[Issue 10448] min and max are not NaN aware

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10448



--- Comment #5 from monarchdodra at gmail.com 2013-06-22 14:47:00 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Exactly. See documentation of fmax at
> > http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/fmax.3.html
> > 
> > Specifically:
> >        If one argument is a NaN, the other argument is returned.
> > 
> >        If both arguments are NaN, a NaN is returned.
> 
> Isn't it better for min(0, float.nan) to be NaN, just as max(0, float.nan) ?

Yeah, that sounds like the better behavior: *anything* and nan is always nan.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------