Strong size_t

[Kagamin]

Simen Kjærås Wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:22:58 +0100, Kagamin <spam at here.lot> wrote:
> 
> > Tried to create a stronger version of size_t which will not interoperate  
> > with int and long
> > http://codepad.org/47OB3nJi
> >
> > But for some reason can't compare struct to int using opEquals and  
> > opCmp. How to fix it? And should it? One can write `v==intp(42)` or  
> > `v<intp(43)`.
> 
> Have you tried to overload opEquals and opCmp for ints? That seems to
> work just fine for me:
> 
>      bool opEquals(int v) const { return value == v; }
>      int opCmp(int v) const
>      {
>          return value>v?1:value<v?-1:0;
>      }
> 
> Just add those to the intp struct.

It writes
Error: function strongintp.intp.opEquals type signature should be const bool(ref const(intp)) not const bool(ref const const(short) v)

Hmm... may be my compiler version is old and this was fixed...