The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

June 2020 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Jun 1 05:47:00 UTC 2020
Ending: Tue Jun 30 22:57:00 UTC 2020
Messages: 523

• [Issue 10560] Enum typed as int with value equal to 0 or 1 prefer bool over int overload   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10572] Test suite for std.random   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11064] D should support block statements inside functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11202] Copy constructor is called instead of assignment on member   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11405] rdmd should limit its tmp cache   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11827] rdmd makes too many stat() calls, of which many are not traced   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 11864] std.variant.Variant doesn't work with CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12724] return early from a contract using return   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12832] asm movdqu accepts wrong operand size   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13167] Link errors with std.variant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13189] `alias this` is not transitive   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13345] rdmd --eval doesn't support args   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13345] rdmd --eval doesn't support args   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13346] rdmd --option value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13347] rdmd: let args[0] be the .d file   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13667] ICE with inout and alias this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13733] DMD produce object file that cause gold to crash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13804] BigInt have no binary interface to be used in crypto   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14120] iasm is missing pause instruction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14128] AliasDeclaration allows expressions, causing false code for ThisExp   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14129] stdio.write crashed on window console with codepage 65001   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14294] partialSort should also accept two ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14654] rdmd should compile package at a time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14659] static if not working with associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14690] pragma(inline, true) functions must have their bodies emitted in the .di file   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14690] pragma(inline, true) functions must have their bodies emitted in the .di file   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15110] pragma(inline) rarely works how I want it to   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15110] pragma(inline) rarely works how I want it to   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15246] Destructor inheritance doesn't inherit attributes properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15246] Destructor inheritance doesn't inherit attributes properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15467] Compiler incorrectly flags a function as throwing an exception though it is caught   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15489] regex - `(..).*\1` doesn't match "axxxx"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15590] 0 coverage should be ignored in __ctfe branches   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15631] gdb: Parent's scope not considered for symbol lookup   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15631] gdb: Parent's scope not considered for symbol lookup   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15631] gdb: Parent's scope not considered for symbol lookup   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15634] new __traits request: isLvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15634] new __traits request: isLvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15671] The compiler should take into account inline pragmas when inlining   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15671] The compiler should take into account inline pragmas when inlining   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15671] The compiler should take into account inline pragmas when inlining   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15671] The compiler should take into account inline pragmas when inlining   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15671] The compiler should take into account inline pragmas when inlining   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15671] The compiler should take into account inline pragmas when inlining   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15685] &slice[$] should be allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15724] CTFE internal error: determining classinfo   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16214] [REG2.069] ICE: Assertion `fd->semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16302] Add opStaticIndex that takes compile-time indices   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16431] rdmd runs dmd twice for single-files with no dependencies   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16528] @safe inference does not work for mutually recursive functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16562] Icon for D files   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16796] Linker error on big file + -gc switch generated by jtransc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16946] rdmd causes linker issues when DMD options are changed between runs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16953] auto-tester doesn't run rdmd_test (causes a number of regressions in each release)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17007] let std.math work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1701] rcc fails on ico with Vista 256x256 icon   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17044] Bugzilla integration fails with reverts and multiple branches   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17069] rdmd code should be split in reusable libraries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17071] `rdmd -deps=foo.deps foo.d` caching misses dependency on foo.deps   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17216] OSX: `rdmd -shared -oflibfun.dylib fun.d` and otool -L libfun.dylib points to libfun.dylib.tmp   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17236] DMD doesn't build on debian anymore   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17379] Mangle voldemort types as if they are defined in the outer scope to avoid exponential symbol name length with templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17379] Mangle voldemort types as if they are defined in the outer scope to avoid exponential symbol name length with templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17508] optlink 8.00.17 crash at EIP=0040F60A   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17569] Rename dman in the Debian .deb package to prevent conflict with Debian package debian-goodies   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17712] [REG 2.074] [LINK] Undefined reference to std.conv.toChars!