http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5363
jens.k.mueller at gmx.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jens.k.mueller at gmx.de
OS/Version|Windows |All
Severity|critical |blocker
--- Comment #4 from jens.k.mueller at gmx.de 2012-11-13 02:36:38 PST ---
Today I ran into this bug. Unfortunately it tooks quite some time until I had a
minimal example that exemplified the problem. Then I could search the database
to find this report here.
I leave my minimal example here for reference.
struct A
{
B b;
alias b this;
}
struct B
{
static struct Value
{
}
Value value;
B[] bs;
alias value this;
bool opEquals(ref const B rhs) const // remove const in front of B and it
works
{
return this.bs == rhs.bs;
}
}
unittest
{
A a;
a.bs ~= B.init;
B b;
b.bs ~= B.init;
assert(b.opEquals(a)); // fails
}
This is Linux and dmd2.060.
This issue is a blocker for me because I can't use const and alias this
anymore. I have to remove the const which makes my code error-prone.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------