The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

July 2012 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sun Jul 1 00:41:23 PDT 2012
Ending: Tue Jul 31 22:13:28 PDT 2012
Messages: 731

• [Issue 1001] print stack trace (in debug mode) when program die   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1001] print stack trace (in debug mode) when program die   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1064] Tuples are not expanded in array initializers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1064] Tuples are not expanded in array initializers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1064] Tuples are not expanded in array initializers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1175] nested class inheritance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 144] Alias and function names fail to collide   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1824] Object not const correct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1824] Object not const correct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1824] Object not const correct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1824] Object not const correct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2006] Empty array literals with explicit type implicitly convert to any array type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2006] Empty array literals with explicit type implicitly convert to any array type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2006] Empty array literals with explicit type implicitly convert to any array type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2006] Empty array literals with explicit type implicitly convert to any array type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2006] Empty array literals with explicit type implicitly convert to any array type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2278] Guarantee alignment of stack-allocated variables on x86   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2547] Array Ops should check length, at least when bounds checking is on   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2547] Array Ops should check length, at least when bounds checking is on   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3031] scoped static var conflicts while linking   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3308] Enum.RED.stringof gives "Enum", not "Enum.RED"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3309] `Traits` : function parameters name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3449] const and invariant struct members do not behave according to spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3449] const and invariant struct members do not behave according to spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3449] const and invariant struct members do not behave according to spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3449] const and invariant struct members do not behave according to spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3646] Default values of function arguments are ignored when instantiating a template.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3731] Derived class implicitly convertible to base class with arbitrary change of constancy   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3731] Derived class implicitly convertible to base class with arbitrary change of constancy   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3753] ICE eh.c 49: Related to exception handling and alloca.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3866] anonymous delegate with default parameters cross-talks to another anonymous delegate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3866] anonymous delegate with default parameters cross-talks to another anonymous delegate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3866] anonymous delegate with default parameters cross-talks to another anonymous delegate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3866] anonymous delegate with default parameters cross-talks to another anonymous delegate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3960] Unused local variables not reported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3960] Unused local variables not reported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3960] Unused local variables not reported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4054] ICE(eh.c) line 49   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4161] @disable after function signature has no effect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4183] @property doesnt work with delegate return type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4250] std.regex does not support character sets other than unicode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4301] BigInt * const(BigInt) doesn't work well   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4405] all function - returns whether predicate is true for all elements in a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4498] cannot get return type of a function returning a nested struct with typeof   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4498] cannot get return type of a function returning a nested struct with typeof   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4517] final switch over with base type allows missing values   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4517] final switch over with base type allows missing values   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4662] Array ops on const arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4662] Array ops on const arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4662] Array ops on const arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4662] Array ops on const arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4662] Array ops on const arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4662] Array ops on const arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4665] map with no automatic closure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4665] map with no automatic closure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4694] Unused last assignment warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4809] Stack trace when throwing exception misses location of the throw statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4809] Stack trace when throwing exception misses location of the throw statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4884] Using template struct parameters in method definition fails with "parameter _param_0 is already defined"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4936] Better error when type inference fails due to incorrect template parameter type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4937] std.bitmanip: Allow repeated (identical) bitfield declarations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4953] Regression(2.031): templates don't do implicit conversion properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4957] std.concurrency does not allow to pass Tid in struct fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4997] names, values, length and basetype enum properties   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5011] std.container: SList linearRemove produces wrong results   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5044] opIndexUnary not working for post++   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5168] String enums don't work with -g compiler switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5403] foreach requires front to be a function in a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5403] foreach requires front to be a function in a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5466] Associative array byPair   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5498] wrong common type deduction for array of classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5547] Improve assert to give information on values given to it when it fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5550] std.range.enumerate()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5550] std.range.enumerate()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5555] Built-in associative arrays in pure nothrow functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5570] 64 bit C ABI not followed for passing structs and complex numbers as function parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5640] error with constructing RedBlackTree from range of array (typesafe variadics)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5655] Lambda inside static foreach saves wrong value of counter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5655] Lambda inside static foreach saves wrong value of counter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5660] yield syntax sugar   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5710] cannot use delegates as parameters to non-global template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5710] cannot use delegates as parameters to non-global template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5849] std.random.dice is better as a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5851] Ambiguous alias this accepted.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5851] Ambiguous alias this accepted.