(10, char, 1, uint).toChars(uint)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17712] [REG 2.074] [LINK] Undefined reference to std.conv.toChars!(10, char, 1, uint).toChars(uint)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17712] [REG 2.074] [LINK] Undefined reference to std.conv.toChars!(10, char, 1, uint).toChars(uint)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17712] [REG 2.074] [LINK] Undefined reference to std.conv.toChars!(10, char, 1, uint).toChars(uint)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17765] void initialisation of out parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17765] void initialisation of out parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17838] rdmd file-descriptor issues with snap packages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17911] Add { } block attributes for local variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17987] Cannot use string in Variant at compile time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18103] test17868 failing often but not every time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18103] test17868 failing often but not every time   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18119] Allow code that may allocated inside __ctfe condition branches in @nogc functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18122] Link to the PR that introduced a new feature   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18235] Group logically similar tests into the same module in the D2 testsuite   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18269] Inconsistent string representation of delegate @system attribute   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18413] Document how to setup/run DMD test suite on WINDOWS   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18658] Provide GNUmake for easier development setup   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18658] Provide GNUmake for easier development setup   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18734] bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18734] bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18734] bitnum parameter of core.bitop.bt should be signed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18748] bt instruction with immediate offset uses 64-bit variant for 32-bit data   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18749] bt instruction using 64-bit register for 32-bit offset   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18749] bt instruction using 64-bit register for 32-bit offset   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18750] [Tracker] everything wrong with code generation for bt instruction   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18831] Weird interaction between std.variant, std.algorithm.iteration.map, and alias this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18961] Need give to compiler/linker' warning/errors some codes (like VC)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19044] Linking error: reloc 0: symbol index out of range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19089] Compiler crash for using struct &this   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19399] Different Conversion Rules for Same Value and Type -- Enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19399] Different Conversion Rules for Same Value and Type -- Enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19399] Different Conversion Rules for Same Value and Type -- Enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19399] Different Conversion Rules for Same Value and Type -- Enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19399] Different Conversion Rules for Same Value and Type -- Enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19399] Different Conversion Rules for Same Value and Type -- Enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19470] No example for __traits(isStaticFunction)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19476] explicit mixin template function call results in recursive call instead   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19548] [REG 2.080] Missing reference to _D6object__T14__switch_errorZQrFNaNbNiNfAyamZv   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19570] pragma(inline) is emitting symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19570] pragma(inline) is emitting symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19570] pragma(inline) is emitting symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19570] pragma(inline) is emitting symbols   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19705] Static foreach slow for numeric ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19705] Static foreach slow for numeric ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19705] Static foreach slow for numeric ranges   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19801] Linking error: ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19968] @safe code can create invalid bools resulting in memory corruption   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20014] [REG 2.084] -transition=all, -preview=all, -revert=all is invalid   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20023] Separate compilation breaks dip1000 / dip1008 @safety   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20093] __traits(getAttributes) Error: cannot form tuple of tuples   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20148] void initializated bool can be both true and false   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20148] void initializated bool can be both true and false   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20148] void initializated bool can be both true and false   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20170] [dip1000] scope and return not inferred for auto ref parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20183] Assigning statement scope of struct literal or temporary to variable with longer lifetime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20195] -preview=nosharedaccess has some access problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20195] -preview=nosharedaccess has some access problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20195] -preview=nosharedaccess has some access problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20195] -preview=nosharedaccess has some access problems   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20197] Make std.math.isIdentical work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20197] Make std.math.isIdentical work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20197] Make std.math.isIdentical work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20233] opDispatch hides alias this properties   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20257] Implement waitTimeout() in std.process   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20273] inline asm - add `pause` opcode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20278] ICE: calling std.math.sqrt with int cast to double   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20296] Segfault when using variadic D functions with extern(C++) linkage   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20363] painting XMM registers and integers leads to codegen bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20363] painting XMM registers as integers leads to codegen bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20363] painting XMM registers as integers leads to codegen bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20377] extern(C) void main(string[] args) has invalid 'args'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20377] extern(C) void main(string[] args) has invalid 'args'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20378] Main function specification is incomplete   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20390] Add llvm-dlltool.exe to dmd windows release?