become uninformative   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9136] New: Add isNested trait   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9136] Add isNested trait   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4489] std.array.insert is slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9137] New: A function that equals to "out of scope" action for manual lifetime management   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9137] A function that equals to "out of scope" action for manual lifetime management   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9138] New: Code optimization results in a wrong value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9138] Code optimization results in a wrong value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9138] Code optimization results in a wrong value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9139] New: `destroy` is dangerous and inconsistent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9139] `destroy` is dangerous and inconsistent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6296] ICE(glue.c): invalid template instantiated in is(typeof()).   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7716] Add an indexed overload to countUntil   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7298] global static function and delegate literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7716] Add an indexed overload to countUntil   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6099] std.windows.registry exposes too much implementation details   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5877] Cannot treat '__traits(parent, obj)' as a type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7804] Cannot alias __traits directly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8894] 2.059: Lookup error message has become uninformative   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8894] 2.059: Lookup error message has become uninformative   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8408] Purity calculation should be improved   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8408] Purity calculation should be improved   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8408] Purity calculation should be improved   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8908] Collapse of std.csv by the specifications change of std.conv.parse   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8408] Purity calculation should be improved   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9140] New: ref foreach of immutables in postcondition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9140] ref foreach of immutables in postcondition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9140] ref foreach of immutables in postcondition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9140] ref foreach of immutables in postcondition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9140] ref foreach of immutables in postcondition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9140] ref foreach of immutables in postcondition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9058] Problem with std.traits.EnumMembers conversion to array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4489] std.array.insert is slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9141] New: Incorrect "more initializers than fields" error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9141] (D1 only) Incorrect "more initializers than fields" error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9141] (D1 only) Incorrect "more initializers than fields" error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8796] Optimizer bug on 64bit: *p++=1 where p is a parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8796] Optimizer bug on 64bit: *p++=1 where p is a parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8796] Optimizer bug on 64bit: *p++=1 where p is a parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4489] std.array.insert is slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5850] Default arguments of out and ref arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7603] Default initializer for ref/out must be an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7716] Add an indexed overload to countUntil   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7602] [CTFE] Segmentation fault when using array.keys on a null AA   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9058] Problem with std.traits.EnumMembers conversion to array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9142] New: Segmentation fault (DMD only) when calling some external functions twice in one expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9142] Segmentation fault (DMD only) when calling some external functions twice in one expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9142] Segmentation fault (DMD only) when calling some external functions twice in one expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9143] New: template structs with two bool parameters confuse DMD   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9143] template structs with two parameters confuse DMD on multiple instantiations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9143] template structs with two parameters confuse DMD on multiple instantiations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9143] template structs with two parameters confuse DMD on multiple instantiations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9143] template structs with two parameters confuse DMD on multiple instantiations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9058] Problem with std.traits.EnumMembers conversion to array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9144] New: synchronized CRITSECSIZE should be a target constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9144] synchronized CRITSECSIZE should be a target constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9144] synchronized CRITSECSIZE should be a target constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9124] New: Object variable of variadic template struct needs explicit "this" in certain situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9124] Object variable of variadic template struct needs explicit "this" in certain situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9124] Object variable of variadic template struct needs explicit "this" in certain situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9124] Object variable of variadic template struct needs explicit "this" in certain situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9124] Object variable of variadic template struct needs explicit "this" in certain situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9124] Object variable of variadic template struct needs explicit "this" in certain situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9124] Object variable of variadic template struct needs explicit "this" in certain situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6627] BigInt textual representation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9052] [2.061 alpha] AA.length in a const context tries to call opAssign + no error line number   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9052] [2.061 alpha] AA.length in a const context tries to call opAssign + no error line number   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9060] std.range.chain and std.range.zip cannot get frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6395] ICE(glue.c) Multiple-at-a-time bug breaking e.g. DustMite   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8678] Wrong processing of Complex!double as function argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7845] ICE(cgcs.c) 354   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2962] ICE(glue.c) or bad codegen passing variable as template value parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9145] New: File is not opened if 'File' constructor is called in 'with' statement expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8805] corrupt data at compile time.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7810] [CTFE] Typesafe variadic function with array of structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE(glue.c): 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6395] ICE(glue.c) Multiple-at-a-time bug breaking e.g. DustMite   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE(glue.c): 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE(glue.c): 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE(glue.c): 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE(glue.c): 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6436] Refcounted initialization bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6635] std.conv.emplace: enforcement is too weak   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8902] Unexpected "duplicate union initialization for X" error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE(glue.c): 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5010] Error messages for properties could be improved   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8783] ref foreach update of const fixed size arrays in constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE(glue.c): 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE(glue.c): 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8512] Nasty bug about template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE(glue.c): 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE(glue.c): 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE(glue.c): 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4816] template constraint and __traits(compiles, ...) don't work properly together with a delegate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6967] template instantiation depends an pragma(msg, T.stringof) if __traits is used   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9146] New: Errors in gagged forward reference declarations are detected too late.