The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

September 2013 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sun Sep 1 01:07:06 PDT 2013
Ending: Mon Sep 30 15:26:36 PDT 2013
Messages: 1017

• [Issue 10007] function overrides but is not covariant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10007] function overrides but is not covariant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10027] demangled name format of local function is wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10098] byLine should return empty string instead of null when line is empty   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10098] byLine should return empty string instead of null when line is empty   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10099] Diagnostic for disabled default construction should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10099] Diagnostic for disabled default construction should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10099] Diagnostic for disabled default construction should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10115] More @disabled holes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10119] Add tuple overload which automatically captures the names of symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10161] std.datetime unittest failure "Libya Standard Time"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10162] Opposite of std.string.representation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10173] std.algorithm.remove should throw exception on wrong ordering of indices to remove   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10173] std.algorithm.remove should throw exception on wrong ordering of indices to remove   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10203] std.string.toUpperInPlace is... not in place   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10203] std.string.toUpperInPlace is... not in place   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10203] std.string.toUpperInPlace is... not in place   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10203] std.string.toUpperInPlace is... not in place   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10211] CTFE: Support casts from S** to D**, if S* -> D* is supported.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10211] CTFE: Support casts from S** to D**, if S* -> D* is supported.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10227] _fileno, _setmode, _O_BINARY undefined when building x64 on windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10230] Duplicated buttons for runnable examples   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10236] Ddoc: Warning on wrong parameter names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10236] Ddoc: Warning on wrong parameter names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10236] Ddoc: Warning on wrong parameter names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10246] Windows installer still downloads from ftp.digitalmars.com   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10252] CTFE: Should generate error for shifts outside valid range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10252] CTFE: Should generate error for shifts outside valid range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10277] Incorrect error file and line on redeclaration of TypeInfo   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10277] Incorrect error file and line on redeclaration of TypeInfo   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10315] Conditional triple operator unifies a char and a dchar as a uint   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10322] std.random.RandomSample.index() returns wrong value if called before front()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10322] std.random.RandomSample.index() returns wrong value if called before front()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10356] AA of structs: opAssign error.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10381] Nonsense associative array comparison   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10381] Nonsense associative array comparison   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10381] Nonsense associative array comparison   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10381] Nonsense associative array comparison   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10381] Nonsense associative array comparison   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10411] Private aliases introduce conflicts and cause bad diagnostics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10425] Link error with templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10425] Link error with templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10425] Link error with templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10441] Static libraries too big   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10441] Static libraries too big   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10441] Static libraries too big   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10441] Static libraries too big   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10451] Array of pointers to opaque struct gives forward reference errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10451] Array of pointers to opaque struct gives forward reference errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10451] Array of pointers to opaque struct gives forward reference errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10451] Array of pointers to opaque struct gives forward reference errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10451] Array of pointers to opaque struct gives forward reference errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10451] Array of pointers to opaque struct gives forward reference errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10451] Array of pointers to opaque struct gives forward reference errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10451] Array of pointers to opaque struct gives forward reference errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10451] Array of pointers to opaque struct gives forward reference errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10495] Incorrect "initializer required" error using lambdas in class with fields with disabled default construction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10495] Incorrect "initializer required" error using lambdas in class with fields with disabled default construction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10495] Incorrect "initializer required" error using lambdas in class with fields with disabled default construction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10504] Tuple error: no property 'offsetof' for type 'int'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10509] Closure is allocated even if it may be not needed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10509] Closure is allocated even if it may be not needed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10536] std.typecons.wrap doesn't work with a class that defines opCast   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10536] std.typecons.wrap doesn't work with a class that defines opCast   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10538] std.typecons.wrap should consider opDispatch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10538] std.typecons.wrap should consider opDispatch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10551] [CTFE] Wrong-code on passing dereferenced array pointer by ref 2   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10551] [CTFE] Wrong-code on passing dereferenced array pointer by ref 2   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10573] Weird linking problem with associative array cast [DMD 2.63]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10573] Weird linking problem with associative array cast [DMD 2.63]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10573] Weird linking problem with associative array cast [DMD 2.63]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10579] regression 062=>063: Cannot interpret TypeInfo at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10595] Using alias this and a hash generates wrong code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10595] Using alias this and a hash generates wrong code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10595] Using alias this and a hash generates wrong code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10608] std.typecons.RefCounted has very poor diagnostics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10608] std.typecons.RefCounted has very poor diagnostics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10608] std.typecons.RefCounted has very poor diagnostics   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10617] contract with -profile -debug is not nothrow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10617] contract with -profile -debug is not nothrow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10617] contract with -profile -debug is not nothrow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10620] ICE when using TypeInfo.getHash at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10630] Structs with disabled default construction can't be used as `out` parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10630] Structs with disabled default construction can't be used as `out` parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10630] Structs with disabled default construction can't be used as `out` parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10631] Module import pull lots of symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10631] Module import pull lots of symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10666] Regresion (2.064 git-head, 2.053+): Appender does not work with a RefCounted type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10666] Regresion (2.064 git-head, 2.053+): Appender does not work with a RefCounted type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10666] Regresion (2.064 git-head, 2.053+): Appender does not work with a RefCounted type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10682] [ICE](cgcod.c line 1561) with ^^ operator and ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10682] [ICE](cgcod.c line 1561) with ^^ operator and ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10682] [ICE](cgcod.c line 1561) with ^^ operator and ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10687] Refused cast from uint[] to array of uint-based enums at compile-time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10687] Refused cast from uint[] to array of uint-based enums at compile-time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10687] Refused cast from uint[] to array of uint-based enums at compile-time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10687] Refused cast from uint[] to array of uint-based enums at compile-time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10690] Assertion failure in swap caused by array() of a filter() of tuples of string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10695] __MODULE__ in string mixin crashes compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10717] std.ascii.toLower and toUpper should return char instead of dchar and avoid me to use a bad cast(char)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10720] ICE with is(aaOfNonCopyableStruct.nonExistingField)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10722] Regression (2.064 git-head): Cannot interpret struct at compile-time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10722] Regression (2.064 git-head): Cannot interpret struct at compile-time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10722] Regression (2.064 git-head): Cannot interpret struct at compile-time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10722] Regression (2.064 git-head): Cannot interpret struct at compile-time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10722] Regression (2.064 git-head): Cannot interpret struct at compile-time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10722] Regression (2.064 git-head): Cannot interpret struct at compile-time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10729] Some exception symbols undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10729] Some exception symbols undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10729] Some exception symbols undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10729] Some exception symbols undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10729] Some exception symbols undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10729] Some exception symbols undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10729] Some exception symbols undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10729] Some exception symbols undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10729] Some exception symbols undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10729] Some exception symbols undefined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10760] compiler drops opDispatch if it contains an error(s)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10766] Variant does not accept pointers to incomplete (opaque) types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10781] ctRegex! throws a huge error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10789] Struct destructor erroneously called   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10789] Struct destructor erroneously called   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10789] Struct destructor erroneously called   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10789] Struct destructor erroneously called   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10789] Struct destructor erroneously called   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10789] Struct destructor erroneously called   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10821] .byKey erroneously returns a null key   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10821] .byKey erroneously returns a null key   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10821] .byKey erroneously returns a null key   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10842] Some integer casts wrongly remove side-effect of the operand.