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5926] D2 shows empty command line on Windows 98 SE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5939] Cannot copy std.algorithm.map   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5939] Cannot copy std.algorithm.map   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5939] Cannot copy std.algorithm.map   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5939] Cannot copy std.algorithm.map   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5939] Cannot copy std.algorithm.map   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5939] Cannot copy std.algorithm.map   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6153] Inserting to An Array!T inside an Array!(Array!T) causes a segfault.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6153] Inserting to An Array!T inside an Array!(Array!T) causes a segfault.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6186] Struct destructor is not called on out parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6277] Disallow short floating point literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6329] Out of range exceptions not thrown in certain cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6379] std.container.SList fails to compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6419] [CTFE] Cannot create a non-static nested struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6426] ICE(toir.c) with function-nested alias   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6458] Multibyte char literals shouldn't implicitly convert to char   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6458] Multibyte char literals shouldn't implicitly convert to char   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6458] Multibyte char literals shouldn't implicitly convert to char   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6482] std.algorithm.moveAll precondition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6483] std.container.moveBack   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6483] std.container.moveBack   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6497] [safeD] Can take address of local variable through ?:   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6497] [safeD] Can take address of local variable through ?:   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6617] Two problems using enum lenghs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6703] Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=0042785B   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6703] Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=0042785B   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6703] Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=0042785B   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6744] Missing AA symbol with enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6834] std.stdio conflicts with core.stdc.stdio   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6966] cannot create qualified type from tuple entry   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6999] parsing error for inout method/ wrong headergen   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6999] parsing error for inout method/ wrong headergen   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7021] Structs with disabled default constructors can be constructed without calling a constructor.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7021] Structs with disabled default constructors can be constructed without calling a constructor.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7044] Missing a way to control the order of arguments passed to the linker makes impossible to link some programs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7054] std.format.formattedWrite uses code units count as width instead of characters count   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7080] Chained BigInt.opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7121] Structs with Disabled Default Constructors Also Disable No-Arg Constructors in Classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7150] Templated Constructors Should be Able to Call Other Constructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7150] Templated Constructors Should be Able to Call Other Constructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7174] Cannot use property function call as static if condition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7176] Lambda => syntax for function and methods too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7176] Lambda => syntax for function and methods too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7176] Lambda => syntax for function and methods too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7176] Lambda => syntax for function and methods too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7176] Lambda => syntax for function and methods too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7176] Lambda => syntax for function and methods too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7176] Lambda => syntax for function and methods too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7247] All programs segfault before main   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7258] std.array.array of const items   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7271] Calling struct.init causes a memory allocation.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7271] Calling struct.init causes a memory allocation.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7322] Taking address of deprecated functions isn't refused   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7322] Taking address of deprecated functions isn't refused   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7322] Taking address of deprecated functions isn't refused   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7322] Taking address of deprecated functions isn't refused   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7322] Taking address of deprecated functions isn't refused   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7322] Taking address of deprecated functions isn't refused   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7322] Taking address of deprecated functions isn't refused   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7366] IFTI fails to consider bounds-checked implicit conversions for non-deduced parameter types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7385] Bad error message missing line number on invalid array op that isn't special cased   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7385] Bad error message missing line number on invalid array op that isn't special cased   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7385] Bad error message missing line number on invalid array op that isn't special cased   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7385] Bad error message missing line number on invalid array op that isn't special cased   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7491] import symbol name unavailable in class scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7491] import symbol name unavailable in class scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7561] std.net.curl broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7579] Disabled postblit ignored and not called by all array operations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7579] Disabled postblit ignored and not called by all array operations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7579] disabled postblit not checked for array appending   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7591] Wrong const-folding comparisons involving complex nans   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7593] cfloat to cdouble conversion is broken when using xmm   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7594] xmm ops use actual addition/subtraction when evaluating real+imaginary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7610] DMD -H switch doesn't output interfaces to package hierarchy   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7648] Can't open file (Windows UTF8)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7648] std.stdio expects file names to be encoded in CP_ACP on Windows instead of UTF-8   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7733] [tdpl] opIndexUnary not called with postfix increment/decrement operators   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7770] __dollar cannot be read at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7798] Improve nested functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7803] Regression(2.054) scope(success) in nothrow/@safe functions causes compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7803] Regression(2.054) scope(success) in nothrow/@safe functions causes compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7803] Regression(2.054) scope(success) in nothrow/@safe functions causes compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7803] scope(success) in nothrow/@safe functions causes compile errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7894] [CTFE] - goto within ForStatement restarts loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7894] [CTFE] - goto within ForStatement restarts loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7894] [CTFE] - goto within ForStatement restarts loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7898] [CTFE] std.algorithm:copy fails when used with two arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7936] std.random.randomSample always