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4269] Regression(2.031): invalid type accepted if evaluated while errors are gagged   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8715] map, filter, zip with functional arrays/associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6883] Array static bounds tests with $ too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9147] New: Implicit conversion to struct with alias this does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9148] New: 'pure' is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9149] New: 'const' is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8902] Unexpected "duplicate union initialization for X" error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6883] Array static bounds tests with $ too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6883] Array static bounds tests with $ too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4269] Regression(2.031): invalid type accepted if evaluated while errors are gagged   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9150] New: Mismatching static array length should be detected in foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9150] Mismatching static array length should be detected in foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9150] Mismatching static array length should be detected in foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9150] Mismatching static array length should be detected in foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6883] Array static bounds tests with $ too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4489] std.array.insert is slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8900] Using zip with char[] sometimes fails to compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4489] std.array.insert is slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9151] New: opCast makes "this" alias ineffective   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9151] opCast makes "this" alias ineffective   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9151] opCast makes "this" alias ineffective   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9151] opCast makes "this" alias ineffective   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9152] New: Regression in type inference of array of delegates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9152] Regression in type inference of array of delegates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9084] Structs assignment and associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE(glue.c): 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9153] New: Type inference for array of delegates should not break based on order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9153] Type inference for array of delegates should not break based on order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9153] Type inference for array of delegates should not break based on order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9153] Type inference for array of delegates should not break based on order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4584] std.algorithm.sort fails with SwapStrategy.stable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9154] New: Incorrectly generated assignment operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9154] Incorrectly generated assignment operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9154] Incorrectly generated assignment operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9154] Incorrectly generated assignment operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9154] Incorrectly generated assignment operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9154] Incorrectly generated assignment operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9154] Incorrectly generated assignment operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7459] working around nested function declaration order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9037] DDoc: Chokes on consecutive example sections:   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9155] New: Ddoc: code section should strip leading spaces   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9155] Ddoc: code section should strip leading spaces   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7459] working around nested function declaration order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7459] working around nested function declaration order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9156] New: std.complex inconsistency between `std.complex.Complex` vs `std.complex.complex`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9156] std.complex inconsistency between `std.complex.Complex` vs `std.complex.complex`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9156] std.complex inconsistency between `std.complex.Complex` vs `std.complex.complex`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5204] Inherited out contract requires lvalue result?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9037] DDoc: Chokes on consecutive example sections:   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9157] New: RDMD: Add support for the Unilink linker   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9157] RDMD: Add support for the Unilink linker   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8443] [2.060 beta] Win32 linker bug with separate compilation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5754] ICE(glue.c): using nested delegate literal as template alias parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5754] ICE(glue.c): using nested delegate literal as template alias parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9158] New: [ICE](glue.c line 787) with reduce from another module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9159] New: Variable and function name are the same in mixin template can't be compiled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9159] Variable and function name are the same in mixin template can't be compiled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9159] Variable and function name are the same in mixin template can't be compiled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9159] Variable and function name are the same in mixin template can't be compiled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9160] New: 2.061alpha multiSort no longer working with L-value only comparators   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9160] 2.061alpha multiSort no longer working with L-value only comparators   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9160] 2.061alpha multiSort no longer working with L-value only comparators   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9160] 2.061alpha multiSort no longer working with L-value only comparators   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5204] Inherited out contract requires lvalue result?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9161] New: Linker error on linux if struct has @disabled ~this();   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9161] Linker error on linux if struct has @disabled ~this();   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9161] Linker error on linux if struct has @disabled ~this();   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9162] New: [tdpl] Non-static structs should have access to outer lexical scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9162] [tdpl] Non-static structs should have access to outer lexical scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9162] [tdpl] Non-static structs should have access to outer lexical scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9162] [tdpl] Non-static structs should have access to outer lexical scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9162] [tdpl] Non-static structs should have access to outer lexical scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9162] [tdpl] Non-static structs should have access to outer lexical scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9162] [tdpl] Non-static structs should have access to outer lexical scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8443] [2.060 beta] Win32 linker bug with separate compilation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9163] New: std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9163] std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9163] std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9163] std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9163] std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9163] std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9163] std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9163] std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9163] std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9163] std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9163] std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9163] std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9163] std.parallelism broken with extensive optimizations (gdc)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9164] New: Can't easily assign one Nullable to another   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9164] Can't easily assign one Nullable to another   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9164] Can't easily assign one Nullable to another   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9165] New: Auto conversion from dynamic array to fixed size array at return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8752] Unsafe use of T.init should be allowed in @system function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9166] New: std.typecons.Nullable doesn't work with a not mutable type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9166] std.typecons.Nullable doesn't work with a not mutable type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9166] std.typecons.Nullable and NullableRef don't work with a not mutable type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9167] New: A failed inlining of inner function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9168] New: AA.length is impure and unsafe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9168] AA.length is impure and unsafe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9168] AA.length is impure and unsafe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8556] Using take results in a corrupted call to opSlice   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8804] countUntil warning on an infinite range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8841] Missing line numbers in stack trace?