Why do we still need/use .di 'header' files?

[Chris Nicholson-Sauls]

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> "Don Clugston" <dac at nospam.com.au> wrote in message 
> news:ejkbnm$1qb1$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
> 
>>Protection attributes and many other things are not in the decorated 
>>names.
>>What about templates, and conditional compilation?
> 
> 
> This is why there needs to be a "D object file" format.. :P  That would be a 
> killer feature IMO. 
> 
> 

It might kill C compatability in some cases... /but/ having such a thing, with perhaps a 
compiler switch to emit "legacy" object files, would be nice -- and would make DDL far, 
far simpler to implement I'm sure.

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls