The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

November 2012 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Nov 1 00:30:34 PDT 2012
Ending: Fri Nov 30 23:47:18 PST 2012
Messages: 947

• [Issue 8927] New: Download page should list dependencies   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2837] OPTLINK and LARGEADDRESSAWARE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8222] Optlink crashes when debug info is enabled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4897] CodeView: No locals or parameters are shown when debugging, because of missing function info   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8924] Delegate becomes invalid after a while   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8928] New: Poor error message for derived class without constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8924] Delegate becomes invalid after a while   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8929] New: long.min is a Voldermort literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8929] long.min is a Voldermort literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8929] long.min is a Voldemort literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8929] long.min is a Voldemort literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8905] DList.Range: Internal error, inconsistent state   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8930] New: std.algorithm.move only operates on hasLvalueElements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8931] New: array/slice assignment causes destruction + postblit instead of opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8931] array/slice assignment causes destruction + postblit instead of opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8931] array/slice assignment causes destruction + postblit instead of opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8931] array/slice assignment causes destruction + postblit instead of opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8108] Forward declaration and implementation allowed in same file   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8108] Forward declaration and implementation allowed in same file   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8021] BigInt division bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8021] BigInt division bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1188] Command-line arguments are encoded in CP_ACP on Windows instead of UTF-8   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1188] Command-line arguments are encoded in CP_ACP on Windows instead of UTF-8   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8932] New: [Bugzilla] Version list in advanced search needs to be properly sorted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8932] [Bugzilla] Version list in advanced search needs to be properly sorted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7030] const method mangling of extern(C++) structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7030] const method mangling of extern(C++) structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8912] Error compiling core.memory - possible DDoc problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8498] modifying foreach range iterator fails in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8498] modifying foreach range iterator fails in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7658] [CTFE] assignment to reference in foreach fails without error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8539] -inline failure involving CTFE, nested functions, a ref parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8539] (D1 only) -inline failure involving CTFE, nested functions, a ref parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7688] Ddoc should give a list of inherited members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2837] OPTLINK and LARGEADDRESSAWARE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 198] DDoc: superclass/interface decl expansion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3445] DDoc usually omits attributes (including pure nothrow)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8933] New: -property switch and opDispatch for methods and properties   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2516] DDoc omits static on templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 194] DDoc: method-attributes ignored within templated class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 194] DDoc: method-attributes ignored within templated class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8720] ICE: Assertion failure: '!vthis->csym' on line 727 in file 'glue.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8934] New: Lambda violates DMD assertion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8934] Lambda violates DMD assertion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8934] Lambda violates DMD assertion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8899] Erroneous delegate usage and map template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8935] New: ICE(cod3.c, cod4.c): Returning string literal casted to static array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7354] ld: GOT load reloc does not point to a movq instruction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3142] std.loader documentation missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4495] The -Hd (import file generation directory) option for DMD doesn't work correctly in 2.047.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8808] Header generation must recreate folder structure if -Hd is used   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6249] HTOD deletes files without notice   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6248] HTOD leaves out const when translating C headers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6292] HTOD hides constants behind a comment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8936] New: Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8546] std.array.overlap missing from ddoc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8546] std.array.overlap missing from ddoc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8546] std.array.overlap missing from ddoc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8937] New: import declaration statement without scope after `if` imports to a parent scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8937] import declaration statement without scope after `if` imports to a parent scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8937] import declaration statement without scope after `if` imports to a parent scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8937] import declaration statement without scope after `if` imports to a parent scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8938] New: static struct initializer allows to not explicitly initialize members with disabled constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8939] New: ICE on passing by ref statically initialized const/immutable variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8939] ICE on passing by ref statically initialized const/immutable variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8939] ICE(glue.c) on passing by ref statically initialized const/immutable variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8939] ICE(glue.c) on passing by ref statically initialized const/immutable variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8939] ICE(glue.c) on passing by ref statically initialized const/immutable variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8939] ICE(glue.c) on passing by ref statically initialized const/immutable variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8940] New: Able to modify const/immutable with passing to a templated function by `ref`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8940] Able to modify const/immutable with passing to a templated function by `ref`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8940] Able to modify const/immutable with passing to a templated function by `ref`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8940] Able to modify const/immutable with passing to a templated function by `ref`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8940] Able to modify const/immutable with passing to a templated function by `ref`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8940] Able to modify const/immutable with passing to a templated function by `ref`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8941] New: Documentation for the Yes struct in Phobos std.typecons appears incorrect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8942] New: `alias <qualifier> <type>` ignores <qualifier> in foreach over tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8942] `alias <qualifier> <type>` ignores <qualifier> in foreach over tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8942] `alias <qualifier> <type>` ignores <qualifier> in foreach over tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8942] `alias <qualifier> <type>` ignores <qualifier> in foreach over tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8943] New: Cannot get parent of an overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8943] Cannot get parent of an overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8943] Cannot get parent of an overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8943] Cannot get parent of an overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8944] New: Loosing const from shared const type when unqualifying in foreach over tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8945] New: Can't call static struct initializer or constructor without qualifier for templated inner struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8945] Can't call static struct initializer or constructor without qualifier for templated inner struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8945] Can't call static struct initializer or constructor without qualifier for templated inner struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 198] DDoc: superclass/interface decl expansion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8946] New: « any » function does not what it should do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8946] « any » function does not what it should do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8946] « any » function does not what it should do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8946] « any » function does not what it should do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8946] « any » function does not what it should do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8946] « any » function does not what it should do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8946] « any » function does not what it should do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8946] « any » function does not what it should