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8821] countUntil chokes on reference ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8705] std.conv.to bug, from documentation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8841] Missing line numbers in stack trace?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9169] New: semantic order difference in variable declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9169] semantic order difference in variable declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8651] Slice op Slice throws exceptions (not errors), and nothrow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8934] Lambda violates DMD assertion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4616] Link error with copy constructor of nested struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9170] New: CTFE: Allow reinterpret casts float <-> int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9170] CTFE: Allow reinterpret casts float <-> int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9170] CTFE: Allow reinterpret casts float <-> int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9171] New: error optimization of expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9171] error optimization of expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9171] error optimization of expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9171] error optimization of expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9171] error optimization of expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9171] error optimization of expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9171] error optimization of expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9171] error optimization of expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9171] error optimization of expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9069] struct literals are treated as lvalues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9063] static assert should resolve property function call   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8085] std.algorithm.joiner makes invalid assumptions about front()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8085] std.algorithm.joiner makes invalid assumptions about front()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9172] New: strange shadowing declaration check   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9172] strange shadowing declaration check   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9172] strange shadowing declaration check   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9172] strange shadowing declaration check   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9173] New: std.string.wrap should conform to Unicode line-breaking algorithm   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8984] Dynamic array key for associative array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6210] Associative array with array key often cannot be equated.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7371] Associative arrays as associative array keys   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8984] Dynamic array key for associative array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9174] New: [ICE](cast.c line 2463) with ternary operator with mixed alias this types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9060] std.range.chain and std.range.zip cannot get frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9060] std.range.chain and std.range.zip cannot get frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7177] $ should forward to length by default   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8847] voldemort + inout confuses "is"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9175] New: std.algorithm.remove!(predicate) problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8847] voldemort + inout confuses "is"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8556] Using take results in a corrupted call to opSlice   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8913] Wrong code in IfStatement condition Expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5589] Incorrect definitions in core.stdc.locale (Windows)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9176] New: Incorrect gagging of fwdref error in alias this semantics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9176] Incorrect gagging of fwdref error in alias this semantics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9176] Incorrect gagging of fwdref error in alias this semantics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9176] Incorrect gagging of fwdref error in alias this semantics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9177] New: Wrong `alias func this` incorrectly reports error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9177] Wrong `alias func this` incorrectly reports error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9177] Wrong `alias func this` incorrectly reports error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9177] Wrong `alias func this` incorrectly reports error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9177] Wrong `alias func this` incorrectly reports error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9177] Wrong `alias func this` incorrectly reports error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8556] Using take results in a corrupted call to opSlice   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8556] Using take results in a corrupted call to opSlice   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5559] A static down cast in Phobos   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5622] [qtd] Static members imported with "alias this" are inaccessible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9178] New: UDA: getAttributes does not play well with topleof   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5539] Statically disallow unsigned<0 test   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9179] New: Invalid template instantiation attempt should result in a readable error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5559] A static down cast in Phobos   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5559] A static down cast in Phobos   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5308] std.conv should also use a to function to convert to other class types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5324] Site docs doesn't mention .length property of std.typecons.Tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 194] DDoc: method-attributes ignored within templated class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5243] dmd -run potentially removes user files   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5223] [qtd] Cannot use default value with function parameter of struct type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5158] Allow operator overloading on non-type template instances   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5115] std.typecons.scoped problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5061] std.traits.arrayTarget   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5030] Operators don't work with AssociativeArray!