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20407] Windows installer doesn't detect VS2019   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20410] ReplaceTypeUnless replaces enums with their basetype   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20410] ReplaceTypeUnless replaces enums with their basetype   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20424] A constructor with a value argument of the same type as being constructed should be an error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20445] [tools] remove build date for a reproducible build   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20469] include dstep in the official distribution   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20471] DMD Crash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20471] TypeInfo_Array incorrectly initialized   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20471] TypeInfo_Array incorrectly initialized   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20471] TypeInfo_Array incorrectly initialized   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20558] __DATE__ and __TIMESTAMP__ use US-centric formats   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20608] [REG2.087] Cannot pass tuple.expand to auto ref T... template argument pack   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20608] [REG2.087] Cannot pass tuple.expand to auto ref T... template argument pack   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20608] [REG2.087] Cannot pass tuple.expand to auto ref T... template argument pack   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20709] Segmentation fault when importing nonexistent type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20709] Segmentation fault when importing nonexistent type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20709] Segmentation fault when importing nonexistent type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20710] ICE when statically accessing struct member containing empty array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20710] ICE when statically accessing struct member containing empty array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20710] ICE when statically accessing struct member containing empty array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20714] Struct with postblitting member does not call it's copy constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20724] Compiler fails to infer @safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20754] Aggregates inherit alignment of its members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20754] Aggregates inherit alignment of its members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20754] Aggregates inherit alignment of its members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20754] Aggregates inherit alignment of its members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20809] return statement might access memory from destructed temporary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20824] error messages generated by dmd build script can be prefixed with a non-standard "ERROR:"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20824] error messages generated by dmd build script can be prefixed with a non-standard "ERROR:"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20824] error messages generated by dmd build script can be prefixed with a non-standard "ERROR:"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20831] __traits(getAttributes) failes to compile when used on a parameter with no name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20831] __traits(getAttributes) failes to compile when used on a parameter with no name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20833] Template members prevent __traits(getOverloads) from working properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20833] Template members prevent __traits(getOverloads) from working properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20839] [dwarf] inherited fields not shwon   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20839] [dwarf] inherited fields not shwon   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20839] [dwarf] inherited fields not shwon   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20863] Passing aggregate types into templates by alias drops qualifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20863] Passing aggregate types into templates by alias drops qualifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20863] Passing aggregate types into templates by alias drops qualifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20876] DMD gives out not so helpful compile error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20879] Arrays are oblivious to copy constructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20879] Arrays are oblivious to copy constructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20879] Arrays are oblivious to copy constructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20881] [DIP1000] Templates seem to ignore 'return' (workaround)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20881] [DIP1000] Templates seem to ignore 'return' (workaround)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20881] [DIP1000] Templates seem to ignore 'return' (workaround)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20881] [DIP1000] Templates seem to ignore 'return' (workaround)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20881] [DIP1000] Templates seem to ignore 'return' (workaround)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20881] [DIP1000] Templates seem to ignore 'return' (workaround)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20881] [DIP1000] Templates seem to ignore 'return' (workaround)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20889] New: Support construction of std.bigint.BigInt from a sign and a byte-array magnitude   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20889] Support construction of std.bigint.BigInt from a sign and a byte-array magnitude   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20889] Support construction of std.bigint.BigInt from a sign and a byte-array magnitude   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20889] Support construction of std.bigint.BigInt from a sign and a byte-array magnitude   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20890] New: parameter corruption when other parameter is a static array of length 1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20890] parameter corruption when other parameter is a static array of length 1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20890] parameter corruption when other parameter is a static array of length 1   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20891] New: Android GC signals set inappropriately   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20892] [REG2.086] ElfFile comparison suboptimal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20892] [REG2.086] ElfFile comparison suboptimal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20892] New: [REG2.086] ElfFile comparison suboptimal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20893] [REG 2.087] 32-bit arithmetic goes wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20893] [REG 2.087] 32-bit arithmetic goes wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20893] [REG 2.087] 32-bit arithmetic goes wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20893] [REG 2.087] 32-bit arithmetic goes wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20893] New: [REG 2.087] 32-bit arithmetic goes wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20894] ICE: passing a member template mixin identifier as alias argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20894] ICE: passing a member template mixin identifier as alias argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20894] New: ICE: passing a member template mixin identifier as alias argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20895] Error with alias to struct member or member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20895] New: Error with alias to struct member or member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20896] New: this.