Strong size_t

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:45:26 -0500, Kagamin <spam at here.lot> wrote:

> Simen Kjærås Wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:22:58 +0100, Kagamin <spam at here.lot> wrote:
>>
>> > Tried to create a stronger version of size_t which will not  
>> interoperate
>> > with int and long
>> > http://codepad.org/47OB3nJi
>> >
>> > But for some reason can't compare struct to int using opEquals and
>> > opCmp. How to fix it? And should it? One can write `v==intp(42)` or
>> > `v<intp(43)`.
>>
>> Have you tried to overload opEquals and opCmp for ints? That seems to
>> work just fine for me:
>>
>>      bool opEquals(int v) const { return value == v; }
>>      int opCmp(int v) const
>>      {
>>          return value>v?1:value<v?-1:0;
>>      }
>>
>> Just add those to the intp struct.
>
> It writes
> Error: function strongintp.intp.opEquals type signature should be const  
> bool(ref const(intp)) not const bool(ref const const(short) v)
>
> Hmm... may be my compiler version is old and this was fixed...

According to bugzilla, yes.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3659

-Steve