returns the same first value when passed a random number generator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7948] std.range.zip broken with requireSameLength   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7948] std.range.zip broken with requireSameLength   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7948] std.range.zip broken with requireSameLength   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7965] Invalid outer function scope pointer in some cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7965] Invalid outer function scope pointer in some cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7965] Invalid outer function scope pointer in some cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7965] Invalid outer function scope pointer in some cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7965] Invalid outer function scope pointer in some cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7973] BigInt %= long/ulong gives wrong value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7973] BigInt %= long/ulong gives wrong value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7973] BigInt %= long/ulong gives wrong value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7973] BigInt %= long/ulong gives wrong value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7978] UTF exception (memory corruption?) using std.range.chain (behavior changes with -g)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7993] BigInt divide-by-1 error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7993] BigInt divide-by-1 error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7998] static assert message string printing problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8020] std.stdio can't open UTF16 file names in Windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8022] BigInt division bug (2)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8022] BigInt division bug (2)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8031] If a class have some signals it's impossible for a derived class to have any signals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8031] If a class have some signals it's impossible for a derived class to have any signals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8085] std.algorithm.joiner makes invalid assumptions about front()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8089] Importing package as module causes segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8117] Cannot initialize struct member without default constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8121] "scope ref" is perfectly OK   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8121] "scope ref" is perfectly OK   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8152] Linking C library causes Seg-fault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8158] std.algorithm.min fails to compile with user-defined types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8162] [TDPL] -property fails to give an error when a property function is called with parens   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8163] compiler error when assigning a static array return value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8163] compiler error when assigning a static array return value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8164] BigInt from char[] too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8164] BigInt from char[] too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8165] BigInt opAssign return value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8165] BigInt opAssign return value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8185] Pure functions and pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8185] Pure functions and pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8191] cstream.printf is completely unusable on x86_64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8191] cstream.printf is completely unusable on x86_64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8191] cstream.printf is completely unusable on x86_64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8191] cstream.printf is completely unusable on x86_64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8212] shared value data structures should implicitly cast to mutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8212] shared value data structures should implicitly cast to mutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8216] CTFE should allow 'pointer is inside range' comparisons   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8222] Optlink crashes when debug info is enabled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8231] conv.to fails to convert string with trailing "u"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8235] IsUserAnAdmin not in shell32.lib   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8238] regression: templates can create ghost fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8238] templates can create ghost fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8239] PIC always enabled on OSX   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8258] Delegates do not respect default parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8261] std.traits.ParameterTypeTuple may break existing codes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8274] thread_attachThis only works for main thread   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8276] [CTFE] ICE when reading variable from nested function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8283] ICE(cod1.c): returning struct with constructor as member of another struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8283] ICE(cod1.c): returning struct with constructor as member of another struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8283] ICE(cod1.c): returning struct with constructor as member of another struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8283] ICE(cod1.c): returning struct with constructor as member of another struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8283] ICE(cod1.c): returning struct with constructor as member of another struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8285] Error passing CTFE-generated string slice to template value parameter   Max Samukha
• [Issue 8285] ParameterStorageClassTuple fails in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8306] alias 'array' this consumes array on iteration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8312] Too many error messages with a writeln of fixed size array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8312] Too many error messages with a writeln of fixed size array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8312] Too many error messages with a writeln of fixed size array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8312] Too many error messages with a writeln of fixed size array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8312] Too many error messages with a writeln of fixed size array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8312] Too many error messages with a writeln of fixed size array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8312] Too many error messages with a writeln of fixed size array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8314] randomSample primes with constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8316] Regression with template functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8321] std.range.put doesn't work with RefCounted output range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8323] std.string.chompPrefix does not handle differing string types properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8323] std.string.chompPrefix does not handle differing string types properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8323] std.string.chompPrefix does not handle differing string types properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8323] std.string.chompPrefix does not handle differing string types properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8330] New: std.algorithm.find doesn't handle reference type ranges correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8331] New: Problem with sort!(SwapStrategy.stable)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8331] Problem with sort!(SwapStrategy.stable)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8332] New: std.Array.Range.opIndexOpAssign does not compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8332] std.Container.Range.opIndexOpAssign does not compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8333] New: std.Container.Array (and .Range) du not implement opIndexUnary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8333] std.Container.Array (and .Range) du not implement opIndexUnary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8334] find cannot handle close match at end of haystack in needle isn't bi-directional   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8334] New: find cannot handle close match at end of haystack in needle isn't bi-directional   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8335] `ref` is ignored for static array of stucts with postblit argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8335] `ref` is ignored for static array of stucts with postblit argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8335] `ref` is ignored for static array of stucts with postblit argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8335] `ref` is ignored for static array of stucts with postblit argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8335] `ref` is ignored for static array of stucts with postblit argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8335] `ref` is ignored for static array of stucts with postblit argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8335] New: DMD ignoring ref for array arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8336] Default function parameters ignored by delegate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8336] Default function parameters ignored by delegate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8336] Default function parameters ignored by delegate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8336] New: Default function parameters ignored by delegate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8337] using contracts on an interface makes the compiler frontend segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8338] New: Unqual doesn't work properly on arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8338] Unqual doesn't work properly on arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8338] Unqual doesn't work properly on arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8338] Unqual doesn't work properly on arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8338] Unqual doesn't work properly on arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8339] is(typeof(...)) is reporting true when it's false due to nested function error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8339] is(typeof(...)) is reporting true when it's false due to nested function error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8339] is(typeof(...)) is reporting true when it's false due to nested function error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8339] New: is(typeof(...)) is reporting true when it's false due to nested function error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8340] New: *= operator breaks long array in x64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8341] New: topN(zip()) too?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8342] New: Truly sorted output for topNCopy(zip())?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8343] New: Last argument of topNCopy forcing a sort?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8344] New: segfault on recursive template constraint evaluation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8345] New: Odd error for using 08 literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8346] New: Literals 00 - 07 results in odd errors when used with UFCS   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8347] New: Parser bug with const placed after ~this() in decl   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE: 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE: 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE: 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE: 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] ICE: 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8348] New: ICE: 'semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' on line 547 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8349] CTFE memcpy Error with ctRegex   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8349] CTFE memcpy Error with ctRegex   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8349] New: CTFE memcpy Error with ctRegex   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8350] Misleading error message with invalid array operation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8350] New: array operation not fullly implemented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8351] Lambdas in 'static foreach' give errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8351] Lambdas in 'static foreach' give errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8351] New: Lambdas in 'static foreach' give errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8352] New: Wrong "__overloadset isn't a template" error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8353] Array of polymorphic objects does not compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8353] New: Array of polymorphic objects does not compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8354] New: Some missing "import std.math to use ^^ operator" error messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8354] Some missing "import std.math to use ^^ operator" error messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8355] New: struct's sizeof has bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8355] struct's sizeof has bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8355] struct's sizeof has bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8355] struct's sizeof has bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8355] struct's sizeof has bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8356] New: Disabled postblit ignored on return statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8357] New: ICE instantiating template inside of a unittest   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8358] New: TypeInfo_Const next implementation is wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8359] New: std.stdio.write(ln) segmentation faults   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8360] Destruction of uninitialized temporary struct with assert   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8360] New: Destruction of uninitialized temporary struct with assert   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8361] New: [ICE] (eh.c line 316) with struct with dtor in assert   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8362] New: safe function 'benchmark' cannot call system function literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8362] safe function 'benchmark' cannot call system function literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8362] safe function 'benchmark' cannot call system function literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8362] std.traits.isSafe doesn't work with unsafe lamdba functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8362] std.traits.isSafe doesn't work with unsafe lamdba functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8362] std.traits.isSafe doesn't work with unsafe lamdba functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8363] Empty array literal does not implicitly convert to associative array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8363] Empty array literal does not implicitly convert to associative array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8363] Empty array literal does not implicitly convert to associative array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8363] New: Provide an intutive way to clear all entries in Associative Array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8363] Provide an intutive way to clear all entries in Associative Array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8363] Provide an intutive way to clear all entries in Associative Array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8364] Allow exclamation mark in template definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8364] Allow exclamation mark in template definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8364] Allow exclamation mark in template definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8364] Allow exclamation mark in template definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8364] New: Allow exclamation mark in template definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8365] New: Static fixed size array of enums initialization fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8366] New: Overriding const member function in conjunction with mutable overload causes a strange error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8366] Overriding const member function in conjunction with mutable overload causes a strange error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8366] Overriding const member function in conjunction with mutable overload causes a strange error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8366] Overriding const member function in conjunction with mutable overload causes a strange error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8367] New: std.range.chain's template constraint is inadequate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8368] New: std.algorithm.sort's template constraint is inadequate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8369] New: try/finally block and float division by zero   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8370] New: invalid deprecation error with -release -inline -noboundscheck   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8371] Add a function to make a range from a sequence of elements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8371] Add a function to make a range from a sequence of elements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8371] Add a function to make a range from a sequence of elements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8371] Add a function to make a range from a sequence of elements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8371] New: Add a function to make a range from a sequence of elements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8372] -property is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8372] -property is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8372] -property is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8372] -property is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8372] -property is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8372] -property is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8372] -property is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8372] -property is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8372] -property is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8372] New: -property is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8373] IFTI fails on overloading of function vs non function template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8373] IFTI fails on overloading of function vs non function template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8373] New: IFTI fails on overloading of function vs non function template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8374] New: One missed array literal interpretation as int[2]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8374] One missed array literal interpretation as int[2]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8374] One missed array literal interpretation as int[2]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8374] One missed array literal interpretation as int[2]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8375] New: std.path.sep is deprecated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8376] New: 64 bit codegen bug involving dynamically indexed static array and continue statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8377] New: Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=004106BE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8377] Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=004106BE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8377] Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=004106BE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8378] New: /entry:_function is implemented, but undocumented.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8379] New: std.algorithm.findSplit example is freaking hard to read   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8380] -unittest makes it so that std.replace doesn't work on enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8380] New: -unittest makes it so that std.replace doesn't work on enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8381] New: Uniform function call syntax (pseudo member) enhancement suggestions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8381] Uniform function call syntax (pseudo member) enhancement suggestions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8381] Uniform function call syntax (pseudo member) enhancement suggestions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8381] Uniform function call syntax (pseudo member) enhancement suggestions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8381] Uniform function call syntax (pseudo member) enhancement suggestions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8381] Uniform function call syntax (pseudo member) enhancement suggestions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8381] Uniform function call syntax (pseudo member) enhancement suggestions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8381] Uniform function call syntax (pseudo member) enhancement suggestions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8382] New: std.bitmanip opCmp bug or user error?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8383] New: 64-bit ABI: unions not the same size as in C in some situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8384] New: Poor wchar/dchar* to string conversion support   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8384] Poor wchar/dchar* to string conversion support   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8384] Poor wchar/dchar* to string conversion support   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8384] Poor wchar/dchar* to string conversion support   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8384] Poor wchar/dchar* to string conversion support   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8384] std.conv.to should allow conversion between any pair of string/wstring/dstring/char*/wchar*/dchar*   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8384] std.conv.to should allow conversion between any pair of string/wstring/dstring/char*/wchar*/dchar*   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8384] std.conv.to should allow conversion between any pair of string/wstring/dstring/char*/wchar*/dchar*   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8384] std.conv.to should allow conversion between any pair of string/wstring/dstring/char*/wchar*/dchar*   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8385] New: to!wstring("Hello, world!"w.ptr) == "4"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8385] to!wstring("Hello, world!"w.ptr) == "4"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8386] New: writeln stopped working with wstring   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8386] writeln stopped working with wstring   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8386] writeln stopped working with wstring   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8386] writeln stopped working with wstring   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8386] writeln stopped working with wstring   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8386] writeln stopped working with wstring   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8387] New: Semantic errors in opDispatch body are not reported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8388] New: std.traits.MemberFunctionsTuple doesn't work with constructors or destructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8388] std.traits.MemberFunctionsTuple doesn't work with constructors or destructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8389] Classes, nested in the same base class cannot be derived from.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8389] Classes, nested in the same base class cannot be derived from.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8389] Classes, nested in the same base class cannot be derived from.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8389] New: Classes, nested in the same base class cannot be derived from.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8390] New: Refused array operation mutable[] += const[]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8390] Refused array operation mutable[] += const[]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8390] Refused array operation mutable[] += const[]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8391] New: Segmentation fault (core dumped) with std.write   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8392] New: DMD sometime fail when using a non static function template within a function template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8393] New: class in lambda causes linker trouble   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8394] Can't compile rdmd.d using master version under XP   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8394] Can't compile rdmd.d using master version under XP   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8394] Can't compile rdmd.d using master version under XP   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8394] Can't compile rdmd.d using master version under XP   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8394] New: Can't compile rdmd.d using master version under XP   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8395] New: Templated struct constructors don't implicitly convert to const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8395] Templated struct constructors don't implicitly convert to const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8395] Templated struct constructors don't implicitly convert to const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8396] New: wrong order of evaluation for tuple expansion in function arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8397] New: parameter types are not checked when assigning a function literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8397] parameter types are not checked when assigning a function literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8397] parameter types are not checked when assigning a function literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8397] parameter types are not checked when assigning a function literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8398] enforceEx cannot be used with OutOfMemoryError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8398] enforceEx cannot be used with OutOfMemoryError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8398] enforceEx cannot be used with OutOfMemoryError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8398] enforceEx cannot be used with OutOfMemoryError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8398] New: enforceEx cannot be used with OutOfMemoryError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8399] New: Deprecation of scope not documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8400] New: static array type cannot interpret dynamic array length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8400] static array type cannot interpret dynamic array length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8400] static array type cannot interpret