do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8946] « any » function does not what it should do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8946] « any » function does not what it should do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8946] « any » function does not what it should do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8946] « any » function does not what it should do   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8947] New: redBlackTree() of fixed size arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8948] New: Make error message more readable when assigning function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8949] New: [CTFE] Internal Compiler Error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8949] [CTFE] Internal Compiler Error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6214] Don't influence foreach iteration on range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6652] foreach parameter with number range is always ref   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8950] New: postblit not called on const static array initialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8951] New: static array of context pointer struct s fails:   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8951] static array of context pointer struct s fails:   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8951] static array of context pointer struct s fails:   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8951] static array of context pointer struct s fails:   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8952] New: nested structs with conext pointers fail   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8952] nested structs with conext pointers fail   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8952] nested structs with conext pointers fail   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8953] New: Parser rejects qualifier after destructor i.e. `~this() <qualifier> { }`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8954] New: Missing line number in error message for uncollable destructor/postblit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5314] Wrong error message: struct within immutable member and postblit function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8926] post-blit copy constructor conflicts with generic opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4424] Copy constructor and templated opAssign cannot coexist   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8906] attribute inference failure with opAssign and alias this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8955] New: Can't have qualified field with not-qualified constructor/postblit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8955] Can't have qualified field with not-qualified constructor/postblit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8956] New: Ability to break typesystem with constructor/postblit/destructor (e.g. modify immutable)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8956] Ability to break typesystem with constructor/postblit/destructor (e.g. modify immutable)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8956] Ability to break typesystem with constructor/postblit/destructor (e.g. modify immutable)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4338] Structs with non-const destructors cannot be used as const parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4867] [GSoC] Postblit is not usable with const objects   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6652] foreach parameter with number range is always ref   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8957] New: Closure not recognized when passing type with post-blit as lazy parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8957] Closure not recognized when passing type with post-blit as lazy parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8957] Closure not recognized when passing type with post-blit as lazy parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8957] Closure not recognized when passing type with post-blit as lazy parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8958] New: [RFC] Make constructors/postblits/destructors work correctly with const/immutable qualifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8959] New: IsExpression should support syntax which has no Identifier in all cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8959] IsExpression should support syntax which has no Identifier in all cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8959] IsExpression should support syntax which has no Identifier in all cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8057] std.algorithm.move cannot use for nested struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8067] std.algorithm.move doesn't work for static array of elaborate struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8057] std.algorithm.move cannot use for nested struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8926] post-blit copy constructor conflicts with generic opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6101] Documentation for dead modules still distributed with DMD   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8414] with statement causes linker error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8868] overload resolution of &x.g() incorrectly chooses delegate over function pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8887] static arrays passed by value in extern C/C++ functions should not compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8887] static arrays passed by value in extern C/C++ functions should not compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8898] false positive dangling else warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8960] New: DMD 2.061 git head: Unable to set thread priority   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2296] IFTI with parameterization on fixed array size does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3530] A case where IFTI works with int but not enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8325] IFTI on non-function templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8961] New: IFTI fails with templates in specialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8796] Optimizer bug on 64bit: *p++=1 where p is a parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8962] New: std.variant.Algebraic should support duplicate types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8963] New: "Forward reference" error when deriving the function name using __traits() inside an "auto"-return function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8963] "Forward reference" error when deriving the function name using __traits() inside an "auto"-return function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8964] New: One infinite loop with foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8965] New: Implement mixin template for forwading constructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8966] New: ICE when passing cfloat argument with indirection   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8966] ICE(cgcod.c) when passing cfloat argument with indirection   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8966] ICE(cgcod.c) when passing cfloat argument with indirection   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8966] ICE(cgcod.c) when passing cfloat argument with indirection   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7900] CTFE Internal error with -inline and associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7940] CTFE wrong-code for opAssign and std.array.Appender   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8967] New: dirEntries throws when encountering a "long path" on windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8967] dirEntries throws when encountering a "long path" on windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8968] New: std.traits.ParameterIdentifierTuple is undocumented and doesn't work with ref params   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8968] std.traits.ParameterIdentifierTuple is undocumented and doesn't work with ref params   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8968] std.traits.ParameterIdentifierTuple is undocumented and doesn't work with ref params   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8969] New: is(T == __parameters) is undocumented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8969] is(T == __parameters) is undocumented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8857] [CTFE] does not evaluate to a boolean, only with -inline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8923] Destructors of struct members get called at the wrong point   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8923] Destructors of struct members get called at the wrong point   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8923] Destructors of struct members get called at the wrong point   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8688] Qualified indexing type tuple returns wrong result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8917] Array operation a[] + a[] not implemented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8970] New: Tuple should support conversion from tuple with unnamed fields to tuple with named fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8970] Tuple should support conversion from tuple with unnamed fields to tuple with named fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8897] Regression: 'has forward references' error for static class after template mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8850] Nested struct creation by a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8850] Nested struct creation by a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8850] Nested struct creation by a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8897] Regression: 'has forward references' error for static class after template mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8863] struct passed to template: cannot access frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8971] New: __traits(getOverloads) fails in a member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8971] __traits(getOverloads) fails in a member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8971] __traits(getOverloads) fails in a member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8971] __traits(getOverloads) fails in a member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8971] __traits(getOverloads) fails in a member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8971] __traits(getOverloads) fails in a member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8917] Array operation a[] + a[] not implemented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8972] New: foreach fails on __traits(getOverloads) in a struct member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8972] __traits fails in a struct member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8972] __traits fails in a struct member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8972] __traits fails in a struct member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8972] __traits fails in a struct member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8972] __traits fails in a struct member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8973] New: core.cpuid.coresPerCPU returning incorrect value.