__lambda2 has no value when trying to evaluate length of AliasSeq   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20896] this.__lambda2 has no value when trying to evaluate length of AliasSeq   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20897] -betterC generates `try`/`catch` in the AST when using struct destructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20897] -betterC generates `try`/`catch` in the AST when using struct destructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20897] -betterC generates `try`/`catch` in the AST when using struct destructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20897] AST contains try/finally statements in -betterC mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20897] AST contains try/finally statements in -betterC mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20897] New: -betterC generates `try`/`catch` in the AST when using struct destructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20898] New: order dependency in evaluating pragma(inline) for functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20898] order dependency in evaluating pragma(inline) for functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20898] order dependency in evaluating pragma(inline) for functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20899] New: Qualifiers on alias parameters inconsistency between built-in types and user defined types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20899] Qualifiers on alias parameters inconsistency between built-in types and user defined types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20899] Qualifiers on alias parameters inconsistency between built-in types and user defined types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20900] New: dmd crashes on static foreach over infinite range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20901] arrays confuse static foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20901] arrays confuse static foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20901] arrays confuse static foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20901] New: arrays confuse static foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20901] static foreach must deep-copy front() per iteration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20902] New: add an VisualD link directly on dlang.org home page or download page   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20903] New: seg fault on long signed divide overflow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20903] seg fault on long signed divide overflow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20903] seg fault on long signed divide overflow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20903] seg fault on long signed divide overflow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20904] dip1000 implicit conversion delegates error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20904] dip1000 implicit conversion delegates error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20904] New: dip1000 implicit conversion delegates error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20905] An alias inside a static if results in an undefined identifier in some situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20905] An alias inside a static if results in an undefined identifier in some situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20905] New: An alias inside a static if results in an undefined identifier in some situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20906] New: unnecessary divide-by-zero errors when constant folding short circuits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20906] unnecessary divide-by-zero errors when constant folding short circuits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20906] unnecessary divide-by-zero errors when constant folding short circuits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20906] unnecessary divide-by-zero errors when constant folding short circuits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20907] New: [DIP1000] Unittest fails when duplicated   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20908] -preview=nosharedaccess requires zero-initializion for aggregates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20908] New: -preview=nosharedaccess requires zero-initializion for aggregates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20909] .offsetof fails on forward reference of field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20909] New: .offsetof fails on forward reference of field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20910] Default unittest runner reports wrong unittest count   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20910] Default unittest runner reports wrong unittest count   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20910] Default unittest runner reports wrong unittest count   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20910] Default unittest runner reports wrong unittest count   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20910] New: Unittest runner reports wrong unittest count   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20910] Unittest runner reports wrong unittest count   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20911] Documentation for test/unit is non-existant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20911] Documentation for test/unit is non-existant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20911] New: Documentation for test/unit is non-existant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20912] New: Compiler incorrectly lists non-matching overloads as matching in diagnostic   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20913] Array "forward reference" error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20913] New: Array "forward reference" error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20914] __xdtor bypasses function attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20914] New: __xdtor bypasses function attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20915] __traits(allMembers) results include custom version identifiers, which is unusable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20915] __traits(allMembers) results include custom version identifiers, which is unusable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20915] __traits(allMembers) results