dynamic array length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8400] static array type cannot interpret dynamic array length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8400] static array type cannot interpret dynamic array length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8400] static array type cannot interpret dynamic array length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8400] static array type cannot interpret dynamic array length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8400] static array type cannot interpret dynamic array length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8401] New: rdmd doesn't compile on 2.060 HEAD   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8401] rdmd doesn't compile on 2.060 HEAD   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8402] Lambda argument's default value is not taken into account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8402] New: Lambda argument's default value is not taken into account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8403] ^^ and ^^= missing from lex.html   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8403] ^^ and ^^= missing from lex.html   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8403] ^^ and ^^= missing from lex.html   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8403] New: ^^ and ^^= missing from lex.html   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8404] Importing the enclosing package of a module will crash dmd instead of generating errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8404] New: Importing the enclosing package of a module will crash dmd instead of generating errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8405] New: Create overload for joiner which is random access for random access ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8406] dmd treats lineSep and paraSep as end-of-line but the docs do not   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8406] dmd treats lineSep and paraSep as end-of-line but the docs do not   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8406] dmd treats lineSep and paraSep as end-of-line but the docs do not   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8406] New: dmd treats lineSep and paraSep as end-of-line but the docs do not   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8407] New: Add inout inferrence to member functions in templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8408] New: Purity calculation should be improved   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8409] New: Proposal: implement arr.dup in library   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8410] New: Static initializers for fixed size arrays too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8410] Static initializers for fixed size arrays too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8411] New: core.time: No easy way to check if Duration is empty   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8412] New: [GSOC] Forward reference bug fest   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8413] function breaks compilation of property function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8413] function breaks compilation of property function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8413] function breaks compilation of property function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8413] function breaks compilation of property function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8413] New: enforce breaks compilation of property function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8414] New: with statement causes linker error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8415] New: Forward reference error with static nested classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8416] New: Assertion failure: '0' on line 2018 in file 'interpret.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8417] New: Better error message on invalid operator call   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8418] New: core.thread.Fiber is a Coroutine or Semi-Coroutine?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8419] Dollar sign ($) fails in CTFE function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8419] Dollar sign ($) fails in CTFE function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8419] New: Dollar sign ($) fails in CTFE function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8420] isExpression and templates should capture all template parameters when using variadic TemplateParameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8420] isExpression and templates should capture all template parameters when using variadic TemplateParameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8420] New: isExpression and templates should capture all template parameters when using variadic TemplateParameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8421] ICE template.c:5540: Identifier* TemplateInstance::genIdent(Objects*): Assertion `global.errors' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8421] New: assertion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8422] New: TypeTuple of tuples can't be read at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8423] New: Wrong code for lazy parameters.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8423] Wrong code for bool parameter in 5th integer register.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8423] Wrong code for bool parameter in 5th integer register.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8423] Wrong code for bool parameter in 5th integer register.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8423] Wrong code for bool parameter in 5th integer register.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8423] Wrong code for bool parameter in 5th integer register.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8424] New: Compile time conversions of double/floats to strings   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8425] New: Missing line number and module name that can't use core.simd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8426] New: Spell corrector for wrong function names looks in the wrong places   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8427] [2.060 beta] static foreach over typesafe vararg rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8427] [2.060 beta] static foreach over typesafe vararg rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8427] [2.060 beta] static foreach over typesafe vararg rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8427] [2.060 beta] static foreach over typesafe vararg rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8427] New: [2.060 beta] static foreach over typesafe vararg rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8428] [2.060 beta] ByLine -> Map -> Filter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8428] [2.060 beta] ByLine -> Map -> Filter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8428] [2.060 beta] ByLine -> Map -> Filter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8428] [2.060 beta] ByLine -> Map -> Filter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8428] [2.060 beta] ByLine -> Map -> Filter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8428] [2.060 beta] ByLine -> Map -> Filter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8428] [2.060 beta] ByLine -> Map -> Filter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8428] New: [2.060 beta] ByLine -> Map -> Filter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8429] [2.060 beta] 'version' rejected inside 'static if's   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8429] [2.060 beta] 'version' rejected inside 'static if's   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8429] [2.060 beta] 'version' rejected inside 'static if's   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8429] [2.060 beta] 'version' rejected inside 'static if's   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8429] New: [2.060 beta] 'version' rejected inside 'static if's   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8430] [2.060 beta] Default arguments ignored for delegates/function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8430] [2.060 beta] Default arguments ignored for delegates/function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8430] New: [2.060 beta] Default arguments ignored for delegates/function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8431] [Optimizer] Merge equivalent jump tables for switch statements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8431] [Optimizer] Merge equivalent jump tables for switch statements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8431] New: [Optimizer] Merge equivalent jump tables for switch statements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8432] New: write needs to print full enum type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8432] write needs to print full enum type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8432] write needs to print full enum type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8432] write needs to print full enum type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8433] Compiler could warn on static if checks which can't branch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8433] Compiler could warn on static if checks which can't branch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8433] New: Compiler could warn on duplicate static if checks which can't branch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8434] [2.060 beta] cannot implicitly convert expression (vs1.opCast()) of type const(Vector2D) to object.Object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8434] [2.060 beta] cannot implicitly convert expression (vs1.opCast()) of type const(Vector2D) to object.Object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8434] [2.060 beta] cannot implicitly convert expression (vs1.opCast()) of type const(Vector2D) to object.Object   Namespace
