Allow empty field function arguments for default?
Christophe
travert at phare.normalesup.org
Fri Apr 20 02:17:18 PDT 2012
"Jakob Ovrum" , dans le message (digitalmars.D.learn:34948), a écrit :
> On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 18:34:41 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>
>> Named arguments would probably be better for this.
>>
>> fun(c = 5);
>
> Maybe so, but `fun(c = 5);` is not an additive change, while the
> OP's suggestion actually is.
How about
int c;
fun(c = 5);
?
--
Christophe
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list