Request: add a flag to get ddbg_gdb behavior

[Jascha Wetzel]

i agree.
actually i was getting annoyed by this myself, but apparently not
annoyed enough to induce the idea to change it ;)
since CB won't let you specify command line options for the debugger
atm, i'll add this as a command as well.
it'll be in the next release.

Bill Baxter wrote:
> Renaming the exe to get different behavior is a neat trick, and I know
> it is relatively common in the Unix world.  It makes sense there because
> symlinks are rock solid.  However, in Windows it means I have to make a
> copy of the exe every time I upgrade ddbg.  I'm not worried about the
> tiny bit of disk space the extra copy uses, but just the annoyance
> factor.  Anyway, I see no real advantage to typing 'ddbg_gdb' vs 'ddbg
> -gdb'.
> 
> I think there was also one person who accidentally re-named ddbg as
> ddgb_dbg or something like that, and couldn't figure out why the
> integration with Code::Blocks wasn't working.  If that were a flag the
> program could raise an error saying '-dbg is not a recognized flag'. But
> it would be a bad idea to raise an error about the program name itself
> not being what you expected.
> 
> --bb