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10858] CTFE wrong code for comparison of array of pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10858] CTFE wrong code for comparison of array of pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10858] CTFE wrong code for comparison of array of pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10858] CTFE wrong code for comparison of array of pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10859] Problem with array() of a map Range of simple tuples   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10864] [REG 2.064][PERFORMANCE] new Safe appender is slower than "~="   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10866] Regression (2.064 git-head) Massive compiler slowdown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10866] Regression (2.064 git-head) Massive compiler slowdown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10866] Regression (2.064 git-head) Massive compiler slowdown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10866] Regression (2.064 git-head) Massive compiler slowdown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10866] Regression (2.064 git-head) Massive compiler slowdown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10866] Regression (2.064 git-head) Massive compiler slowdown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10866] Regression (2.064 git-head) Massive compiler slowdown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10866] Regression (2.064 git-head) Massive compiler slowdown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10868] std.string.translate should take an optional buffer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10875] Introduce functionLinkageType to mirror functionLinkage with an enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10893] Numerous DDoc parameter warnings in Phobos (as found by 10236)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10893] Numerous DDoc parameter warnings in Phobos (as found by 10236)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10894] Numerous DDoc parameter warnings in druntime (as found by 10236)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10894] Numerous DDoc parameter warnings in druntime (as found by 10236)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10897] btc, btr and bts shouldn't be safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10897] btc, btr and bts shouldn't be safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10903] rebuild dlang.org documentation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10903] rebuild dlang.org documentation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10909] std.conv.to!(bool)(int): conversion from integer to bool   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10909] std.conv.to!(bool)(int): conversion from integer to bool   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10913] [2.064 git-head] regex/demange compilation failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10913] [2.064 git-head] regex/demange compilation failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10920] template instantiation order dependent link failure problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10920] template instantiation order dependent link failure problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10920] template instantiation order dependent link failure problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10920] template instantiation order dependent link failure problem   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10928] Fails to create closures that reference structs with dtor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10936] unittest in struct body makes crash dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10936] unittest in struct body makes crash dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10937] struct inside union gives uninitialized error in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10937] struct inside union gives uninitialized error in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10939] New: Inconsistent stripping of "in" but not assert in release/unittest   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10940] New: Interface post-condition breaks sub-interface covariance.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10941] New: object.d not found when following Mac installation instructions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10941] object.d not found when following Mac installation instructions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10942] New: ICE on 1087+ initializers (Internal error: backend\cgcv.c 203)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10943] New: Nested lambda alias in template arguments has no code generated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10944] [ICE](interpret.c line 310) with arith operation on missing variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10944] [ICE](interpret.c line 310) with arith operation on missing variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10944] New: [ICE](interpret.c line 310) with arith operation on missing variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10945] New: Type extracted in an 'is' expression in a constraint should be visible in the template body   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10945] Type extracted in an 'is' expression in a constraint should be visible in the template body   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10946] Integer constant expression expected instead of...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10946] Integer constant expression expected instead of...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10946] Integer constant expression expected instead of...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10946] New: Integer constant expression expected instead of...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10947] const out parameter is not properly rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10947] New: const out parameter is not properly rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10948] BitArray.opEquals is invalid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10948] New: BitArray.opEquals is invalid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10949] CTFE ICE after indexing error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10949] CTFE ICE after indexing error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10949] New: CTFE ICE after indexing error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10950] [CTFE] enum "char[]" not correctly duplicated when used.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10950] [CTFE] enum "char[]" not correctly duplicated when used.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10950] [CTFE] enum "char[]" not correctly duplicated when used.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10950] [CTFE] enum "char[]" not correctly duplicated when used.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10950] [CTFE] enum "char[]" not correctly duplicated when used.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10950] [CTFE] enum "char[]" not correctly duplicated when used.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10950] [CTFE] enum "char[]" not correctly duplicated when used.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10950] New: [CTFE] enum "char[]" not correctly duplicated when used.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10951] EnumMembers returns duplicate members for enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10951] EnumMembers returns duplicate members for enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10951] EnumMembers returns duplicate members for enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10951] EnumMembers returns duplicate members for enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10951] EnumMembers should document about returning duplicate members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10951] New: EnumMembers returns duplicate members for enums   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10952] New: struct ctor with defaulted parameters should not be allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10952] struct ctor with defaulted parameters should not be allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10952] struct ctor with defaulted parameters should not be allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10953] Attribute inheritance needs to apply to contracts, too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10953] Attribute inheritance needs to apply to contracts, too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10953] Attribute inheritance needs to apply to contracts, too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10953] New: Attribute inheritance needs to apply to contracts, too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10954] New: Include IDE integration downloads on dlang's download page   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10955] New: std.getopt errors internally when insufficient arguments are passed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10955] std.getopt errors internally when insufficient arguments are passed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10956] New: std.getopt error on wrongly position arguments should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10957] New: Bad diagnostic: compiler attempts to do UFCS on a non-function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10958] New: std.variant : Variant and Algebraic can't use a type when sizeof == 0   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10959] New: std.algorithm.remove is highly bug-prone   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10959] std.algorithm.remove is highly bug-prone   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10959] std.algorithm.remove is highly bug-prone   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10959] std.algorithm.remove is highly bug-prone   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10959] std.algorithm.remove is highly bug-prone   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10959] std.algorithm.remove is highly bug-prone   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10960] Copying a const value type should yield unqual   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10960] Copying a const value type should yield unqual   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10960] New: Copying a const value type should yield unqual   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10961] Assigning a void[] to a Variant results in compiler errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10961] New: Assigning a void[] to a Variant results in compiler errors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10962] New: Wrong implicit conversion of enum in const function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10963] New: filter.save in map changes the behavior of filter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10964] [REG][2.063] Static array assign/blit exception slips through catch block.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10964] [REG][2.063] Static array assign/blit exception slips through catch block.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10964] [REG][2.063] Static array assign/blit exception slips through catch block.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10964] [REG][2.063] Static array assign/blit exception slips through catch block.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10964] New: [REG][2.063] Static array assign/blit exception slips through catch block.