[Issue 8774] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: nested delegate memory corruption

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8774



--- Comment #21 from Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk> 2012-12-26 07:11:49 PST ---
OK I can accept that map delivers an iterable but not a sequence, so to create
a sequence application of array is needed. This would imply though that 2.059 →
2.060 introduces an undocumented breaking change – albeit a good one correcting
a bug.

Having i work and ii not work implies the whole closure capture mechanism in
2.059 → 2.060 underwent breaking change. The question then is which closure
semantics are correct, indeed whether delegates are required to create
closures.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------