(T1,T2)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9180] New: can't compile example code on dlang.org   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9180] can't compile example code on dlang.org   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9180] can't compile example code on dlang.org   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9180] can't compile example code on dlang.org   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9180] can't compile example code on dlang.org   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9086] std.typecons.appendIfNotNull() or a better idea   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5559] A static down cast in Phobos   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8908] Collapse of std.csv by the specifications change of std.conv.parse   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5375] Detection of cyclic module imports provides error findings on console, instead of exception msg   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5385] DMD doesn't block access to "static package" members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5589] Incorrect definitions in core.stdc.locale (Windows)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8908] Collapse of std.csv by the specifications change of std.conv.parse   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5555] Built-in associative arrays in pure nothrow functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6357] Almost all AA methods are not pure/nothrow/@safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9181] New: Forward reference error in struct static fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9182] New: [ICE](glue.c line 1235) With static struct fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5375] Detection of cyclic module imports provides error findings on console, instead of exception msg   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7803] Regression(2.054) scope(success) in nothrow/@safe functions causes compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9183] New: Add a Nullable.get(x) overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5385] DMD doesn't block access to "static package" members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5385] DMD doesn't block access to "static package" members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1161] [module] Access to private static members is allowed from other module.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5824] Linking of objs containing mixin and function literal fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1161] [module] Access to private static members is allowed from other module.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9184] New: std.algorithm.all fails to compile when providing a lambda   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4479] Module Foo is in multiple files Foo   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7292] Exception and Error missing from object docs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6057] Problem with defining enum in function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9046] typeof(T.init) should have the type T   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9185] New: Add note about where -op is useful   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9185] Add note about where -op is useful   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7803] Regression(2.054) scope(success) in nothrow/@safe functions causes compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9186] New: Manifest constant can violate const correctness restrictions when empty   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9186] Manifest constant can violate const correctness restrictions when empty   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9186] Manifest constant can violate const correctness restrictions when empty   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9186] Manifest constant can violate const correctness restrictions when empty   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9186] Manifest constant can violate const correctness restrictions when empty   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9186] Manifest constant can violate const correctness restrictions when empty   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8622] Allow labeled breaks to work on *any* block   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9187] New: -inline doesn't work with nested lambda functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5115] std.typecons.scoped problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7803] Regression(2.054) scope(success) in nothrow/@safe functions causes compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7803] Regression(2.054) scope(success) in nothrow/@safe functions causes compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8061] std.algorithm.joiner breaks when used with InputRangeObject   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9188] New: [meta] A huge D1 codebase doesn't compile since dmd 1.067   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9188] [meta] A huge D1 codebase doesn't compile since dmd 1.067   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9188] [meta] A huge D1 codebase doesn't compile since dmd 1.067   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9188] [meta] A huge D1 codebase doesn't compile since dmd 1.067   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9188] [meta] A huge D1 codebase doesn't compile since dmd 1.067   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9189] New: (D1 only) ICE on simple valid code since dmd 1.074   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9189] (D1 only) ICE on simple valid code since dmd 1.074   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9189] (D1 only) ICE on simple valid code since dmd 1.074   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9189] (D1 only) ICE on simple valid code since dmd 1.074   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9189] (D1 only) ICE on simple valid code since dmd 1.074   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8061] std.algorithm.joiner breaks when used with InputRangeObject   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8061] std.algorithm.joiner breaks when used with InputRangeObject   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9068] ICE when trying to break outer loop from inside switch statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8061] std.algorithm.joiner breaks when used with InputRangeObject   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8061] std.algorithm.joiner breaks when used with InputRangeObject   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9068] ICE when trying to break outer loop from inside switch statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8061] std.algorithm.joiner breaks when used with InputRangeObject   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8900] Using zip with char[] sometimes fails to compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9190] New: Vector operations are not optimized for x86_64 architecture   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9190] Vector operations are not optimized for x86_64 architecture   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4991] Make 'nothrow', other function attributes, accessible (via traits?)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4960] dmd 2.049 rejects code containing templates with a uint as template parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4813] trait for getting at access modifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4844] _traits(allMembers, X) ignores version guards inside X   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4829] Linux build fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4487] 16 bytes long structs requires 32 bytes if allocated singularly on the heap   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4484] Warning for unreachable code in scope statements is too confusing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4484] Warning for unreachable code in scope statements is too confusing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9191] New: Unhelpful error message on failing override   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9191] Unhelpful error message on failing override   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4419] __gshared static in class has no effect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4187] Error Message for std.file.remove outputting wrong file and line   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4265] It should be possible to query template parameters with __traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4216] Class method hidden by another one warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6373] More descriptive 'hidden by X is deprecated' error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9080] Reject effect-free assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4407] Catch wrong argument<->attribute assignments in methods   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4187] Error Message for std.file.remove outputting wrong file and line   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4010] dmd should support linkers other than OPTLINK   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4141] unary ++ (post increment) tries and fails to invoke opBinary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4010] dmd should support linkers other than OPTLINK   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4010] dmd should support linkers other than OPTLINK   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3972] Regarding module with name different from its file name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4479] Module Foo is in multiple files Foo   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4010] dmd should support linkers other than OPTLINK   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3969] Built-in compile time errors against usage of wrong operator strings   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3943] "in" function argument is redundant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3821] writeln doesn't detect recursive data structures yet   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3821] writeln doesn't detect recursive data structures yet   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8700] Inner type deduction?