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10965] Allow alias initializer as enum member to avoid counter reset   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10965] Allow alias initializer as enum member to avoid counter reset   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10965] New: Allow alias initializer as enum member to avoid counter reset   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10966] Leaked destruction in static array postblit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10966] Leaked destruction in static array postblit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10966] New: Leaked destruction in static array postblit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10967] New: static array assignement is not exception safe.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10968] array element copy (1-N and N-N) ignores postblit attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10968] array element copy (1-N and N-N) ignores postblit attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10968] array element copy (1-N and N-N) ignores postblit attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10968] array element copy (1-N and N-N) ignores postblit attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10968] New: array copy "1-to-N" by-passes "this(this) @disable"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10969] New: Variadic template parameter re-use in function signature   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10969] Variadic template parameter re-use in function signature   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] New: Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10970] Segfault in a simple test compiled without -g.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10971] assigning derived class to base should not trigger promotion of result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10971] assigning derived class to base should not trigger promotion of result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10971] assigning derived class to base should not trigger promotion of result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10971] assigning derived class to base should not trigger promotion of result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10971] assigning derived class to base should not trigger promotion of result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10971] assigning derived class to base should not trigger promotion of result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10971] assigning derived class to base should not trigger promotion of result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10971] New: assigning derived class to base should not trigger promotion of result   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10972] New: aggregate postblit doesn't clean up in case of failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10973] emplace internal error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10973] New: emplace internal error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10974] New: static or enum a=expr different from auto a=expr ;   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10974] static or enum a=expr different from auto a=expr ;   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10975] New: Assertion failed: (type->ty != Tstruct || ((TypeStruct *)type)->sym == this), function semantic, file struct.c, line 791.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10976] New: thread_joinAll after main exit performed too late   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10976] thread_joinAll after main exit performed too late   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10976] thread_joinAll after main exit performed too late   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10977] New: Segfault with __traits(hasMember, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10977] Segfault with __traits(hasMember, ...)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10978] New: Better support of emplace for structs with immutable members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10979] Add trait for function callgraph extraction, to allow "builtin attribute"-style UDA semantic checks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10979] Add trait for function callgraph extraction, to allow "builtin attribute"-style UDA semantic checks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10979] Add trait for function callgraph extraction, to allow "builtin attribute"-style UDA semantic checks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10979] New: Add trait for function callgraph extraction, to allow "builtin attribute"-style UDA semantic checks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10980] New: [reg] static initialization of immutable structs with disabled postblit fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10980] static initialization of immutable structs with disabled postblit fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10980] static initialization of immutable structs with disabled postblit fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10980] static initialization of immutable structs with disabled postblit fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10981] Contracts in pure class methods are useless   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10981] Contracts in pure class methods are useless   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10981] New: Contracts in pure class methods are useless   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10982] Misleading diagnostic for missing member function overload: "Error: inout method ... is not callable using a const object"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10982] New: Misleading diagnostic for missing member function overload: "Error: inout method ... is not callable using a const object"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10983] New: WinRT version specifier needed for the Windows Runtime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10983] WinRT version specifier needed for the Windows Runtime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10983] WinRT version specifier needed for the Windows Runtime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10983] WinRT version specifier needed for the Windows Runtime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10984] Frame access diagnostic should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10984] Frame access diagnostic should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10984] Frame access diagnostic should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10984] New: Frame access diagnostic should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10985] Compiler doesn't attempt to inline non-templated functions from libraries (even having the full source)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10985] Compiler doesn't attempt to inline non-templated functions from libraries (even having the full source)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10985] Compiler doesn't attempt to inline non-templated functions from libraries (even having the full source)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10985] Inliner doesn't attempt to inline non-templated functions from libraries (even having the full source)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10985] Inliner doesn't attempt to inline non-templated functions from libraries (even having the full source)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10985] Inliner doesn't attempt to inline non-templated functions from libraries (even having the full source)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10985] Inliner doesn't attempt to inline non-templated functions from libraries (even having the full source)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10985] New: Inliner doesn't attempt to inline non-templated functions from libraries (even having the full source)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10986] New: thread_attachThis doesn't initialize shared libraries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10986] thread_attachThis doesn't initialize shared libraries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10987] New: Add documentation for 'extern (C++)' classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10988] Add documentation on how to load DLLs at runtime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10988] New: Add documentation on how to load DLLs at runtime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10989] [CTFE] Uncaught exception messages are not pretty printed if message wasn't literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10989] [CTFE] Uncaught exception messages are not pretty printed if message wasn't literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10989] [CTFE] Uncaught exception messages are not pretty printed if message wasn't literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10989] [CTFE] Uncaught exception messages are not pretty printed if message wasn't literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10989] New: [CTFE] Uncaught exception messages are not pretty printed if message wasn't literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10990] New: Passing in a module as a mixin to __traits(getUnitTests) behaves differently than passing in the module directly.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10990] Passing in a module as a mixin to __traits(getUnitTests) behaves differently than passing in the module directly.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10990] Passing in a module as a mixin to __traits(getUnitTests) behaves differently than passing in the module directly.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10990] Passing in a module as a mixin to __traits(getUnitTests) behaves differently than passing in the module directly.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10991] Implement trait to get vptr index of a method.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10991] Implement trait to get vptr index of a method.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10991] Implement trait to get vptr index of a method.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10991] New: Implement trait to get vptr index of a method.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10992] New: Trait getUnitTests skips first test if aggregate contains multiple tests.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10992] Trait getUnitTests skips first test if aggregate contains multiple tests.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10992] Trait getUnitTests skips first test if aggregate contains multiple tests.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10992] Trait getUnitTests skips first test if aggregate contains multiple tests.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10992] Trait getUnitTests skips first test if aggregate contains multiple tests.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10992] Trait getUnitTests skips first test if aggregate contains multiple tests.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10992] Trait getUnitTests skips first test if aggregate contains multiple tests.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10992] Trait getUnitTests skips first test if aggregate contains multiple tests.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10992] Trait getUnitTests skips first test if aggregate contains multiple tests.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10992] Trait getUnitTests skips first test if aggregate contains multiple tests.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10992] Trait getUnitTests skips first test if aggregate contains multiple tests.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10992] Trait getUnitTests skips first test if aggregate contains multiple tests.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10993] mangling of voldemort types with lambdas changes during return type inference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10993] mangling of voldemort types with lambdas changes during return type inference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10993] New: mangling of voldemort types with lambdas changes during return type inference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10994] [REG] cannot declare statics struct with void-initialized static arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10994] [REG] cannot declare statics struct with void-initialized static arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10994] [REG] cannot declare statics struct with void-initialized static arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10994] New: [REG] cannot declare statics struct with void-initialized static arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10995] CTFE failures for structs with void initialized members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10995] CTFE failures for structs with void initialized members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10995] CTFE failures for structs with void initialized members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10995] CTFE failures for structs with void initialized members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10995] CTFE failures for structs with void initialized members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10995] CTFE failures for structs with void initialized members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10995] CTFE failures for structs with void initialized members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10995] CTFE failures for structs with void initialized members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10995] CTFE failures for structs with void initialized members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10995] CTFE failures for structs with void initialized members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10995] New: [REG]CTFE failures for structs with void initialized members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10996] New: Subtyping with "alias this" conflicts with private base type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10996] Subtyping with "alias this" conflicts with private base type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10996] Subtyping with "alias this" conflicts with private base type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10997] New: Tupple parsing(?)