[Issue 8986] The PVS-Studio analyzer has something for you
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Nov 9 04:47:24 PST 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8986
bearophile_hugs at eml.cc changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bearophile_hugs at eml.cc
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc 2012-11-09 04:47:20 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Perhaps there are other errors. I have studied the report unthoughtful. The
> report can be viewed by downloading the PVS-Studio trial version of the
> analyzer. I think trial version will be enough.
Thank you for your valuable work Andrey, we read often your articles linked and
discussed on Reddit. PVS-Studio seems a interesting tool.
D language itself (and not its compilers) is designed to help D programmers
avoid or remove many of the bugs found by PVS-Studio, see as example:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5409
So in a sense D makes tools like PVS-Studio less necessary.
> V519 The 'c2' variable is assigned values twice successively. Perhaps this is a
> mistake. Check lines: 1860, 1861. cod2.c 1861
>
> code *cdcond(elem *e,regm_t *pretregs)
> {
> code *cc,*c,*c1,*cnop1,*c2,*cnop2;
> ....
> c2 = codelem(e22,&retregs,FALSE);
> c2 = cat(c1, fixresult(e22,retregs,pretregs));
> ....
> }
>
> Most likely this is what should be written here: c2 = cat(c2, ....);
That's a bug in the C++ code. Maybe it's possible to add a warning inside the D
compiler to guard against similar bugs in D code.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list