• [Issue 8434] [2.060 beta] cannot implicitly convert expression (vs1.opCast()) of type const(Vector2D) to object.Object   Namespace
• [Issue 8434] [2.060 beta] cannot implicitly convert expression (vs1.opCast()) of type const(Vector2D) to object.Object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8434] [Regression 2.058] cannot implicitly convert expression (vs1.opCast()) of type const(Vector2D) to object.Object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8434] [Regression 2.058] cannot implicitly convert expression (vs1.opCast()) of type const(Vector2D) to object.Object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8434] [Regression 2.058] cannot implicitly convert expression (vs1.opCast()) of type const(Vector2D) to object.Object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8434] [Regression 2.058] cannot implicitly convert expression (vs1.opCast()) of type const(Vector2D) to object.Object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8434] New: [2.060 beta] cannot implicitly convert expression (vs1.opCast()) of type const(Vector2D) to object.Object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8435] New: BigInts don't work well in associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8436] ICE: Internal error: toir.c 178   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8436] ICE: Internal error: toir.c 178   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8436] ICE: Internal error: toir.c 178   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8436] New: ICE: Internal error: toir.c 178   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8437] [0.60 beta] static struct no size yet for forward reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8437] [2.060 beta] static struct no size yet for forward reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8437] [2.060 beta] static struct no size yet for forward reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8437] [2.060 beta] static struct no size yet for forward reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8437] New: [0.60 beta] static struct no size yet for forward reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8438] [0.60 beta] delegate default arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8438] New: [0.60 beta] delegate default arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8439] New: typeid fail to resolve symbol properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8440] New: templated functions + template mixins give conflict   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8441] New: function expected, not <my function>   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8442] [2.060 beta] Empty array enum not treated as immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8442] [2.060 beta] Empty array enum not treated as immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8442] [2.060 beta] Empty array enum not treated as immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8442] [2.060 beta] Empty array enum not treated as immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8442] [2.060 beta] Empty array enum not treated as immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8442] New: [2.060 beta] Empty array enum not treated as immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8443] [2.060 beta] Win32 linker bug with separate compilation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8443] [2.060 beta] Win32 linker bug with separate compilation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8443] [2.060 beta] Win32 linker bug with separate compilation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8443] New: [2.060 beta] Win32 linker bug with separate compilation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8444] Cannot use dot to disambiguate between local method and class declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8444] Cannot use dot to disambiguate between local method and class declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8444] New: Cannot use dot to disambiguate between local method and class declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8445] New: non-int enum values cause error when compiled with -g   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8445] non-int enum values cause error when compiled with -g   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8445] non-int enum values cause error when compiled with -g   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8446] New: Can't use 'this' pointer in pure member function?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8447] New: Self importing is allowed?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8448] New: Take address of label (at least in inline asm)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8449] Large array literals take a _very_ long time to compile; they do not scale at all   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8449] Large array literals take a _very_ long time to compile; they do not scale at all   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8449] New: Large array literals take a _very_ long time to compile; they do not scale at all   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8450] measureTime doesn't work with unsafe template functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8450] measureTime doesn't work with unsafe template functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8450] measureTime doesn't work with unsafe template functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8450] measureTime doesn't work with unsafe template functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8450] measureTime doesn't work with unsafe template functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8450] measureTime doesn't work with unsafe template functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8450] New: measureTime doesn't work with unsafe template functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8451] cv2pdb does not work properly with 2.060-produced binaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8451] cv2pdb does not work properly with 2.060-produced binaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8451] cv2pdb does not work properly with 2.060-produced binaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8451] cv2pdb does not work properly with 2.060-produced binaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8451] cv2pdb does not work properly with 2.060-produced binaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8451] New: cv2pdb does not work properly with 2.060-produced binaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8452] New: if lambda function can be template?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8453] Associative array keys refused as property by sort   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8453] Associative array keys refused as property by sort   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8453] Associative array keys refused as property by sort   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8453] New: Associative array keys refused as property by sort   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8454] [ICE] (backend\cg87.c 3497) with cdouble and sqrt   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8454] [ICE] (backend\cg87.c 3497) with cdouble and sqrt   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8454] [ICE] (backend\cg87.c 3497) with cdouble and sqrt   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8454] New: [ICE] (backend\cg87.c 3497) with cdouble and sqrt   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8455] New: Endless stack frame with File().byChunk()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8456] New: DMD crash with variadic base-class ctor and non-variadic subclass ctor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8457] Disabled default constructors have no effect when used in arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8457] Disabled default constructors have no effect when used in arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8457] Disabled default constructors have no effect when used in arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8457] New: Disabled default constructors have no effect when used in arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8458] New: scope(exit) enters infinite loop (DMD 2.059)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8459] New: std.traits.isSafe definition silently changed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8459] std.traits.isSafe behavior silently changed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8459] std.traits.isSafe behavior silently changed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8460] [ICE] Internal error: toir.c 178   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8460] New: [ICE] Internal error: toir.c 178   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8461] New: std.container.SList can't work with std.typecons.Proxy   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8461] std.container.SList