Allow empty field function arguments for default?

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-04-20 11:17, Christophe wrote:
> "Jakob Ovrum" , dans le message (digitalmars.D.learn:34948), a écrit :
>> On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 18:34:41 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>>
>>> Named arguments would probably be better for this.
>>>
>>> fun(c = 5);
>>
>> Maybe so, but `fun(c = 5);` is not an additive change, while the
>> OP's suggestion actually is.
>
> How about
>
> int c;
> fun(c = 5);
>
> ?
>

I don't know. Default arguments would probably take precedence perhaps.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg