[Issue 10448] min and max are not NaN aware

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10448


bearophile_hugs at eml.cc changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bearophile_hugs at eml.cc


--- Comment #4 from bearophile_hugs at eml.cc 2013-06-22 13:39:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Exactly. See documentation of fmax at
> http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/fmax.3.html
> 
> Specifically:
>        If one argument is a NaN, the other argument is returned.
> 
>        If both arguments are NaN, a NaN is returned.

Isn't it better for min(0, float.nan) to be NaN, just as max(0, float.nan) ?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------