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9022] IFTI should support enclosing type/scope deduction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3969] Built-in compile time errors against usage of wrong operator strings   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8129] Cannot deduce template function when using partially specified type in function parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4487] 16 bytes long structs requires 32 bytes if allocated singularly on the heap   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4010] dmd should support linkers other than OPTLINK   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3972] Regarding module with name different from its file name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4010] dmd should support linkers other than OPTLINK   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9192] New: Allow opEquals for .tupleof expressions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3756] std.traits.ReturnType broken for ref returns   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9012] writef/format inconsistent with format specifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4183] @property doesnt work with delegate return type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4463] double.init in associative array seems 0.0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4183] @property doesnt work with delegate return type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3714] Identity assignment operator overload LEGAL for const, shared, etc.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3715] std.string.format can't use const/immutable toString functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3810] overloading on const does not work for template methods   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3561] math.abs signature accepts static arrays, but errors internally.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3131] better type resolve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5543] to!int to see a char as a single-char string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3438] struct ctor with defaulted parameters should be rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4006] dirEntries won't span subdirectories   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8967] dirEntries throws when encountering a "long path" on windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8298] dirEntries special linux file in Home dir   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8291] dirEntry cannot handle root directories + unhandled exception causes crash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8250] dirEntries fails to generate file list when compiled with -inline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9193] New: Wrong code with mixing -inline/non-inline modules, nested functions and templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9193] Wrong code with mixing -inline/non-inline modules, nested functions and templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8250] dirEntries fails to generate file list when compiled with -inline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3780] getopt improvements by Igor Lesik   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3258] Calling private or package override methods calls the base implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9194] New: Module imports are not properly checked when found in import path   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9195] New: Can do pointer arithmetic in safeD!   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9195] Can do pointer arithmetic in safeD!   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9195] Can do pointer arithmetic in safeD!   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9195] Can do pointer arithmetic in safeD!   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9195] Can do pointer arithmetic in safeD!   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9195] Can do pointer arithmetic in safeD!   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3969] Built-in compile time errors against usage of wrong operator strings   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2775] "private" ignored for templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9196] New: Spellchecker suggestions hit private symbols (and cause bad diganostic)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9196] Spellchecker suggestions hit private symbols (and cause bad diganostic)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9196] Spellchecker suggestions hit private symbols (and cause bad diganostic)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9196] Spellchecker suggestions hit private symbols (and cause bad diganostic)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5839] Spellchecker matches private symbols outside of the module, leading to extra, broken error messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5839] Spellchecker matches private symbols outside of the module, leading to extra, broken error messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5839] Spellchecker matches private symbols outside of the module, leading to extra, broken error messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5839] Spellchecker matches private symbols outside of the module, leading to extra, broken error messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9197] New: Assigning structs with postblit to a member of another struct fails at CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9197] Assigning structs with postblit to a member of another struct fails at CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9197] Assigning structs with postblit to a member of another struct fails at CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8447] Self importing is allowed?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4265] It should be possible to query template parameters with __traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4265] It should be possible to query template parameters with __traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8841] Missing line numbers in stack trace?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9198] New: Vararg functions don't respect IFTI rules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9198] Vararg functions don't respect IFTI rules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9198] Vararg functions don't respect IFTI rules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Unable to join thread   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Unable to join thread   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8841] Missing line numbers in stack trace?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7152] Can't assign null to default argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7019] implicit constructors are inconsistently allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8960] DMD 2.061 git head: Unable to set thread priority   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8992] __traits(compileError)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9199] New: Module level qualified functions should be rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9199] Module level qualified functions should be rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9199] Module level qualified functions should be rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9199] Module level qualified functions should be rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1001] print stack trace (in debug mode) when program die   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9012] writef/format inconsistent with format specifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8676] lockstep needs to document default stopping policy   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9200] New: Wrong SIMD cod generated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9200] Wrong SIMD cod generated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9200] Wrong SIMD code generated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9200] Wrong SIMD code generated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9200] Wrong SIMD code generated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2913] aliasing a ref type is not possible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2771] browse() fails if Safari is renamed or moved.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1893] Allow delete to work on non-lvalues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1962] -H also compiles and links   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1988] more unicode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 317] Need full translation of the Windows API headers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2458] Can't deduce sizeof inner struct inside a template mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1673] is(symbol == template) should work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3642] Poor error message: function ___ not callable with argument types ___   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1730] Bogus error message calling a non-const struct method on a const struct reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4497] inexpressive error message for const object method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1730] Bogus error message calling a non-const struct method on a const struct reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1730] Bogus error message calling a non-const struct method on a const struct reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8061] std.algorithm.joiner breaks when used with InputRangeObject   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5713] Broken final switch on ints   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6905] ref acts as auto ref when return type is missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6905] ref acts as auto ref when return type is missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5906] Just pre-conditions at compile-time when arguments are static   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8061] std.algorithm.joiner breaks when used with InputRangeObject   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8061] std.algorithm.joiner breaks when used with InputRangeObject   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9201] New: WNDPROC does not have to be nothrow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9201] WNDPROC does not have to be nothrow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9202] New: Missing DrawTextA & W in windows header. Also missing a couple of enum related.