[Issue 9029] Built-in types treated specially for alias parameters

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9029



--- Comment #7 from Manu <turkeyman at gmail.com> 2012-11-29 10:01:54 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > 
> > > There was a proposal recently on the NG suggesting builtin types should have
> > > entries in the symbol table. Sounded fairly reasonable.
> > 
> > Yeah, this is what the dragon book suggests as well.
> 
> Huh? There is no technical difficulty whatsoever, AFAIK it was _never_ thought
> to be difficult to implement.

When did the difficulty come in to question? Something to do with this 'dragon
book' that I don't understand?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------