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8850] Nested struct creation by a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5996] ICE(expression.c) CTFE of erroneous auto return function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5996] ICE(expression.c) CTFE of erroneous auto return function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8974] New: closure delegate might break preceding code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8974] closure delegate might break preceding code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8975] New: array scalar assign broken for cfloat   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8850] Nested struct creation by a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7940] CTFE wrong-code for opAssign and std.array.Appender   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7940] CTFE wrong-code for opAssign and std.array.Appender   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7940] CTFE wrong-code for opAssign and std.array.Appender   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8272] [Ddoc] Recursive macro expansion is failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8272] [Ddoc] Recursive macro expansion is failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2273] Whitespace is not inserted after commas   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2273] Whitespace is not inserted after commas   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2273] Whitespace is not inserted after commas   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6963] pure/nothrow inference doesn't work for function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6332] Auto-return function cannot be inferred as @safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6356] Pure/nothrow/@safe-inference failed for a template function if it is instantiated without evaluating at the global scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8976] New: __traits(compiles, ...) causes error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8976] __traits(compiles, ...) causes error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8976] __traits(compiles, ...) causes error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8976] __traits(compiles, ...) causes error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8976] __traits(compiles, ...) causes error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8977] New: Ability to break typesystem with static struct initializer (e.g. modify immutable)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2962] ICE(glue.c) or bad codegen passing variable as template value parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8978] New: Constructor is called instead of implicit cast when initializing from expression tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8978] Constructor is called instead of implicit cast when initializing from expression tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8979] New: Can't initialize multidimensional static array with its element   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8980] New: no implicit cast to const for AA   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8923] Nested structs have null context pointers in static array variables and struct fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8923] Nested structs have null context pointers in static array variables and struct fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8923] Nested structs have null context pointers in static array variables and struct fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8981] New: bool and %s don't honor formating flags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8923] Nested structs have null context pointers in static array variables and struct fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5641] Local instantiation does not save context properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7965] Invalid outer function scope pointer in some cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8539] (D1 only) -inline failure involving CTFE, nested functions, a ref parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8539] (D1 only) -inline failure involving CTFE, nested functions, a ref parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3144] (D1 only) Invalid break accepted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4283] (D1 only) static if with dangling else clause   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8891] (D1 only) non-static opCall runs in initialization incorrectly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8917] Array operation a[] + a[] not implemented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6356] Pure/nothrow/@safe-inference failed for a template function if it is instantiated without evaluating at the global scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8906] attribute inference failure with opAssign and alias this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8982] New: Assertion failure: '0' on line 353 in file 'ctfeexpr.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8982] Assertion failure: '0' on line 353 in file 'ctfeexpr.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8982] Assertion failure: '0' on line 353 in file 'ctfeexpr.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8983] New: Overload introduced behind mixin template can't be called from another overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8983] Overload introduced behind mixin template can't be called from another overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8983] Overload introduced behind mixin template can't be called from another overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8983] Overload introduced behind mixin template can't be called from another overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8983] Overload introduced behind mixin template can't be called from another overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8983] Overload introduced behind mixin template can't be called from another overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8983] Overload introduced behind mixin template can't be called from another overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8983] Overload introduced behind mixin template can't be called from another overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8983] Overload introduced behind mixin template can't be called from another overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8984] New: Dynamic array key for associative array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8639] dmd buffer overflow related to function literal, real.max, template alias parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8985] New: __parameters tuple string strips off the scope of default args   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8639] dmd buffer overflow related to function literal, real.max, template alias parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8639] dmd buffer overflow related to function literal, real.max, template alias parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8775] 2.059 worked 2.060 does not: Range Violation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8526] DMD 2.060 regression: anonymous delegate call in foreach loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8526] DMD 2.060 regression: anonymous delegate call in foreach loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8340] *= operator breaks long array in x64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8526] DMD 2.060 regression: anonymous delegate call in foreach loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8340] *= operator breaks long array in x64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8446] Can't use 'this' pointer in pure member function?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8340] *= operator breaks long array in x64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8340] *= operator breaks long array in x64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8340] *= operator breaks long array in x64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8526] DMD 2.060 regression: anonymous delegate call in foreach loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6141] Bad code with ref-foreach and closures   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8093] Returning ref from delegate foreach gives bad address   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8897] Regression: 'has forward references' error for static class after template mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8897] Regression: 'has forward references' error for static class after template mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4019] [CTFE] Adding an item to an empty AA   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8894] 2.059: Lookup error message has become uninformative   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8526] DMD 2.060 regression: anonymous delegate call in foreach loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6141] Bad code with ref-foreach and closures   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8986] New: The PVS-Studio analyzer has something for you   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8986] The PVS-Studio analyzer has something for you   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8986] The PVS-Studio analyzer has something for you   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8986] The PVS-Studio analyzer has something for you   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8986] The PVS-Studio analyzer has something for you   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8986] The PVS-Studio analyzer has something for you   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8526] DMD 2.060 regression: anonymous delegate call in foreach loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6141] Bad code with ref-foreach and closures   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8093] Returning ref from delegate foreach gives bad address   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1495] frontend optimization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8376] 64 bit codegen bug involving dynamically indexed static array and continue statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6962] Wrong Code With Scope Exit + By-Ref Parameters, only with -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8376] 64 bit codegen bug involving dynamically indexed static array and continue statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8987] New: Compiling using "-O -release" options yeild "Internal error: backend\cgcod.c 1663"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8987] Compiling using "-O -release" options yeild "Internal error: backend\cgcod.c 1663"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8987] Compiling using '-O -release' options yield 'Internal error: backend\cgcod.c 1663'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8987] Compiling using '-O -release' options yield 'Internal error: backend\cgcod.c 1663'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8093] Returning ref from delegate foreach gives bad address   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5832] Template alias parameters are never successfully pattern matched   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8988] New: Segfault in tricky CTFE scenario   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8988] Segfault in tricky CTFE scenario   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8446] Can't use 'this' pointer in pure member function?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8606] import std.string causes Optlink 'Error 32: Data Outside Segment Bounds : _DATA'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8376] 64 bit codegen bug involving dynamically indexed static array and continue statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8376] 64 bit codegen bug involving dynamically indexed static array and continue statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8989] New: cfloat argument passing broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8989] cfloat argument passing broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6969] Forward reference on template class triangle   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8990] New: Forward reference error on three structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8990] Forward reference error on three structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8990] Forward reference error on three structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8990] Forward reference error on three structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8990] Forward reference error on three structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8990] Forward reference error on three structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8990] Forward reference error on three structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8990] Forward reference error on three structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6969] Forward reference on template class triangle   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6969] Forward reference on template class triangle   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5832] Template alias parameters are never successfully pattern matched   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8991] New: adding a __ctfe branch with return to a function breaks NRVO   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8991] adding a __ctfe branch with return to a function breaks NRVO   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8991] adding a __ctfe branch with return to a function breaks NRVO   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8991] adding a __ctfe branch with return to a function breaks NRVO   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8991] adding a __ctfe branch with return to a function breaks NRVO   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8992] New: __traits(compileError)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8992] __traits(compileError)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8992] __traits(compileError)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8993] New: Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8993] Implement unique references/isolated memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7420] Duplicate "cannot be read at compile time" error messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8994] New: typeof fails when passing delegate as alias parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8994] typeof fails when passing delegate as alias parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8994] typeof fails when passing delegate as alias parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8994] typeof fails when passing delegate as alias parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5832] Template alias parameters are never successfully pattern matched   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8899] Erroneous delegate usage and map template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8857] [CTFE] does not evaluate to a boolean, only with -inline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8857] [CTFE] does not evaluate to a boolean, only with -inline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6588] Struct d'tors + immutable elements doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8376] 64 bit codegen bug involving dynamically indexed static array and continue statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8995] New: `is(<Type> <Identifier> == function)` creates tuple with parameter storage classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8995] `is(<Type> <Identifier> == function)` creates tuple with parameter storage classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7019] implicit constructors are inconsistently allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8376] 64 bit codegen bug involving dynamically indexed static array and continue statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8996] New: [ICE](e2ir.c line 768) with bigint main-imported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8996] [ICE](e2ir.c line 768) with bigint main-imported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8996] [ICE](e2ir.c line 768) with bigint main-imported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8997] New: template instances omit symbol that may be used in other modules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8997] template instances omit symbol that may be used in other modules   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8998] New: 'inout pure' returns immutable, which in reality is mutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8349] CTFE memcpy Error with ctRegex   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8999] New: Closure not detected for reference paramters of templated functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 8999] Closure not detected for reference paramters of templated functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6768] Problem with init of struct members in presence of templated opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9000] New: ICE on assigning struct's `init` to enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9000] ICE on assigning struct's `init` to enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9000] ICE on assigning struct's `init` to enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9000] ICE on assigning struct's `init` to enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9001] New: ICE on assigning expression tuple element with struct's `init` to enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9001] ICE on assigning expression tuple element with struct's `init` to enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7303] Erroneous closure behavior   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7303] Erroneous closure behavior   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7303] Erroneous closure behavior   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1841] Closure detection doesn't work when variable is used in a nested function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9002] New: Document that `S s = S(...); ` will not create temporaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1841] Closure detection doesn't work when variable is used in a nested function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9003] New: Nested structs smetimes have null context pointers in static struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9003] Nested structs smetimes have null context pointers in static struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9003] Nested structs smetimes have null context pointers in static struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9003] Nested structs smetimes have null context pointers in static struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9004] New: Wrong line number for undefined identifier error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9004] Wrong line number for undefined identifier error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9004] Wrong line number for undefined identifier error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9004] Wrong line number for undefined identifier error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9004] Wrong line number for undefined identifier error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9004] Wrong line number for undefined identifier error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9005] New: std.concurrency.spawn should allow `void delegate(Args) shared` for new Tid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9005] std.concurrency.spawn should allow `void delegate(Args) shared` for new Tid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9006] New: Static struct with nested struct fields sometimes has current context pointers in `init`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9006] Static struct with nested struct fields sometimes has current context pointers in `init`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9006] Static struct with nested struct fields sometimes has current context pointers in `init`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9006] Static struct with nested struct fields sometimes has current context pointers in `init`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7220] Bad initialization when using mixin to generate a static field in a -lib'rary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1599] compile time evaluation with immutable problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1734] Inconsistent mixin behaviour   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2057] Unexpected type names with template typedefs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9007] New: DMD-head Warnings about missing curl.lib when using -unittest   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1944] is-expressions don't correctly define tuples named in the match expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2128] Template function argument binding is too restrictive wrt qualifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9008] New: Another forward referencing bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9008] Another forward referencing bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9008] Another forward referencing bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9008] Another forward referencing bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9008] Another forward referencing bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9008] Another forward referencing bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9008] Another forward referencing bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9009] New: allow foreach without identifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8570] Tuples without named fields should implicitly convert to tuples with named fields when returned from a function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9010] New: opEquals() const results in not-covered code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9010] opEquals() const results in not-covered code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9010] opEquals() const results in not-covered code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7003] no tuple expansion for c++ mangling   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9011] New: One more strongly pure case   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9011] One more strongly pure case   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9011] One more strongly pure case   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9012] New: writef/format inconsistent with format specifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9012] writef/format inconsistent with format specifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9012] writef/format inconsistent with format specifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9012] writef/format inconsistent with format specifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9013] New: Compiler crash with foreach on wrongly defined interval   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9013] Compiler crash with foreach on wrongly defined interval   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9013] Compiler crash with foreach on wrongly defined interval   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9013] Compiler crash with foreach on wrongly defined interval   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8408] Purity calculation should be improved   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7220] Bad initialization when using mixin to generate a static field in a -lib'rary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9014] New: [ICE](glue.c line 1225) with array.front and missing array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9014] ICE(glue.c) line 1225: with array.front and missing array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9014] ICE(glue.c) line 1225: with array.front and missing array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9014] ICE(glue.c) line 1225: with array.front and missing array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9015] New: std.container.DList.opOpAssign missing return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9016] New: swap() doesn't work with std.container.DList.front and back   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9017] New: __traits(compiles, { enum e = <expression tuple>; }) is true but code doesn't compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7220] Bad initialization when using mixin to generate a static field in a -lib'rary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7220] Bad initialization when using mixin to generate a static field in a -lib'rary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 620] Can't use property syntax with a template function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 785] Make 'cent' and 'ucent' syntactically valid pending implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 855] Improve performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 790] arbitrary lookahead for nested functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8846] Specs for Inline Assembler don't include cmpxchg16b   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 855] Improve performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5363] const + alias this = wrong code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6969] Forward reference on template class triangle   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 785] Make 'cent' and 'ucent' syntactically valid pending implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7041] [PATCH] Add -di option to show deprecated errors as warnings   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8720] ICE(glue.c, !vthis->csym)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8436] ICE(toir.c 178)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9018] New: __traits(compiles, ...) is true on second check for same incompilable code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9018] __traits(compiles, ...) is true on second check for same incompilable code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9018] __traits(compiles, ...) is true on second check for same incompilable code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6969] Forward reference on template class triangle   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6969] Forward reference on template class triangle   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6652] foreach parameter with number range is always ref   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9019] New: invariant does not compile/run if class does not define constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9019] invariant does not compile/run if class does not define constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9019] invariant does not compile/run if class does not define constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9019] invariant does not compile/run if class does not define constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9020] New: This pointer is not the same in constructor as it is in methods   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9020] This pointer is not the same in constructor as it is in invariant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9020] This pointer is not the same in constructor as it is in invariant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9020] This pointer is not the same in constructor as it is in invariant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9021] New: Casting a class pointer to size_t and back does not return the same value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9021] Casting a class pointer to size_t and back does not return the same value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9021] Casting a class pointer to size_t and back does not return the same value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9022] New: IFTI should support enclosing type/scope deduction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9022] IFTI should support enclosing type/scope deduction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9022] IFTI should support enclosing type/scope deduction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9022] IFTI should support enclosing type/scope deduction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9022] IFTI should support enclosing type/scope deduction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9022] IFTI should support enclosing type/scope deduction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8894] 2.059: Lookup error message has become uninformative   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8863] struct passed to template: cannot access frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8416] Assertion failure: '0' on line 2018 in file 'interpret.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8303] [ICE] (interpret.c, line 100) Maybe caused by a closure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8863] struct passed to template: cannot access frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8863] struct passed to template: cannot access frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8863] struct passed to template: cannot access frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8863] struct passed to template: cannot access frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8863] struct passed to template: cannot access frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9023] New: CTFE: cannot use ~= on an empty AA.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4019] [CTFE] Adding an item to an empty AA   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8863] struct passed to template: cannot access frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7632] [64bit] byValue() for associative arrays doesn't return the correct values   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8175] aa.c assert(0)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7632] [64bit] byValue() for associative arrays doesn't return the correct values   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8583] [64 bit] AA ushort[dchar] byValue range is corrupted on x86_64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9024] New: Inferring function argument types from other template parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9024] Inferring function argument types from other template parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7954] x86_64 Windows fibers do not save nonvolatile XMM registers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9025] New: core.thread.Fiber seems to crash on Win64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9025] core.thread.Fiber seems to crash on Win64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9025] core.thread.Fiber seems to crash on Win64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9025] core.thread.Fiber seems to crash on Win64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9025] core.thread.Fiber seems to crash on Win64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9025] core.thread.Fiber seems to crash on Win64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9026] New: Template mixin identifier as template alias parameter doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9026] Template mixin identifier as template alias parameter doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9026] Template mixin identifier as template alias parameter doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9026] Template mixin identifier as template alias parameter doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8688] Qualified indexing type tuple returns wrong result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8702] tuple(tuple(1)) fails to compile, but tuple(tuple(1), 1) works   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8617] std.typecons.Proxy.opEquals compiles error: undefined identifier 'startsWith'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8645] ICE: Assertion failed: (0), function totym, file glue.c, line 1150.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8629] UFCS resolution prints fake error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8522] Comparison operator overloading doesn't consider the qualifier of lhs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6772] Cannot pass cfloat argument type to a function on x86_64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8517] ICE(toir.c 178) or stack overflow with recursive alias template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6774] ICE(glue.c) totym gagged forward reference error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 519] Invariant not called from autogenerated class/struct constructor/destructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6263] Ambiguous declaration using typeof and an overloaded function is accepted.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7549] typeof of overloaded function picks the lexically first one   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8780] std.traits.ReturnType of overloaded functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9027] New: Getting address of overloaded function using `cast` selects the lexically first one if there is no match   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9027] Getting address of overloaded function using `cast` selects the lexically first one if there is no match   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4565] In array literals single values can replace arrays of length 1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4565] In array literals single values can replace arrays of length 1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9028] New: `main` is trated sometimes as having C linkage and sometimes as having D linkage   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9028] `main` is trated sometimes as having C linkage and sometimes as having D linkage   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9028] `main` is trated sometimes as having C calling convention and sometimes as having D convention   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9028] `main` is trated sometimes as having C calling convention and sometimes as having D convention   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9028] `main` is trated sometimes as having C calling convention and sometimes as having D convention   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9029] New: Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3546] Aliasing an element of a static array should be legal if the index is a compile time constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3011] alias should have assignment syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8491] alias basic type in template paramter unable pass complie   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9030] New: immutable `_d_args` can be written to with `main(char[][])`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9030] immutable `_d_args` can be written to with `main(char[][])`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9030] immutable `_d_args` can be written to with `main(char[][])`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9031] New: No error line number with not callable postblit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6962] Wrong Code With Scope Exit + By-Ref Parameters, only with -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5507] countUntil should take Ranges... instead of R2   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3011] alias should have assignment syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6426] ICE(toir.c) with function-nested alias   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5249] Strongly pure random generator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9032] New: Verify some documentation comments when -w or -wi is used   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8284] [std.container] can't define Array!T, if T is Tuple!(size_t, size_t)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6962] Wrong Code With Scope Exit and Array Parameter, only with -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1951] Remove SFINAE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8720] ICE(glue.c, !vthis->csym)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1951] Remove SFINAE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1012] cannot instantiate template with no or default arguments without !()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9033] New: Remove __thread from the language   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9033] Remove __thread from the language   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9034] New: errors of conversions in format.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9034] errors of conversions in format.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9034] errors of conversions in format.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9035] New: Nested struct `init` is lvalue and can be modified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9035] Nested struct `init` is lvalue and can be modified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7947] typeof on anonymous function literal returns void   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1012] cannot instantiate template with no or default arguments without !()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1012] cannot instantiate template with no or default arguments without !()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1012] cannot instantiate template with no or default arguments without !()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9036] New: postblit is called for nested structs when assigning `init`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9036] postblit is called for nested structs when assigning `init`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9036] postblit is called for nested structs when assigning `init`   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7220] Bad initialization when using mixin to generate a static field in a -lib'rary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4427] __traits should have isFunction, isVariable, etc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4427] __traits should have isFunction, isVariable, etc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9037] New: DDoc: Chokes on consecutive example sections:   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9039] New: __vector() support in template type resolution   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9039] __vector() support in template type resolution   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9039] __vector() support in template type resolution   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9039] __vector() support in template type resolution   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9039] __vector() support in template type resolution   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9040] New: Assertion `precedence[e->op] != PREC_zero' failed instantiating anonymous class at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9040] Assertion `precedence[e->op] != PREC_zero' failed instantiating anonymous class at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4427] __traits should have isFunction, isVariable, etc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9041] New: "Need 'this' to access member" of inner class in typeid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9042] New: Self-import with mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4427] __traits should have isFunction, isVariable, etc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9043] New: std.variant: Crash on comparing unordered types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9043] std.variant: Crash on comparing unordered types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9043] std.variant: Crash on comparing unordered types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7990] Assertion failure in std.variant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7990] Assertion failure in std.variant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7998] static assert message string printing problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7998] static assert message string printing problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8685] sha1UUID does not show up on http://dlang.org/phobos/std_uuid.html   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9044] New: Random "Previous Definition Different" optlink failure (looks like a buffer overflow bug somewhere)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9038] Template mixin identifier as template alias parameter issue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9038] Template mixin identifier as template alias parameter issue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9045] New: Feature rest for std.asscii => function isNewline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9045] Feature request for std.asscii => function isNewline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9045] Feature request for std.asscii => function isNewline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9045] Feature request for std.asscii => function isNewline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9045] Feature request for std.asscii => function isNewline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9045] Feature request for std.asscii => function isNewline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9045] Feature request for std.asscii => function isNewline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9045] Feature request for std.asscii => function isNewline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9045] Feature request for std.asscii => function isNewline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9045] Feature request for std.asscii => function isNewline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9046] New: typeof(T.init) should have the type T   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9046] typeof(T.init) should have the type T   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9046] typeof(T.init) should have the type T   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9046] typeof(T.init) should have the type T   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9046] typeof(T.init) should have the type T   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9046] typeof(T.init) should have the type T   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9046] typeof(T.init) should have the type T   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8888] enums with initializers inside functions cause linker error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7398] spell checker should suppress error messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6058] Contract inheritance causes compiler error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5423] d:\m\d\scregexp\trunk\scregexp.d(158): Error: template instance scregexp.screg!