include custom version identifiers, which is unusable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20915] __traits(allMembers) results include custom version identifiers, which is unusable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20915] __traits(allMembers) results include custom version identifiers, which is unusable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20915] __traits(allMembers) results include custom version identifiers, which is unusable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20915] __traits(allMembers) results include custom version identifiers, which is unusable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20915] __traits(allMembers) results include custom version identifiers, which is unusable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20915] New: __traits(allMembers) results include custom version identifiers, which is unusable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20916] hard to find where a deprecation comes from   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20916] hard to find where a deprecation comes from   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20916] New: hard to find where a deprecation comes from   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20917] New: stacking alias this, drops data during assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20917] stacking alias this, drops data during assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20917] stacking alias this, drops data during assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20918] New: Compiler diagnostic for templates which throw should show the code which throws   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20919] DMD crash when '__traits' prints error involving a Parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20919] DMD crash when '__traits' prints error involving a Parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20919] New: DMD crash when '__traits' prints error involving a Parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20920] New: Typedef!int + Typedef!int => int? is this a typedef overlook?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20920] Typedef!int + Typedef!int => int? is this a typedef overlook?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20921] Cannot get frame pointer in templated static member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20921] New: Cannot get frame pointer in templated static member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20922] New: Cannot get frame pointer in templated member function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20923] New: Playing with types leads to not detailed error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20923] Redefinition of 'size_t' is affecting TypeStruct functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20923] Redefinition of 'size_t' is affecting TypeStruct functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20923] Redefinition of 'size_t' is affecting TypeStruct functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20924] New: std.numeric.gcd cannot be used with const BigInt   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20924] std.numeric.gcd cannot be used with const BigInt   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20925] New: pragma(inline) should emit code to the calling CU + appropriate linker flags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20925] pragma(inline) should emit code to the calling CU + appropriate linker flags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20925] pragma(inline) should emit code to the calling CU + appropriate linker flags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20925] pragma(inline) should emit code to the calling CU + appropriate linker flags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20925] pragma(inline) should emit code to the calling CU + appropriate linker flags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20925] pragma(inline) should emit code to the calling CU + appropriate linker flags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20925] pragma(inline) should emit code to the calling CU + appropriate linker flags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20925] pragma(inline) should emit code to the calling CU + appropriate linker flags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20925] pragma(inline) should emit code to the calling CU + appropriate linker flags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20925] pragma(inline) should emit code to the calling CU + appropriate linker flags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20925] pragma(inline) should emit code to the calling CU + appropriate linker flags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20926] New: Autotester timing out does not say what operation timed out   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20927] GIT HEAD: dmd gets confused if a struct defines copy constructor, but the struct using it does not   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20927] GIT HEAD: dmd gets confused if a struct defines copy constructor, but the struct using it does not   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20927] New: GIT HEAD: dmd gets confused if a struct defines copy constructor, but the struct using it does not   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20928] New: Overloaded opIndex confuses MapResult   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20928] Overloaded opIndex confuses MapResult   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20928] Overloaded opIndex confuses MapResult   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20929] New: std.experimental.allocator.expandArray's range-based overload fails to instantiate for char and wchar arrays.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20929] std.experimental.allocator.expandArray's range-based overload fails to instantiate for char and wchar arrays.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20929] std.experimental.allocator.expandArray's range-based overload fails to instantiate for char and wchar arrays.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20930] New: std.zip: Remove 4 GB size limit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20931] code which was executed at ctfe should be accounted for in coverage   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20931] code which was executed at ctfe should be accounted for in coverage   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20931] code which was executed at ctfe should be accounted for in coverage   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20931] New: code which was executed at ctfe should be accounted for in coverage   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20932] New: Need a stableStaticSort to complement staticSort   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20933] druntime: core.thread doesn't support shadow stack   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20933] New: druntime: core.thread doesn't support shadow stack   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20934] New: preview=dtorfields segfaults for struct template with disabled default constructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20935] Installer fails with incorrect signature   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20935] New: Installer fails with incorrect signature   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20936] New: core.sync.rwmutex