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9202] Missing DrawTextA & W in windows header. Also missing a couple of enum related.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9202] Missing DrawTextA & W in windows header. Also missing a couple of enum related.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 317] Need full translation of the Windows API headers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9203] New: Template functions with auto ref params do not share static locals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9204] New: Unable to create alias to template function instance with auto ref param   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7252] ICE(template.c): 'global.errors' on line 4893 in file 'template.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7252] ICE(template.c): 'global.errors' on line 4893 in file 'template.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8061] std.algorithm.joiner breaks when used with InputRangeObject   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9205] New: Better error message for misplaced pure nothrow tags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9206] New: std.exception.isValidEnumValue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9207] New: std.array.join of immutable(string[])   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5906] Just pre-conditions at compile-time when arguments are static   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5906] Just pre-conditions at compile-time when arguments are static   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Unable to join thread   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Unable to join thread   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5906] Just pre-conditions at compile-time when arguments are static   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5906] Just pre-conditions at compile-time when arguments are static   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Unable to join thread   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Unable to join thread   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Unable to join thread   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1730] Bogus error message calling a non-const struct method on a const struct reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2849] Length of a local immutable(char[]) cannot be a template value argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3924] nothrow ignored in some situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8863] struct passed to template: cannot access frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2020] version(release) is missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8863] struct passed to template: cannot access frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2020] version(release) is missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1397] BufferedFile HANDLE constructor needs default parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9099] segfault while returning an atomicLoad value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9099] segfault while returning an atomicLoad value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9208] New: [ICE](func.c line 1205) with auto return in recursive function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9208] [ICE](func.c line 1205) with auto return in recursive function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9209] New: [ICE](symbol.c line 1025) with const struct heap allocation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5713] Broken final switch on ints   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8141] Two small improvements for std.string maketrans and translate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8148] properties and the ternary operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8159] ICE(cgcs.c): Slicing r-value static array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4414] ICE(cgcs.c) Taking item of static array returned by function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4414] ICE(cgcs.c) Taking item of static array returned by function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8841] Missing line numbers in stack trace?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6844] Reinterpret cast of static to dynamic array doesn't work in safe code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8838] Slicing static arrays should be considered unsafe (@system)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8838] Slicing static arrays should be considered unsafe (@system)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9210] New: [2.061 beta] Import cycle causes unpredictable compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9210] [2.061 beta] Import cycle causes unpredictable compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9210] [2.061 beta] Import cycle causes unpredictable compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9210] [2.061 beta] Import cycle causes unpredictable compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9210] [2.061 beta] Import cycle causes unpredictable compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9210] [2.061 beta] Import cycle causes unpredictable compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9210] [2.061 beta] Import cycle causes unpredictable compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9210] [2.061 beta] Import cycle causes unpredictable compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9211] New: regex lookahead, (?=(\d\d\d)+\b) failed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9211] regex lookahead, (?=(\d\d\d)+\b) failed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9211] regex lookahead, (?=(\d\d\d)+\b) failed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9211] regex lookahead, (?=(\d\d\d)+\b) failed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4203] Const field of struct that contains a whole struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3449] const and invariant struct members do not behave according to spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9212] New: Associative array foreach iteration with immutable key   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9213] New: [2.061 beta] Member access without this and __traits(compiles, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9213] [2.061 beta] Member access without this and __traits(compiles, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9213] [2.061 beta] Member access without this and __traits(compiles, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9213] [2.061 beta] Member access without this and __traits(compiles, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9213] [2.061 beta] Member access without this and __traits(compiles, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8320] metastrings.Format and int array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8235] IsUserAnAdmin not in shell32.lib   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6625] Distribute newer Windows API import libraries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3277] DMD includes a version of OleAut32.lib which is missing some functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6625] Distribute newer Windows API import libraries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8299] segfault on incorrect (?) module declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8399] Deprecation of scope not documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8375] std.path.sep is deprecated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8192] inconsistent behavior of initialized immutable instance fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3449] const and invariant struct members do not behave according to spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8225] UFCS when the first argument is a function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8270] Different error messages for missing const in var[] and var.opSlice()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8270] Different error messages for missing const in var[] and var.opSlice()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7764] Using phobos on windows through MinGW   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7763] No template instantiation backtrace printed trying to use writefln on a const or immutable object reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8041] __gshared/static problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8302] Documentation of dirEntries in std.file is incomplete   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9214] New: TickDuration.to should probably be a property   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9214] TickDuration.to should probably be a property   