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10998] [REG 2.063] compile-time postblit call check is incorrectly suppressed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10998] [REG 2.063] compile-time postblit call check is incorrectly suppressed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10998] [REG 2.063] compile-time postblit call check is incorrectly suppressed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10998] New: [REG 2.063] compile-time postblit call check is incorrectly suppressed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10999] Limited type matching   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10999] Limited type matching   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10999] Limited type matching   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10999] Limited type matching   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10999] Limited type matching   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10999] Limited type matching   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10999] Limited type matching   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10999] Limited type matching   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10999] New: Limited type matching   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11000] New: Static field type inference failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11000] Static field type inference failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11001] Need documentation for __traits(getVirtualIndex)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11001] Need documentation for __traits(getVirtualIndex)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11001] Need documentation for __traits(getVirtualIndex)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11001] New: Need documentation for __traits(getVirtualIndex)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11002] Compiler doesn't see std.sys.linux.epoll.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11002] New: Compiler doesn't see std.sys.linux.epoll.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11003] New: Improve .di generation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11004] Need documentation for lazy evaluation of manifest constant && and ||   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11004] New: Need documentation for lazy evaluation of manifest constant && and ||   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11005] New: std.xml does not encode attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11005] std.xml does not encode attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11005] std.xml does not encode attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11006] New: Subtraction of pinters for `void` and non-void types compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11006] Subtraction of pointers for `void` and non-void types compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11007] New: std.format.formattedRead with %*s specifier causes AssertError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11008] Allow -main switch even if user-defined main function exists   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11008] Allow -main switch even if user-defined main function exists   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11008] Allow -main switch even if user-defined main function exists   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11008] Allow -main switch even if user-defined main function exists   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11008] Allow -main switch even if user-defined main function exists   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11008] New: Allow -main switch even if user-defined main function exists   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11009] New: Regression (2.064 git-head): DMD consumes huge memory when it compiles enum containing many items   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11009] Regression (2.064 git-head): DMD consumes huge memory when it compiles enum containing many items   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11009] Regression (2.064 git-head): DMD consumes huge memory when it compiles enum containing many items   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11009] Regression (2.064 git-head): DMD consumes huge memory when it compiles enum containing many items   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11009] Regression (2.064 git-head): DMD consumes huge memory when it compiles enum containing many items   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11009] Regression (2.064 git-head): DMD consumes huge memory when it compiles enum containing many items   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11009] Regression (2.064 git-head): DMD consumes huge memory when it compiles enum containing many items   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11009] Regression (2.064 git-head): DMD consumes huge memory when it compiles enum containing many items   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11009] Regression (2.064 git-head): DMD consumes huge memory when it compiles enum containing many items   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11010] New: typeid doesn't work on a member of an instance.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11010] Regression (2.063.2) typeid doesn't work on a member of an instance.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11010] Regression (2.063.2) typeid doesn't work on a member of an instance.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11010] Regression (2.063.2) typeid doesn't work on a member of an instance.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11010] Regression (2.063.2) typeid doesn't work on a member of an instance.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11010] Regression (2.063.2) typeid doesn't work on a member of an instance.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11010] Regression (2.063.2) typeid doesn't work on a member of an instance.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11010] Regression (2.063.2) typeid doesn't work on a member of an instance.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11011] New: struct core.time.Duration member this is not accessible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11011] struct core.time.Duration member this is not accessible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11012] [TDPL] is(typeof(f) == function) fails with some functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11012] New: [TDPL] is(typeof(f) == function) fails with some functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11013] ignoring variable inside the predicate of findSplitBefore   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11013] New: ignoring variable inside the predicate of findSplitBefore   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11014] New: call stack not displayed when exception is thrown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11015] New: BitArray.opCom is invalid on 64 bit machines   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11016] New: "Improve this page" links broken for druntime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11017] New: std.string/uni.toLower is very slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11017] std.string/uni.toLower is very slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11017] std.string/uni.toLower is very slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11017] std.string/uni.toLower is very slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11017] std.string/uni.toLower is very slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11017] std.string/uni.toLower is very slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11017] std.string/uni.toLower is very slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11018] New: Warn for wrong for nested loops   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11019] New: fwd reference : legal in C++, CT error in D (unable to resolve forward reference in definition)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11020] Add function for getting the current executable path   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11020] New: Add function for getting the current executable path   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11021] New: Huge GC leak leads to crash; GC uses 7x more memory   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11022] Assert failure struct.c:741   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11022] Assert failure struct.c:741   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11022] Assert failure struct.c:741   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11022] Assert failure struct.c:741   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11022] Assert failure struct.c:741   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11022] Assert failure struct.c:741   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11022] New: Assert failure struct.c:741   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11023] DMD crashes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11023] DMD crashes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11023] New: DMD crashes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11024] New: cannot inspect global variables in debugger   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11025] New: std.typecons.Tuple needs to define toHash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11026] New: cannot step in debugger after exception   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11027] New: Visual D and perforce do not go along   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11028] New: Step over repeats lines while debugging   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11029] New: templates, nested structs do not debug properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11030] New: Templated functions seem to be skipped by breakpoints   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11031] New: Simple member function being skipped over   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11032] New: Win64 lib paths seem to be messed up   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11033] New: Visual-D seems to catch exceptions, which breaks the flow of code while debugging   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11034] New: ICE: Assertion failed: (!scope), function toObjFile, file toobj.c, line 366.