talk about dwt,jface executable size
torhu
no at spam.invalid
Sat May 24 07:13:31 PDT 2008
yidabu wrote:
> dwt hello world size : 1.50 MB
> jface hello world size: 2.52 MB
>
> the size is not too big!
> the main issue seems too long to build a static library by dsss, this may be a dsss issue.
> I hope that dmd 1.031 will fix the anonymous classe bug and we can use the -lib build flag to build a static dwt lib, dwtx.lib
>
> tested with dwt-win svn, dwt-addons svn, dmd 1.028
> build dwt.lib and dwtx.lib by dsss 0.75
> testd on Windows XP
>
>
> dwt helloworld:
>
> code:
>
> import dwt.widgets.Display;
> import dwt.widgets.Shell;
> pragma(lib, "dwt.lib");
> pragma(lib, "dwtx.lib");
> void main ()
> {
> auto display = new Display;
> auto shell = new Shell(display);
> shell.setText = "Hello DWT World ";
> shell.open;
> while (!shell.isDisposed)
> if (!display.readAndDispatch)
> display.sleep;
>
> display.dispose;
> }
>
> build command:
>
> dmd test.d dwt.res -L/SUBSYSTEM:windows:5 -L/rc:dwt.res -J..\dwt-samples\res -J..\dwt-addons\res -release
>
> executable size:
> 1.50 MB
>
I tried building this, and got a 1.39 MB exe. It's still quite big. My
DWT application is 1.64 MB, which I don't see as a major problem. So
the size difference isn't huge between a minimal app and a real app.
I built DWT (rev. 211) with dsss, with oneatatime=yes and only '-O
-release', no inlining. Then I build the app using bud, with inlining
enabled. I don't know how much the inlining matters, since building dwt
takes 35 minutes on my pc, I haven't bothered to test much. So I'm
really looking forward to dmd 1.031, with a usable -lib switch.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-dwt
mailing list