("^[)\\]}>]$") recursive expansion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2343] unified function call syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7017] Pure inference makes inconsistent result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9047] New: Bad error message with power ^^ operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9048] New: Error: base classes expected instead of typeof when instantiating anonymous class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9048] Error: base classes expected instead of typeof when instantiating anonymous class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9048] Error: base classes expected instead of typeof when instantiating anonymous class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7017] Pure inference makes inconsistent result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7159] Forward reference when casting auto return method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5933] Cannot retrieve the return type of an auto-return member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6207] Mixin template evaluated to string can convert to string mixin expression implicitly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1427] Generated .di files look ugly and are hard to read   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1427] Generated .di files look ugly and are hard to read   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5679] Type aliasing "this" from an access function defined in base class confuses the compiler about the type of objects   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 391] .sort and .reverse break utf8 encoding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 391] .sort and .reverse break utf8 encoding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 391] .sort and .reverse break utf8 encoding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5550] std.range.enumerate()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1188] Command-line arguments are encoded in CP_ACP on Windows instead of UTF-8   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9049] New: std.typecons.Proxy doesn't treat ref parameter correctly.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9049] std.typecons.Proxy doesn't treat ref parameter correctly.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9049] std.typecons.Proxy doesn't treat ref parameter correctly.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8441] function expected, not <my function>   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9050] New: compiler crash on return type inference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7444] Require [] for array copies too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9051] New: [CTFE] Working with non-trivial immutable globals?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9051] Passing an immutable global with post-blit to a CTFE function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9051] Passing an immutable global with post-blit to a CTFE function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9051] Passing an immutable global with post-blit to a CTFE function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1353] Can't use typeof() in base class list.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1246] "module in multiple packages" error needs fixing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1456] Cannot use a constant with alias template parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1481] add final on template function cause local variable be finaled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1863] better error message: Error: hidden method called for <some class>   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4658] Support needed for new x86 and x86_64 instructions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5990] Phobos Win64 - D1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5991] druntime Win64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5992] Phobos Win64 - D2   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2167] incorrect behaviour of IsExpression on invalid template instance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 965] `is(<uncompilable template>)` is true and doesn't gap errors if not in a function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 785] Make 'cent' and 'ucent' syntactically valid pending implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9052] New: [2.061 alpha] AA.length in a const context tries to call opAssign + no error line number   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9053] New: Can't overload functions with mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9053] Can't overload functions with mixin   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 785] Make 'cent' and 'ucent' syntactically valid pending implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 785] Make 'cent' and 'ucent' syntactically valid pending implementation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7192] improve error message for "object.d cannot be read"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7192] improve error message for "object.d cannot be read"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9054] New: std.net.curl byLineAsync and byChunkAsync broken.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7444] Require [] for array copies too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8366] Overriding const member function in conjunction with mutable overload causes a strange error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3449] const and invariant struct members do not behave according to spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9055] New: Compiler bails out on initializing a variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9055] Compiler bails out on initializing a variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9055] Compiler bails out on initializing a variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9055] Compiler bails out on initializing a variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9055] Compiler bails out on initializing a variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9055] [CTFE] Compiler segfaults on paren-free auto-return forward referenced member function call on nonexistent 'this' receiver   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5893] Allow simple aliases for operator overloading   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9056] New: More precise error messages when function arguments are wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• CTFE Memory Hogging Workaround?   Maxime Chevalier
  • CTFE Memory Hogging Workaround?   Jonathan M Davis
  • CTFE Memory Hogging Workaround?   bearophile
• [Issue 9057] New: Non-constant expression error in biguintcore   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9057] Regression(Beta): Segfault or "Non-constant expression" error with local import   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9058] New: Problem with std.traits.EnumMembers conversion to array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9058] Problem with std.traits.EnumMembers conversion to array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9059] New: No exception runtime error message with missing file + byLine   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9060] New: std.range.chain and std.range.zip cannot get frame pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9061] New: BigInt | BigInt, BigInt & int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9062] New: AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9062] AddrExp should distinguish the existence of property resolution.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9063] New: static assert should resolve property function call   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9063] static assert should resolve property function call   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9063] static assert should resolve property function call   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8650] SLice opOpAssign SLice with overlap does not throw   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9064] New: Add isInstanceOf to std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9064] Add isInstanceOf to std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9064] Add isInstanceOf to std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9064] Add isInstanceOf to std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9065] New: Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9065] Please consider adding these std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9066] New: Implement constructor forwarding template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9066] Implement constructor forwarding template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9067] New: Can't assign values from privately included modules to enums.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9068] New: ICE when trying to break outer loop from inside switch statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8602] Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9069] New: struct literals are treated as lvalues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9069] struct literals are treated as lvalues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9069] struct literals are treated as lvalues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9069] struct literals are treated as lvalues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9069] struct literals are treated as lvalues   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9070] New: nothrow of constructer/destructor isn't correct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9070] nothrow of constructer/destructor isn't correct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9071] New: sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9071] sort function won't compile but Range fits describtion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4427] __traits should have isFunction, isVariable, etc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8733] Normalize -of path on Windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8819] void static array should have init built-in propert   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9072] New: some tests from the dmd test suite actually test the library, not the compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9073] New: In manifest constant initializer, && and || should evaluate their operands lazily.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9073] In manifest constant initializer, && and || should evaluate their operands lazily.