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11035] Bad solution dependencies to C++ projects   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11035] Bad solution dependencies to C++ projects   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11035] New: Bad solution dependencies to C++ projects   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11036] Document that .stringof should not be used for code generation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11036] Document that .stringof should not be used for code generation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11036] Document that .stringof should not be used for code generation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11036] Document that .stringof should not be used for code generation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11036] Document that .stringof should not be used for code generation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11036] New: Document that .stringof should not be used for code generation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11037] AA's totally broken for struct keys with indirection   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11037] New: AA's totally broken for struct keys with indirection   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11038] New: static has no effect as a block attribute for imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11039] New: Undefined instantiation from circular imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11039] Undefined instantiation from circular imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11039] Undefined instantiation from circular imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11039] Undefined instantiation from circular imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11040] New: Exception from writeln function if the input size is big   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11041] New: Some function in core.stdc should be CTFEable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11041] Some function in core.stdc should be CTFEable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11041] Some function in core.stdc should be CTFEable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11042] Inconsistent "static condition" behaviors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11042] Inconsistent "static condition" behaviors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11042] Inconsistent "static condition" behaviors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11042] New: Inconsistent "static condition" behaviors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11043] New: Context pointer of delegate should be const qualified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11044] New: Escaping references to lazy argument are allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11045] New: Pure functions are allowed to read/write global TypeInfo   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11046] [enh] Pure functions with default and out parameters are allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11046] [enh] Pure functions with default and out parameters are allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11046] [enh] Pure functions with default and out parameters are allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11046] [enh] Pure functions with default and out parameters are allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11046] [enh] Pure functions with default and out parameters are allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11046] [enh] Pure functions with default and out parameters are allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11046] New: [enh] Pure functions with default and out parameters are allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11046] Pure functions with default and out parameters are allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11046] Pure functions with default and out parameters are allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11047] New: UDA + getAttributes bypass purity/safety check   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11048] Default arguments not taken into account when being called by pure functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11048] Default arguments not taken into account when being called by pure functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11048] New: Default arguments not taken into account when being called by pure functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11049] New: RangeError does not recognize file name modified by #line directive   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11049] RangeError does not recognize file name modified by #line directive   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11050] New: DDoc should provide file and line information   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11051] New: Unmatched case in a final switch should throw in both release and non-release mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11051] Unmatched case in a final switch should throw in both release and non-release mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11051] Unmatched case in a final switch should throw in both release and non-release mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11051] Unmatched case in a final switch should throw in both release and non-release mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11051] Unmatched case in a final switch should throw in both release and non-release mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11051] Unmatched case in a final switch should throw in both release and non-release mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11051] Unmatched case in a final switch should throw in both release and non-release mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11052] New: pathSplitter cannot be converted to string[], and to!() template fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11053] New: Regression (2.064 git-head): Recursive template expansion error with -unittest switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11053] Recursive template expansion error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11053] Regression (2.064 git-head): Recursive template expansion error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11053] Regression (2.064 git-head): Recursive template expansion error with -unittest switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11053] Regression (2.064 git-head): Recursive template expansion error with -unittest switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11053] Regression (2.064 git-head): Recursive template expansion error with -unittest switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11053] Regression (2.064 git-head): Recursive template expansion error with -unittest switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11053] Regression (2.064 git-head): Recursive template expansion error with -unittest switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11053] Regression (2.064 git-head): Recursive template expansion error with -unittest switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11053] Regression (2.064 git-head): Recursive template expansion error with -unittest switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE: interpret.c:357: virtual void Statement::ctfeCompile(CompiledCtfeFunction*): Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE: interpret.c:357: virtual void Statement::ctfeCompile(CompiledCtfeFunction*): Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE: interpret.c:357: virtual void Statement::ctfeCompile(CompiledCtfeFunction*): Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] ICE: interpret.c:357: virtual void Statement::ctfeCompile(CompiledCtfeFunction*): Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11054] New: ICE with -property when importing std.traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11055] New: Regression (2.064 git-head): 'pure' function prevents its in-contract from checking parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11055] Regression (2.064 git-head): 'pure' function prevents its in-contract from checking parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11056] New: synchronized methods are marked shared in ddoc output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11057] [REG2.064dev] New std.uni has icmp() partly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11057] [REG2.064dev] New std.uni has icmp() partly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11057] [REG2.064dev] New std.uni has icmp() partly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11057] New: [REG2.064dev] New std.uni has icmp() partly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11058] New: deprecated message doesn't work with selective imports   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11059] New: alias to symbol in different conditional compilation scope depends on lexical order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11060] delete gives InvalidMemoryOperationError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11060] delete gives InvalidMemoryOperationError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11060] delete gives InvalidMemoryOperationError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11060] New: delete gives InvalidMemoryOperationError   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11061] New: std.variant.Variant equality comparison always returns false for static array literals.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11062] inline ice with alias this and opIndexAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11062] inline ice with alias this and opIndexAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11062] inline ice with alias this and opIndexAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11062] New: inline ice with alias this and opIndexAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11063] __MODULE__ in mixin crash dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11063] __MODULE__ in mixin crash dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11063] __MODULE__ in mixin crash dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11063] __MODULE__ in mixin crash dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11063] __MODULE__ in mixin crash dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11063] New: __MODULE__ in mixin crash dmd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11064] New: D should support block statements inside functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11065] New: Package-scoped import introduces symbol conflicts   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11065] Package-scoped import introduces symbol conflicts   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11065] Package-scoped import introduces symbol conflicts   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11065] Package-scoped import introduces symbol conflicts   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11066] New: Spurious warning when profiling codes using toLower()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11066] Spurious warning when profiling codes using toLower()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11067] New: dmd segfaults on nested template instantiation (eg A!(A!(int)) )   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11068] New: raw formatting of chars and strings is wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11068] raw formatting of chars and strings is wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11068] raw formatting of chars and strings is wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11068] raw formatting of chars and strings is wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11069] DMD (github HEAD) Linker Regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11069] DMD (github HEAD) Linker Regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11069] DMD (github HEAD) Linker Regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11069] DMD (github HEAD) Linker Regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11069] DMD (github HEAD) Linker Regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11069] New: DMD (github HEAD) Linker Regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11070] Allow auto statement in a switch statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11070] Allow auto statement in a switch statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11070] Allow auto statement in a switch statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11070] Allow declaration statement in a switch expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11070] Allow declaration statement in a switch expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11070] New: Allow auto statement in a switch statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11071] New: REX.R and REX.W prefixes do not seem to be generated in some cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11071] REX.R and REX.W prefixes do not seem to be generated in some cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11071] REX.R and REX.W prefixes do not seem to be generated in some cases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11072] New: BitArray.opCmp is invalid on 64x   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11073] Move semantics not respected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11073] New: Move semantics not respected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11074] New: Template value parameter defaults behave differently for IFTI and normal instantations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11075] ICE(struct.c) after gagged error in struct field initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11075] New: ICE(struct.c) after gagged error in struct field initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11076] Allow delete null in the spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11076] Allow delete null in the spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11076] New: Allow delete null in the spec   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11077] New: iota() should be statically specialized for increment 1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11078] Diagnostic for wrong RHS in property assign of a property group should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11078] New: Diagnostic for wrong RHS in property assign of a property group should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11079] Attributes for template functions should be visible when used with traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11079] New: Attributes