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9214] TickDuration.to should probably be a property   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9214] TickDuration.to should probably be a property   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9214] TickDuration.to should probably be a property   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8225] UFCS when the first argument is a function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9215] New: [2.061 beta] isDymanicArray/DynamicArrayTypeOf broken for classes/interfaces with AliasThis   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9215] [2.061 beta] isDymanicArray/DynamicArrayTypeOf broken for classes/interfaces with AliasThis   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9215] [2.061 beta] isDymanicArray/DynamicArrayTypeOf broken for classes/interfaces with AliasThis   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9215] [2.061 beta] isDymanicArray/DynamicArrayTypeOf broken for classes/interfaces with AliasThis   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9215] [2.061 beta] isDymanicArray/DynamicArrayTypeOf broken for classes/interfaces with AliasThis   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8317] [ICE] (cast.c, line 1986) with array of lambdas   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8309] ICE in typeMerge on 'void main(){auto x = [()=>1.0, ()=>1]; }'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2505] Inline Assembly: Getting offset of a label   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1829] Inline assembler cannot get label addresses   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8448] Take address of label (at least in inline asm)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1829] Inline assembler cannot get label addresses   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9216] New: Local import of std.array does not make popFront() visible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9216] Local import of std.array does not make popFront() visible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9216] Local import of std.array does not make popFront() visible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9217] New: A problem with default function argument initialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9217] A problem with default function argument initialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1528] [tdpl] overloading template and non-template functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1829] Inline assembler cannot get label addresses   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8505] Threadgroups fails using DMD 2.060   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9099] core.atomic.atomicLoad() cannot handle non-POD structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8514] dmd generate bug that segfault in very weird situation.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8854] incomprehensible bug on windows with import side effect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5064] runtime crash using closure as alias parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1350] delegate literal inside tuple; wrong values   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7122] [module] compiler fails to handle import of renamed module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6185] UFCS doesn't work with function imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7019] implicit constructors are inconsistently allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7685] Cannot initialize const field if field initializer present   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9218] New: [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9218] [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9218] [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9218] [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9218] [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9218] [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9218] [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9218] [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9218] [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9218] [2.061] Correct signature of struct opCmp no longer accepts enum structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2273] Whitespace is not inserted after commas   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9219] New: Allow matching { } in asm statements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9219] Allow matching { } in asm statements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6614] std.traits should have an isFinal template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8041] __gshared/static problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9220] New: module constructor breaks implicit linking with DLL   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6354] Optimizer bug on x86_64: Bitshift optimized out when foreach and scope(failure) are used   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6754] extern() in a function signature   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9221] New: Added -di flag to make use of deprecated symbols a warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9221] Added -di flag to make use of deprecated symbols a warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9222] New: Add User Defined Attributes (UDA)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9222] Add User Defined Attributes (UDA)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9223] New: Add -de and -dw switches   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9223] Add -de and -dw switches   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9224] New: Add Win64 code generation support for use with Visual C   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9224] Add Win64 code generation support for use with Visual C   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9225] New: Add sections [Environment32] and [Environment64] to sc.ini/dmd.conf   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9225] Add sections [Environment32] and [Environment64] to sc.ini/dmd.conf   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9226] New: More simd instructions allowed as intrinsics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9226] More simd instructions allowed as intrinsics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9227] New: __traits(identifier, ...) to pick out identifier from parameter list tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9227] __traits(identifier, ...) to pick out identifier from parameter list tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9228] New: Add getProtection to __traits()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9228] Add getProtection to __traits()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4528] Better error message for private abstract method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1840] Fix ambiguity errors over struct static opCall and regular opCall   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8787] Virtual not abstract methods in interfaces error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8193] wrong error message on escaping initialized immutable instance field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3449] const and invariant struct members do not behave according to spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6707] Error message for mismatch of const/non-const property functions needs to improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1730] Bogus error message calling a non-const struct method on a const struct reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6981] incorrect error message when calling method without parentheses   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1730] Bogus error message calling a non-const struct method on a const struct reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6553] Better const(char[]) !-> string error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6559] Compiler message expression formatting does not match phobos   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5905] Error message with const fixed-size array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4947] Not easy to understand error message with pure and const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6915] "pure" after template constraint too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4946] Not good error message with wrongly positioned 'const'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4663] Wrong 'static' position error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4540] Better error message for wrong switch type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9229] New: Private default arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9229] Private default arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9229] Private default arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9229] Private default arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9229] Private default arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 391] .sort and .reverse break utf8 encoding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6553] Better const(char[]) !-> string error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9230] New: Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9230] Incorrect implicit immutable conversion occurs in pure function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6553] Better const(char[]) !