[Issue 9104] No line number with private name found by "did you mean"

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sun Dec 2 11:31:41 PST 2012


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9104


Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jmdavisProg at gmx.com


--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> 2012-12-02 11:31:40 PST ---
> It seems the routine that finds similar names has to exclude not visibile
names:

Except that private symbols _are_ visibile. They're just not accessible. It
would be cool if we could convince Walter of making them invisible (at least as
far as stuff like overload sets go), but they're definitely visible.

That being said, I don't know that it's a good idea for the spell checker to be
suggesting symbols which are inaccessible, and it definitely shouldn't be
complaining about them being private when _it_ is the one using them and not
the actual code.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list