for template functions should be visible when used with traits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11080] New: assert(`string`) should be forbidden   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11081] New: Win64: duplicate COMDAT with failed compilation with lambdas   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11081] Win64: duplicate COMDAT with failed compilation with lambdas   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11081] Win64: duplicate COMDAT with failed compilation with lambdas   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11081] Win64: duplicate COMDAT with failed compilation with lambdas   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11081] Win64: duplicate COMDAT with failed compilation with lambdas   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11082] New: std.algorithm.join of a dynamic array of fixed-size arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11082] std.algorithm.join of a dynamic array of fixed-size arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11082] std.algorithm.join of a dynamic array of fixed-size arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11082] std.algorithm.join of a dynamic array of fixed-size arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11082] std.algorithm.join of a dynamic array of fixed-size arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11082] std.algorithm.join of a dynamic array of fixed-size arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11082] std.algorithm.join of a dynamic array of fixed-size arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11082] std.algorithm.join of a dynamic array of fixed-size arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11083] New: Whole global matrix initialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11083] Whole global matrix initialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11084] New: std.algorithm.scan   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11084] std.algorithm.scan   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11084] std.algorithm.scan   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11085] New: Refused power vector operation of composed expression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11086] dmd segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11086] dmd segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11086] dmd segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11086] dmd segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11086] dmd segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11086] New: dmd segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11087] New: std.file.File.write implicitly converts Unix newlines to Windows newlines   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11087] std.stdio.File.write implicitly converts Unix newlines to Windows newlines   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11087] std.stdio.File.write implicitly converts Unix newlines to Windows newlines   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11087] std.stdio.File.write implicitly converts Unix newlines to Windows newlines   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11088] Diagnostics for enum member overflows should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11088] Diagnostics for enum member overflows should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11088] Diagnostics for enum member overflows should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11088] Diagnostics for enum member overflows should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11088] New: Diagnostics for enum member overflows should improve   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11089] New: std.string.toUpper doesn't work with 1:m mappings   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11089] std.string.toUpper doesn't work with 1:m mappings   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11089] std.string.toUpper doesn't work with 1:m mappings   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11090] New: Template recursion causes Segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11091] Deduced purity doesn't work?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11091] New: Deduced purity doesn't work?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11092] @commutative annotation for commutative functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11092] New: @commutative annotation for commutative functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11093] Can't compile DMD with VS12   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11093] Can't compile DMD with VS12   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11093] New: Can't compile DMD with VS12   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11094] New: Disuniform error messages with overloaded + and ^ operators   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11095] New: mixed in mixin templates not instantiated in templates?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11096] mixin templates are not regular templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11096] New: mixin templates are not regular templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11097] Add version of std.algorithm.group that returns group ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11097] Add version of std.algorithm.group that returns group ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11097] New: Add version of std.algorithm.group that returns group ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11098] New: template instance x cannot use local y as parameter to non-global template z   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11099] New: Diagnostic for mixed-in symbols should not reference the mixin template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11100] (T!int).stringof changes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11100] (T!int).stringof changes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11100] New: (T!int).stringof changes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11101] Invalid enum member overflow message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11101] Invalid enum member overflow message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11101] Invalid enum member overflow message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11101] Invalid enum member overflow message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11101] New: Invalid enum member overflow message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11102] New: [ddoc] stray ( / ) without line or column numbers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11103] New: w and d suffix for char literals too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11104] Document exact behavior of structsasd initialization inside AA   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11104] New: Document exact behavior of structsasd initialization inside AA   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11105] Error on struct with multidimentional static array initialization from its element   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11105] New: Error on struct with multidimentional static array initialization from its element   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11106] New: Chaos on struct with multidimentional static array initialization from its element   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11107] New: variable initialized to mutable non-TLS global.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11108] `hasElaborateAssign` should check whether the type is assignable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11108] New: `hasElaborateAssign` should check whether the type is assignable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11109] New: shared opAssign not colled if there is no unshared one   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11110] New: Variant.convertsTo doesn't work like isImplicitlyConvertible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11111] New: std.algorithm.canFind fails to find in range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11111] std.algorithm.canFind fails to find in range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11111] std.algorithm.canFind fails to find in range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11111] std.algorithm.canFind should support Needles...   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11112] New: Unable to execute shell commands in different threads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11112] Unable to execute shell commands in different threads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11113] New: Weird constructor syntax failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11113] Weird constructor syntax failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11113] Weird constructor syntax failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11114] New: Undefined symbols after merging dmd pull #2550   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11114] Undefined symbols after merging dmd pull #2550   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11114] Undefined symbols after merging dmd pull #2550   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11114] Undefined symbols after merging dmd pull #2550   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11114] Undefined symbols after merging dmd pull #2550   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11114] Undefined symbols after merging dmd pull #2550   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11114] Undefined symbols after merging dmd pull #2550   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11114] Undefined symbols after merging dmd pull #2550   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11114] Undefined symbols after merging dmd pull #2550   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11115] New: VisualD rebuilds project even if nothing changed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11115] VisualD rebuilds project even if nothing changed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11115] VisualD rebuilds project even if nothing changed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11115] VisualD rebuilds project even if nothing changed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11115] VisualD rebuilds project even if nothing changed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11115] VisualD rebuilds project even if nothing changed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11115] VisualD rebuilds project even if nothing changed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11116] core.sys.windows.windows does not expose GetDesktopWindow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11116] core.sys.windows.windows does not expose GetDesktopWindow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11116] New: core.sys.windows.windows does not expose GetDesktopWindow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11117] New: Pseudo module __entrypoint.d listed as dependency with -deps   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11117] Pseudo module __entrypoint.d listed as dependency with -deps   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11117] Pseudo module __entrypoint.d listed as dependency with -deps   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11117] Pseudo module __entrypoint.d listed as dependency with -deps   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11118] New: undefined identifier in template structs functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11119] New: Alias declaration cannot see forward-referenced symbol in mixed-in template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11120] New: Compiler calls wrong property when using type tuple of length 1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11121] New: Wrong parenthesis omission in ddoc output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11121] Wrong parenthesis omission in ddoc output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11121] Wrong parenthesis omission in ddoc output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11121] Wrong parenthesis omission in ddoc output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11122] COM server uses too much CPU   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11122] New: COM server uses too much CPU   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11123] New: std.getopt should support functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11123] std.getopt should support functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11123] std.getopt should support functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11123] std.getopt should support functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11124] New: support "is (T : struct)" syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11124] support "is (T : struct)" syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11124] support "is (T : struct)" syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11124] support "is (T : struct)" syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11124] support "is (T : struct)" syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11124] support "is (T : struct)" syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11124] support "is (T : struct)" syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11124] support "is (T : struct)" syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11125] New: UFCS instantiation of template causes template constraint to be skipped   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11125] UFCS instantiation of template causes template constraint to be skipped   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11125] UFCS instantiation of template causes template constraint to be skipped   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11125] UFCS instantiation of template causes template constraint to be skipped   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11125] UFCS instantiation of template causes template constraint to be skipped   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11126] New: Link failure when using instancing anonymous classes to a static variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11127] New: std.range.cycle linker errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11127] std.range.cycle linker errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11127] std.range.cycle linker errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11127] std.range.cycle linker errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11128] New: std.algorithm.reduce one-argument version cannot always be chained using UFCS   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11128] std.algorithm.reduce one-argument version cannot always be chained using UFCS   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11129] multiSort doesn't work with std.container.Array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11129] New: multiSort doesn't work with std.container.Array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11130] Enum members are now all in scope when evaluating enum member initializers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11130] Enum members are now all in scope when evaluating enum member initializers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11130] New: Regression (2.064 git-head): Enum members hijack module-scoped symbols in initializers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11130] Regression (2.064 git-head): Enum members hijack module-scoped symbols in initializers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11131] New: variables without linkage shouldn't have a mangling (.mangleof)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11132] New: Odd diagnostic with C-style struct initializer when union field is present   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11132] Odd diagnostic with C-style struct initializer when union field is present   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11133] ddoc: documented unittest outside of version scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11133] New: ddoc: documented unittest outside of version scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11134] Inconsistent postblit call count depends on the pointer size   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11134] New: Inconsistent postblit call count depends on the pointer size   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11135] New: Nullable(T, T nullValue) does not support NaN   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11136] ICE on incorrect module declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11136] New: ICE on incorrect module declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11137] New: Stack overflow on invalid output path   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11138] "real" appender missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11138] "real" appender missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11138] "real" appender missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11138] New: "real" appender missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11139] malloc/emplace resulting in memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11139] New: malloc/emplace resulting in memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11140] Destructor/postblit bug for struct members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11140] Destructor/postblit bug for struct members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11140] New: Destructor/postblit bug for struct members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11141] Missing .pdb file with phobos64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11141] New: Missing .pdb file with phobos64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11142] New: Wrong error message "no size yet for forward reference" for opaque struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11142] Wrong error message "no size yet for forward reference" for opaque struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11142] Wrong error message "no size yet for forward reference" for opaque struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11142] Wrong error message "no size yet for forward reference" for opaque struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11143] Error highlighting incorrect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11143] Error highlighting incorrect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11143] New: Error highlighting incorrect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11144] Better diagnostic for typeid symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11144] Better diagnostic for typeid symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11144] Better diagnostic for typeid symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11144] New: Better diagnostic for typeid symbol   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11145] Duplicated deprecation message "use of typedef is deprecated; "   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11145] Duplicated deprecation message "use of typedef is deprecated; "   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11145] Duplicated deprecation message "use of typedef is deprecated; "   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11145] New: Duplicated deprecation message "use of typedef is deprecated; "   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11146] New: Wrong line number of "identity assignment operator overload is illegal"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11146] Wrong line number of "identity assignment operator overload is illegal"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11146] Wrong line number of "identity assignment operator overload is illegal"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11146] Wrong line number of "identity assignment operator overload is illegal"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11147] Nested structs in a union are not correctly initialized   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11147] Nested structs in a union are not correctly initialized   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11147] Nested structs in a union are not correctly initialized   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11147] Nested structs in a union are not correctly initialized   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11147] Nested structs in a union are not correctly initialized   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11147] New: Nested structs in a union are not correctly initialized   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11148] Can't implicitly convert const(BigInt) or immutable(BigInt) to BigInt   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11148] New: Can't implicitly convert const(BigInt) or immutable(BigInt) to BigInt   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11149] New: Runtime.args no longer available in static constructors.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11150] New: Allow aliasing of an aggregate template instance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1238] Private identifiers in imported modules create conflicts with public ones   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1878] foreach does not handle integral types appropriately   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1878] foreach does not handle integral types appropriately   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1878] foreach does not handle integral types appropriately   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 259] Comparing signed to unsigned does not generate an error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 259] Comparing signed to unsigned does not generate an error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 317] Need full translation of the Windows API headers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3438] struct ctor with defaulted parameters should be rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3643] Compiler error on obtaining typeid of a property   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3956] linker removes underscore from all exported symbols of a module but the first   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3956] linker removes underscore from all exported symbols of a module but the first   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3956] linker removes underscore from all exported symbols of a module but the first   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3956] linker removes underscore from all exported symbols of a module but the first   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3956] linker removes underscore from all exported symbols of a module but the first   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4092] broken memory management for COM objects derived from IUnknown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4092] broken memory management for COM objects derived from IUnknown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4092] broken memory management for COM objects derived from IUnknown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4092] broken memory management for COM objects derived from IUnknown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4092] broken memory management for COM objects derived from IUnknown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4092] broken memory management for COM objects derived from IUnknown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4092] broken memory management for COM objects derived from IUnknown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4092] broken memory management for COM objects derived from IUnknown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4092] broken memory management for COM objects derived from IUnknown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4092] broken memory management for COM objects derived from IUnknown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4301] BigInt * const(BigInt) doesn't work well   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4419] __gshared static in class has no effect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4419] __gshared static in class has no effect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4419] __gshared static in class has no effect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4419] __gshared static in class has no effect   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4421] Union propagates copy constructors and destructors over all members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4527] writeln/typeid to use string type names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4576] [tdpl] 0/1 argument calls to overloaded function is allowed in presence of variadic function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4595] [tdpl] Accessing non-static member of a null reference compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4595] [tdpl] Accessing non-static member of a null reference compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4595] [tdpl] Accessing non-static member of a null reference compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4636] scoped + private constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4636] scoped + private constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4636] scoped + private constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4673] Bug in std.string (isNumeric)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4705] Redesign of std.algorithm.max()/min() + mins()/maxs()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4733] Possible bugs caused by dynamic arrays in boolean evaluation context   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4734] immutable return type specifier without parantheses confuses the compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4741] typeid() does not return correct type qualifiers for fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5060] Order of interface implementations affects code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5060] Order of interface implementations affects