should have shared overloads (and make it usable in @safe code)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20937] New: std.range.array of a lengthless range with indirection is not @safe   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20938] Cannot create const arrays mixing immutable and mutable structs with indirections   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20938] Cannot create const arrays mixing immutable and mutable structs with indirections   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20938] New: Cannot create const arrays mixing immutable and mutable structs with indirections   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20939] New: sha.digest.sha: increase the speed of SHA256 and SHA512 in non-optimized builds, and bring optimized DMD builds closer to the speed of LDC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20939] sha.digest.sha: increase the speed of SHA256 and SHA512 in non-optimized builds, and bring optimized DMD builds closer to the speed of LDC   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20940] DMD silently ignores struct copy constructor if one of the element struct has postblit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20940] New: DMD silently ignores struct copy constructor if one of the element struct has postblit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20941] __traits(getMember) should not allow safe code to access private fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20941] New: __traits(getMember) should not allow safe code to access private fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20942] [DMD HEAD] Unable to append a postblit disabled struct to a dynamic array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20942] New: [DMD HEAD] Unable to append a postblit disabled struct to a dynamic array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20943] New: std.algorithm.setops.cartesianProduct fails for ranges with @system popFront   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20943] std.algorithm.setops.cartesianProduct fails for ranges with @system popFront   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20943] std.algorithm.setops.cartesianProduct fails for ranges with @system popFront   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20943] std.algorithm.setops.cartesianProduct fails for ranges with @system popFront   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20944] New: proper typedef refInt = ref int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20944] proper typedef refInt = ref int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20944] proper typedef refInt = ref int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20944] proper typedef refInt = ref int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20945] alias x = ref y compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20945] alias x = ref y compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20945] alias x = ref y compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20945] alias x = ref y compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20945] alias x = ref y compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20945] New: alias x = ref y compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20946] New: Segfault by forward reference and undefined identifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20946] Segfault by forward reference and undefined identifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20946] Segfault by forward reference and undefined identifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20946] Segfault by forward reference and undefined identifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20946] Segfault by forward reference and undefined identifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20946] Segfault by forward reference and undefined identifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20947] Azure Pipelines / Azure pipelines (Windows x64) fails with irrelevant Heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20947] New: Azure Pipelines / Azure pipelines (Windows x64) fails with irrelevant Heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20948] New: std.getopt: Support std.getop.config.positional   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20949] New: std.range.popFront is unsafe in release mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20949] std.range.popFront is unsafe in release mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20949] std.range.popFront is unsafe in release mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20950] New: std.conv.text shouldn't needlessly allocate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20950] std.conv.text(int) shouldn't needlessly allocate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20950] std.conv.text(int) shouldn't needlessly allocate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20950] std.conv.text(int) shouldn't needlessly allocate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20950] std.conv.text(int) shouldn't needlessly allocate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20950] std.conv.text(int) shouldn't needlessly allocate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20950] std.conv.text shouldn't needlessly allocate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20951] New: Wrong Decimal Literals Encoding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20951] Wrong Decimal Literals Encoding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20951] Wrong Decimal Literals Encoding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20951] Wrong Decimal Literals Encoding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20951] Wrong Decimal Literals Encoding   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20952] Can't represent subnormal numbers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20952] New: Can't represent subnormal numbers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20953] New: Unexpected CTFE double literals behavior   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20953] Unexpected CTFE double literals behavior   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20954] New: spawn in unitest: compiler error, confusing message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20954] spawn in unitest: compiler error, confusing message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20955] New: Test suite times out running tests in dmd/test, but leaves no clue which test hung   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20955] Test suite times out running tests in dmd/test, but leaves no clue which test hung   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20956] [DIP1000] @safe defeated by closure capturing ref parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20956] New: [DIP1000] @safe defeated by closure capturing ref parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20957] New: void member initialisation is ignored for out struct parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20957] void member initialisation is ignored for out struct parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20958] dmd crash in glue layer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20958] dmd crash in glue layer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20958] dmd crash in glue layer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20958] incomplete semantic analysis when generating code for function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20958] incomplete