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9074] New: Can't use range functions with Appender   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9075] New: core.stdc.float_ is broken with -w switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9075] core.stdc.float_ is broken with -w switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9075] core.stdc.float_ is broken with -w switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9075] core.stdc.float_ is broken with -w switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9076] New: Aliased template function and property resolution doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9076] Aliased template function and property resolution doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9077] New: Struct copy constructor ignored when opAssign with a different type is present   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9078] New: non-static opCall is chosen instead of a default constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9078] non-static opCall is chosen instead of a default constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9079] New: 'delete this' no longer compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9079] 'delete this' no longer compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9079] 'delete this' no longer compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9080] New: DMD compile ambiguous code or doesn’t even warn   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9080] Reject effect-free assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8596] Indeterministic assertion failure in rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9081] New: Modules shouldn't have a type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9081] Modules shouldn't have a type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6498] [CTFE] copy-on-write is slow and causes huge memory usage   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8602] ICE(mtype.c) string mixin + auto return type + template tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8383] 64-bit ABI: unions not the same size as in C in some situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9082] New: join should accept types which are not ranges as the separator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9082] Add "interleave" function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9083] New: mixin expression on template argument doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9083] mixin expression on template argument doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9083] mixin expression on template argument doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8383] 64-bit ABI: unions not the same size as in C in some situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9084] New: Structs assignment and associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9085] New: allow for iteration of const(V[K]) without casts   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8802] Problem with enums of void*   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8802] Problem with enums of void*   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8802] Problem with enums of void*   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4596] [tdpl] Rebinding *this* in class method compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4596] [tdpl] Rebinding *this* in class method compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9086] New: std.typecons.appendIfNotNull() or a better idea   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9087] New: Value modified in foreach warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9087] Value modified in foreach warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9087] Value modified in foreach warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9087] Value modified in foreach warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9087] Value modified in foreach warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9087] Value modified in foreach warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9087] Value modified in foreach warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9087] Value modified in foreach warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9087] Value modified in foreach warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9087] Value modified in foreach warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9087] Value modified in foreach warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9088] New: static static   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9088] static static   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9088] static static   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9089] New: Very restrictive Tuple constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5168] String enums don't work with -g compiler switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8802] Problem with enums of void*   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9090] New: auto ref doesn't work with arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8153] Warning about toHash signature is incorrect on x86_64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8602] ICE(mtype.c) string mixin + auto return type + template tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8602] ICE(mtype.c) string mixin + auto return type + template tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9091] New: Perhaps another forward referencing bug.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9091] Perhaps another forward referencing bug.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9091] Perhaps another forward referencing bug.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9091] Using __traits(getMember) on template argument fails inside member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9091] Using __traits(getMember) on template argument fails inside member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• std.file.write versus std.stdio.write   dsmith
  • possible correction -- Re: std.file.write versus std.stdio.write   dsmith
  • std.file.write versus std.stdio.write   Jonathan M Davis
• [Issue 5380] Subtyping with "alias this" doesn't mix with regular inheritance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5380] Subtyping with "alias this" doesn't mix with regular inheritance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8120] std.conv.to throws exception when converting const string to int with -O optimisation switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8120] std.conv.to throws exception when converting const string to int with -O optimisation switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9092] New: GC.extend allocates less then it reports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9092] GC.extend allocates less then it reports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9092] GC.extend allocates less then it reports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9093] New: Overloads in extern(C++) interfaces throw up COMDAT errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9093] Overloads in extern(C++) interfaces throw up COMDAT errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8120] std.conv.to throws exception when converting const string to int with -O optimisation switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9094] New: GC not collecting under Windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9094] GC not collecting under Windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9094] GC not collecting under Windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9094] GC not collecting under Windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7287] std.container.BinaryHeap example fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6835] Code pattern: uniq on an array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4929] DirEntry does not always report correct type of file on linux   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5168] String enums don't work with -g compiler switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9095] New: [ICE](statement.c line 5037) with throw in nonthrow function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4415] code generation for std.all fails on fedora   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6373] More descriptive 'hidden by X is deprecated' error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5043] writeln with empty arrays should write something useful   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9096] New: comsub bug with chained function calls, optimization and attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9096] comsub bug with chained function calls, optimization and attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9097] New: Value range propagation to disable some array bound tests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9098] New: Error with ddoc: octal digit expected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4561] D2 Language Docs: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/function.html   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5358] std.functional.binaryReverseArgs missing from documentation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8918] Wrong sized literal assigned to fixed size literal error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8892] Not precise error message with failed fixed size array assign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7900] CTFE Internal error with -inline and associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9099] New: segfault while returning an atomicLoad value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9099] segfault while returning an atomicLoad value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8847] voldemort + inout confuses "is"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6949] no warning or error if unsigned variable is compared to 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7440] ctRegex does not work when using alternatives ('|') involving a '+' inside non-capturing group ('(?:…)')   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8349] CTFE memcpy Error with ctRegex   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7810] [CTFE] Typesafe variadic function with array of structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9100] New: Weird behavior on template instance argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9100] Weird behavior on template instance argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9100] Weird behavior on template instance argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9100] Weird behavior on template instance argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 9100] Weird behavior on template instance argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8847] voldemort + inout confuses "is"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8847] voldemort + inout confuses "is"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com

Last message date: Fri Nov 30 23:47:18 PST 2012
Archived on: Fri Nov 30 23:50:13 PST 2012

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...