code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5234] [qtd] AA element assignment should use copy-constructor to initialize new elements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5316] std.getopt with associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5316] std.getopt with associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5460] enum of struct not calling constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5542] std.string.join() for chars too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5570] 64 bit C ABI not followed for passing structs and complex numbers as function parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5570] 64 bit C ABI not followed for passing structs and complex numbers as function parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5570] 64 bit C ABI not followed for passing structs and complex numbers as function parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5822] Segfault when adding File to an Associative array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5968] std.algorithm.group by key function + groupFull   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6039] C-style initialization of structs doesn't take field initializers into account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6045] Unable to demangle symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6045] Unable to demangle symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6045] Unable to demangle symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6081] Function Literal Templates Don't Work when Nested in Templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6178] Struct inside the AA are not init correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6186] Struct destructor is not called on out parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6269] aliasing in IsExpression doesn't work when used inside a template constraint   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6269] aliasing in IsExpression doesn't work when used inside a template constraint   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6310] Missing "template instantiation" traceback when an error happens in the template parameter of an alias.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6469] Compiler fails to initialize associative array: string->[string->string]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6646] [SafeD] array.reserve is not @safe/trusted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6646] [SafeD] array.reserve is not @safe/trusted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6718] "nWayUnion" => "nWayMerge", plus true nWayUnion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6829] Unsigned rotate standard function in Phobos   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6843] Function to check whether std.conv.to will succeed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6906] Cannot assign value into associative array if contains opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6932] Weird forward reference error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6989] Implement toString for std.concurrency.Tid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7014] Better union initialization syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7057] Compiler errors on different functions on argument mismatch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7191] ctor/opAssign doesn't play nice with field initialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7191] ctor/opAssign doesn't play nice with field initialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7191] ctor/opAssign doesn't play nice with field initialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7260] "g" on default in std.regex   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7270] Wrong writeln(typeid(T)) with const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7270] Wrong writeln(typeid(T)) with const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7283] Add error info to failed shell call   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7503] ICE(cgcs.c) "File[string]" associative array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7690] std.string.join of const string array too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7727] Allso "static initializer" for non-static unions too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7746] Error with 'TOK232' declaring enum of anonymous nested class type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7799] Can't use alias for overload resolution with alias this subtype   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7799] Can't use alias for overload resolution with alias this subtype   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7799] Can't use alias for overload resolution with alias this subtype   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7892] Compiler-generated struct copies can result in errors when ctor is @disable'd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7892] Compiler-generated struct copies can result in errors when ctor is @disable'd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7892] Compiler-generated struct copies can result in errors when ctor is @disable'd   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8018] Template fails to instantiate with templated argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8082] Invalid error messages based on module compilation order   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8097] opDispatch produces confusing error message when rejected by a template constraint   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8170] Incorrect member initialization in associative array of structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8229] string literals are not zero-terminated during CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8229] string literals are not zero-terminated during CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8318] Cannot override a method with inferred return type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8413] function breaks compilation of property function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8415] Forward reference error with static nested classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8439] typeid fail to resolve symbol properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8451] cv2pdb does not work properly with 2.060-produced binaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8612] ICE(struct.c) struct alignment failure for delegate in catch block referring to the catched exception   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8732] std.typecons: BlackHole/WhiteHole always declare methods public   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8738] Struct literal breaks assigment ordering   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8746] rehash AA property doesn't work with constant Tuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8755] Change the order of reduce arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8825] Wrong line number of error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8851] std.string.join should allow 'char' as joiner   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8851] std.string.join should allow 'char' as joiner   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8851] std.string.join should allow 'char' as joiner   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8851] std.string.join should allow 'char' as joiner   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8851] std.string.join should allow 'char' as joiner   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8931] array/slice assignment causes destruction + postblit instead of opAssign   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9040] Assertion `precedence[e->op] != PREC_zero' failed instantiating anonymous class at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9040] Assertion `precedence[e->op] != PREC_zero' failed instantiating anonymous class at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9040] Assertion `precedence[e->op] != PREC_zero' failed instantiating anonymous class at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9040] Assertion `precedence[e->op] != PREC_zero' failed instantiating anonymous class at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9040] Assertion `precedence[e->op] != PREC_zero' failed instantiating anonymous class at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9041] "Need 'this' to access member" of inner class in typeid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9073] In manifest constant initializer, && and || should evaluate their operands lazily.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9073] In manifest constant initializer, && and || should evaluate their operands lazily.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9073] In manifest constant initializer, && and || should evaluate their operands lazily.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9073] In manifest constant initializer, && and || should evaluate their operands lazily.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9121] Templated getters/setter for properties collision   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9197] Assigning structs with postblit to a member of another struct fails at CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9207] std.array.join of immutable(string[])   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9297] Formatting of floating point values in std.format truncates reals to double   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9303] ICE(glue.c) template mixin with property switch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9310] escapeShellCommand unittests are never run   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9364] [ICE] Error: CTFE internal error painting S*   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9364] [ICE] Error: CTFE internal error painting S*   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9371] @safe works or doesn't depending on the position   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9384] std.socket: UnixAddress broken on Linux and others   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9396] Wrong line number when assigning nested enum to struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9401] destructor and nothrow syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9547] typeof() which requires .init must be properly documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9565] Index of static array should not print literal suffix   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9571] link error due to using unique ids in anonymous funcliteral   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9571] link error due to using unique ids in anonymous funcliteral   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9571] link error due to using unique ids in anonymous funcliteral   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9571] link error due to using unique ids in anonymous funcliteral   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9571] link error due to using unique ids in anonymous funcliteral   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9571] link error due to using unique ids in anonymous funcliteral   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9629] toUpperInPlace doesn't work properly with unicode characters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9699] strip functions should have stripLeft/stripRight counterparts and be generic   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9699] strip functions should have stripLeft/stripRight counterparts and be generic   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9708] inout breaks zero parameter IFTI   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9776] Make raw write mode the default   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9776] Make raw write mode the default   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9809] Need a better diagnostic on accessing 'alias this' to private symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9816] Export is mostly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9825] Add ability to auto-generate a specific field constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9875] opDispatch is wrongly set to safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9948] -deps dependency printing incorrect for templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9948] -deps dependency printing incorrect for templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9948] -deps dependency printing incorrect for templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9948] -deps dependency printing incorrect for templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9982] ICE on CTFE for pointer dereference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9982] ICE on CTFE for pointer dereference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com

Last message date: Mon Sep 30 15:26:36 PDT 2013
Archived on: Mon Sep 30 15:30:03 PDT 2013

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...