semantic analysis when generating code for function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20958] incomplete semantic analysis when generating code for function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20958] New: dmd crash in glue layer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20959] New: Indexing a pointer of a fwd-declared struct type is NOT a frontend error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20960] -profile=gc does not track class objects allocated with new   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20960] -profile=gc does not track class objects allocated with new   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20960] -profile=gc does not track class objects allocated with new   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20960] -profile=gc does not track class objects allocated with new   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20960] -profile=gc does not track class objects allocated with new   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20960] New: -profile=gc does not track class objects allocated with new   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20961] New: Make is-Template easier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20962] New: Template parameter evaluating to D style array prevents implicit conversion of function literal to extern(C++)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20963] New: wrong code for cast(double)anUlong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20963] wrong code for cast(double)anUlong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20964] New: poor CTFE support for backward pointer (iterator) iteration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20964] poor CTFE support for backward pointer (iterator) iteration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20964] poor CTFE support for backward pointer iteration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20965] Implicitly generated postblit overrides disabled copy ctor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20965] Implicitly generated postblit overrides disabled copy ctor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20965] Implicitly generated postblit overrides disabled copy ctor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20965] New: Implicitly generated postblit overrides disabled copy ctor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20966] New: std.typecons.Tuple cannot handle non-copyable types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20967] New: Decimal string parsing isn't IEEE compatible   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20968] Linker error of uninstantiated templated `opEquals` member of struct when compiled with -preview=in   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20968] Linker error of uninstantiated templated `opEquals` member of struct when compiled with -preview=in   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20968] Linker error of uninstantiated templated `opEquals` member of struct when compiled with -preview=in   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20968] New: Linker error of uninstantiated templated `opEquals` member of struct when compiled with -preview=in   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20969] alias to local in static   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20969] alias to local in static instance of a struct causes segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20969] alias to local in static instance of a struct causes segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20969] alias to local in static instance of a struct causes segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20969] alias to local in static instance of a struct causes segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20969] alias to local in static instance of a struct causes segfault   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20969] alias to local in static instance of a struct causes segfault when read   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20969] New: alias to local in static   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20970] New: Test Suite Azure Pipelines Windows_LDC_Debug x64-debug-ldc failed due to heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20970] Test Suite Azure Pipelines Windows_LDC_Debug x64-debug-ldc failed due to heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20970] Test Suite Azure Pipelines Windows_LDC_Debug x64-debug-ldc failed due to heisenbug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20971] New: When parsing identifiers, unicode LS and PS are considered an error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20972] New: wrong real literals on windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20972] wrong real literals on windows   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20973] New: Compiler error: more than 32767 symbols in object file   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20974] New: extern(C++, "foo", "bar") template mangling ignores "foo".   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20975] New: Symbol conflict error message refers to aliased symbol instead of the alias when imported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20976] New: pipe documentation incorrectly renders part of memoize   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20977] New: Move phobos to semver   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20978] New: Add versioning to phobos   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20979] New: Which compiler is used by test/run.d?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20979] Which compiler is used by test/run.d?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20980] New: std.bigint.BigInt: special case x & 1 to avoid unnecessary allocation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20980] std.bigint.BigInt: special case x & 1 to avoid unnecessary allocation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20981] New: Segfault for inlined __simd_sto   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20981] Runtime segfault for inlined __simd_sto   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20981] Segfault for inlined __simd_sto   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20981] Segfault for inlined __simd_sto   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20981] Segfault for inlined __simd_sto   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20981] Segfault for inlined __simd_sto   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20981] Segfault for inlined __simd_sto   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20981] Segfault for inlined __simd_sto   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20982] Add a pragma to suppress deprecation messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20982] Add a pragma to suppress deprecation messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20982] Add a pragma to suppress deprecation messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20982] Add a pragma to suppress deprecation messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20982] Add a pragma to suppress deprecation messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20982] Add a pragma to suppress deprecation messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20982] Add a pragma to suppress deprecation messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20982] Add a pragma to