[Issue 9169] New: semantic order difference in variable declaration
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sun Dec 16 23:57:35 PST 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
Summary: semantic order difference in variable declaration
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nobody at puremagic.com
ReportedBy: k.hara.pg at gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg at gmail.com> 2012-12-16 23:57:34 PST ---
Spin-off issue from bug 9159.
Between DeclDefs and function body scopes, semantic analysis works differently
for variable declaration.
----
version = A; // or B
struct P {
int v;
this(int i) { v = i; }
}
P p(int i) {
assert(0);
return typeof(return)(i);
}
class C {
version(A)
P p = p(10); // Error: struct P does not overload ()
}
void main() {
version(B)
P p = p(10); // asserts in runtime
}
----
In the semantic analysis for the expression p(10),
- `p` matches the declared variable itself in DeclDefs scope (version=A).
- `p` matches the module level function in function scope (version=B).
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list