Why do we still need/use .di 'header' files?

[John Reimer]

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:17:41 -0800, Jarrett Billingsley  
<kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> "Don Clugston" <dac at nospam.com.au> wrote in message
> news:ejkbnm$1qb1$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>>
>> Protection attributes and many other things are not in the decorated
>> names.
>> What about templates, and conditional compilation?
>
> This is why there needs to be a "D object file" format.. :P  That would  
> be a
> killer feature IMO.
>
>


Totally agree with this!  It would also shed a whole lot of other problems  
for D.