suppress deprecation messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20982] Add a pragma to suppress deprecation messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20982] New: Add a pragma to suppress deprecation messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20983] Insufficient garbage collection in std.format context   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20983] Insufficient garbage collection in std.format context   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20983] New: Insufficient garbage collection in std.format context   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20984] Heisenbug: FreeBSD64 Phobos random test suite failure in std/process   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20984] New: Heisenbug: FreeBSD64 Phobos random test suite failure in std/process   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20985] New: std.socket random failures due to environment socket.d(1004)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20985] std.socket random failures due to environment socket.d(1004)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20986] New: TestSuite 'CyberShadow/DAutoTest — Build failed' on download failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20986] TestSuite 'CyberShadow/DAutoTest — Build failed' on download failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20986] TestSuite 'CyberShadow/DAutoTest — Build failed' on download failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20987] incompatible types for... when opBinary "in" overloading   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20987] incompatible types for... when opBinary "in" overloading   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20987] incompatible types for... when opBinary "in" overloading   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20987] New: incompatible types for... when opBinary "in" overloading   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20988] Missing error for negated array.ptr   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20988] Missing error for negated array.ptr   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20988] New: Missing error for negated array.ptr   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20989] Checking array.ptr causes safety error with -checkaction=context   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20989] New: Checking array.ptr causes safety error with -checkaction=context   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20990] New: Optimizer should move cold branches to the end of the function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20990] Optimizer should move cold branches to the end of the function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20990] Optimizer should move cold branches to the end of the function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20990] Optimizer should move cold branches to the end of the function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20990] Optimizer should move cold branches to the end of the function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20991] New: Optimizer is not unlining various forms of simple loops   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20991] Optimizer is not unlining various forms of simple loops   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20991] Optimizer is not unlining various forms of simple loops   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20991] Optimizer is not unlining various forms of simple loops   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20992] Missing symbols in winapi bindings, related to locals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20992] New: Missing symbols in winapi bindings, related to locals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20993] New: spec claims extern(C) and extern(D) function are identical   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20994] -preview=dip1008 ok, adding -preview=dip1021 crashes compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20994] New: -preview=dip1008 ok, adding -preview=dip1021 crashes compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20995] New: Range violation with -preview=dip1021   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20995] Range violation with -preview=dip1021   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20995] Range violation with -preview=dip1021   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20995] Range violation with -preview=dip1021   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20996] -preview=dip1021 ICE given one liner throw program   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20996] -preview=dip1021 ICE given one liner throw program   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20996] New: -preview=dip1021 ICE given one liner throw program   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3031] scoped static var conflicts   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3546] Aliasing an element of a static array should be legal if the index is a compile time constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3546] Aliasing an element of a static array should be legal if the index is a compile time constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3546] Aliasing an element of a static array should be legal if the index is a compile time constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3546] Aliasing an element of a static array should be legal if the index is a compile time constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3546] Aliasing an element of a static array should be legal if the index is a compile time constant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3632] modify float is float to do a bitwise compare   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4071] Missing support to share memory and objects between DLLs and executable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 4917] Symbol conflict error message refers to aliased symbol instead of the alias   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6474] aliasing type tuple elements' members is onerous   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7205] Function attribute inference fails in case of mutual dependencies   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7791] Unnecessarily slow test in the DMD test suite   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7791] Unnecessarily slow test in the DMD test suite   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 7960] link-failure optlink crash EIP=00000000   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8083] Throwing in a loop results in infinite bypassing exception messages   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9072] some tests from the dmd test suite actually test the library, not the compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9482] Option to compile in release mode, but keep in contracts on non-private functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9482] Option to compile in release mode, but keep in contracts on non-private functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9482] Option to compile in release mode, but keep in contracts on non-private functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9816] Export is mostly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com

Last message date: Tue Jun 30 22:57:00 UTC 2020
Archived on: Tue Jun 30 22:57:06 UTC 2020

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...