can't work with std.typecons.Proxy   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8462] New: recursive alias error with function pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8463] Nested template static struct should work as like module level ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8463] Nested template static struct should work as like module level ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8463] Nested template static struct should work as like module level ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8463] Nested template static struct should work as like module level ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8463] Nested template static struct should work as like module level ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8463] Nested template static struct should work as like module level ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8463] Nested template static struct should work as like module level ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8463] Nested template static struct should work as like module level ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8463] Nested template static struct should work as like module level ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8463] Nested template static struct should work as like module level ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8463] Nested template static struct should work as like module level ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8463] New: Nested template static struct should work as like module level ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8464] debug too strict from function attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8464] New: debug too strict from function attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8465] New: std.file cannot set file attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8466] New: DMD segfault (2.060 git)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8467] A different third signature for std.algorithm.count   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8467] A different third signature for std.algorithm.count   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8467] New: A different third signature for std.algorithm.count   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8468] New: std.array.join of a const array of strings too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8469] isSorted fails with predicate "a.length < b.length ? true : a < b"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8469] isSorted fails with predicate "a.length < b.length ? true : a < b"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8469] isSorted fails with predicate "a.length < b.length ? true : a < b"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8469] isSorted fails with predicate "a.length < b.length ? true : a < b"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8469] isSorted fails with predicate "a.length < b.length ? true : a < b"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8469] isSorted fails with predicate "a.length < b.length ? true : a < b"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8469] isSorted fails with predicate "a.length < b.length ? true : a < b"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8469] isSorted fails with predicate "a.length < b.length ? true : a < b"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8469] isSorted fails with predicate "a.length < b.length ? true : a < b"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8469] New: isSorted fails with predicate "a.length < b.length ? true : a < b"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8470] NamedCharacterEntity is missing a \ in lex.html   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8470] New: NamedCharacterEntity is missing a \ in lex.html   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8471] New: std.stdio.readf   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8471] std.stdio.readf   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8471] std.stdio.readf   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8471] std.stdio.readf should be @trusted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8472] New: Replace walkLength() with an improved count()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8473] New: Guaranteed relative key-values with byKey and byValue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8474] bitfields doesn't work with 32 bit fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8474] bitfields doesn't work with bitfield over 31 bits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8474] New: bitfields doesn't work with bitfield over 31 bits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8475] New: postblits fails attributes qualifying when in a template.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8476] float comparison operand not truncated from real   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8476] float comparison operand not truncated from real   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8476] float comparison operand not truncated from real   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8476] float comparison operand not truncated from real   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8476] float comparison operand not truncated from real   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8476] float comparison operand not truncated from real   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8476] New: float comparison operand not truncated from real   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8477] [2.060 beta] Strange error calling member func from overridden Exception::toString()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8477] [2.060 beta] Strange error calling member func from overridden Exception::toString()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8477] [2.060 beta] Strange error calling member func from overridden Exception::toString()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8477] [2.060 beta] Strange error calling member func from overridden Exception::toString()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8477] [2.060 beta] Strange error calling member func from overridden Exception::toString()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8477] [2.060 beta] Strange error calling member func from overridden Exception::toString()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8477] [2.060 beta] Strange error calling member func from overridden Exception::toString()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8477] [2.060 beta] Strange error calling member func from overridden Exception::toString()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8477] [2.060 beta] Strange error calling member func from overridden Exception::toString()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8477] New: [2.060 beta] Strange error calling member func from overridden Exception::toString()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8478] New: Turn some undefined pointer comparisons into compile-time errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8479] dmd and the spec do not match with regards to the list of named character entities that they support   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8479] New: dmd and the spec do not match with regards to the list of named character entities that they support   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8480] New: to!string(BigInt, base) doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8481] assert can't concatenate strings   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8481] New: assert can't concatenate strings   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8482] New: RefCounted fails on opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8482] RefCounted fails on opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8483] Definition of isOutputList warped due to "put" implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8483] New: Definition of isOutputList warped due to "put" implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8484] New: [CTFE] Assertion failure: 'thisval && thisval->op == TOKclassreference' on line 4896 in file 'interpret.c'.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8485] New: referencing a deprecated symbol should never compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8486] New: Possibly wrong interaction of Variant and const arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8486] Possibly wrong interaction of Variant and const arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8486] Possibly wrong interaction of Variant and const arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8487] New: Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8488] New: dmd does not support named HTML entities that contain multiple code points   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• Operations on all array elements => access to memory outside array   fded
• Operations on all array elements => access to memory outside array   fded
• Operations on all array elements => access to memory outside array   Daniel Murphy
• Stopping a StopWatch that's not started   ixid
• Stopping a StopWatch that's not started   David Nadlinger
• Stopping a StopWatch that's not started   ixid

Last message date: Tue Jul 31 22:13:28 PDT 2012
Archived on: Tue Jul 31 22:15:04 PDT 2012

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...