Stopping a StopWatch that's not started

[David Nadlinger]

On Thursday, 12 July 2012 at 19:52:13 UTC, ixid wrote:
> This may not qualify as a bug though it's not helpful. If you 
> stop a StopWatch from std.datetime that's not been started it 
> gets set to a garbage time value rather than remaining at 0. 
> This seems like inconsistent behaviour as stopping a started 
> stopwatch retains the time value that it had when it was 
> stopped. A linked enhancement request would be that it would be 
> nice to have a dedicated 'isStarted' boolean member function to 
> check if a StopWatch is running or not rather than checking 
> that time has passed.

This group is strictly meant for providing a feed of bug tracker 
activity, and is generally not monitored (posting should really 
be restricted). Please file any bug reports or enhancement 
requests directly to the Bugzilla instance at 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/.

David