-> string error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4947] Not easy to understand error message with pure and const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5905] Error message with const fixed-size array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6559] Compiler message expression formatting does not match phobos   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6559] Compiler message expression formatting does not match phobos   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9231] New: overriding inout funcion with attribute inference reports weird error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9231] overriding inout funcion with attribute inference reports weird error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9232] New: Parsing error on some templated methods calls   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9232] Parsing error on some templated methods calls   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9232] Parsing error on some templated methods calls   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9232] Parsing error on some templated methods calls   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9232] Parsing error on some templated methods calls   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9233] New: compiler infinite recursion on recursive mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9233] compiler infinite recursion on nested mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9233] compiler infinite recursion on nested mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7685] Cannot initialize const field if field initializer present   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9234] New: DMD confuses string template parameter with function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9234] DMD confuses string template parameter with function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9234] DMD confuses string template parameter with function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9234] DMD confuses string template parameter with function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9234] DMD confuses string template parameter with function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9234] DMD confuses string template parameter with function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7978] UTF exception (memory corruption?) using std.range.chain (behavior changes with -g)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9235] New: Template mixin makes doesn't allow to mixin in non-conflicting overloads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9235] Template mixin doesn't allow to mixin non-conflicting overloads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5204] Inherited out contract requires lvalue result?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9236] New: CTFE ice on switch + with(EnumType)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8460] ICE(toir.c) 178   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9037] DDoc: Chokes on consecutive example sections:   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9037] DDoc: Chokes on consecutive example sections:   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4947] Not easy to understand error message with pure and const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4947] Not easy to understand error message with pure and const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4947] Not easy to understand error message with pure and const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8460] ICE(toir.c) 178   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7978] UTF exception (memory corruption?) using std.range.chain (behavior changes with -g)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4947] Not easy to understand error message with pure and const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9237] New: add __traits(isPOD, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9237] add __traits(isPOD, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9237] add __traits(isPOD, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9237] add __traits(isPOD, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9237] add __traits(isPOD, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9099] core.atomic.atomicLoad() cannot handle non-POD structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9238] New: Support rvalue references   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9238] Support rvalue references   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9238] Support rvalue references   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9238] Support rvalue references   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9238] Support rvalue references   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9238] Support rvalue references   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9238] Support rvalue references   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9238] Support rvalue references   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9238] Support rvalue references   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9238] Support rvalue references   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4205] Strange error message when trying to call unknown method on string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6368] Too many error messages for a missing );   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9239] New: x86_64 ABI: 3 byte structs are never enregistered   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9026] Template mixin identifier as template alias parameter doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8832] Segfault when accessing range returned by function that has delegate referencing local variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7105] relax inout rules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6715] Using a custom pow function for ^^   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9240] New: (Regression: 2.058) non-const does not implicitly convert to const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9241] New: 2.061: Property call error message disappeared   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9242] New: Add stack smashing code to flush out heisenbugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9242] Add stack smashing code to flush out heisenbugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9242] Add stack smashing code to flush out heisenbugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9242] Add stack smashing code to flush out heisenbugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9243] New: Order locals to prevent buffer overflow attacks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9243] Order locals to prevent buffer overflow attacks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9243] Order locals to prevent buffer overflow attacks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9243] Order locals to prevent buffer overflow attacks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9243] Order locals to prevent buffer overflow attacks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9243] Order locals to prevent buffer overflow attacks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5570] 64 bit C ABI not followed for passing structs and complex numbers as function parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9244] New: union containing pointers not allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9244] union containing pointers not allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9099] core.atomic.atomicLoad() cannot handle non-POD structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9099] core.atomic.atomicLoad() cannot handle non-POD structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9099] core.atomic.atomicLoad() cannot handle non-POD structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9245] New: [CTFE] postblit not called on static array initialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8715] map, filter, zip, not with functional arrays/associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6779] Error: can only initialize const member xxx inside constructor - not const, no line number   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4596] [tdpl] Rebinding *this* in class method compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8965] Implement mixin template for forwading constructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9066] Implement constructor forwarding template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9246] New: safe struct with dtor doesn't generate safe opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4829] Linux build fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4737] typeid doesn't work for scoped enum with initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5130] writeln cannot take delegate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8361] [ICE] (eh.c line 316) with struct with dtor in assert   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8391] Segmentation fault (core dumped) with std.write   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4737] typeid doesn't work for scoped enum with initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8369] try/finally block and float division by zero   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7292] Exception and Error missing from object docs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8361] [ICE] (eh.c line 316) with struct with dtor in assert   d-bugmail at puremagic.com

Last message date: Mon Dec 31 20:57:57 PST 2012
Archived on: Mon Dec 31 21:00:06 PST 2012

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...