Transforming a range back to the original type?
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at yahoo.com
Fri May 4 13:37:23 PDT 2012
On Fri, 04 May 2012 16:05:25 -0400, Jakob Ovrum <jakobovrum at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Friday, 4 May 2012 at 19:17:13 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> This one:
>>
>> Collection c = new Collection();
>> c = c.filter!(x => x < 3).toCollection();
>>
>> filter isn't a property of c, it's a range-producing function. So I
>> only have to define filter once, as a range accepting, range producing
>> function. And any container type, as long as it can produce a range,
>> can use this as a pseudo method (via UFCS) to make a filtered copy of
>> itself.
>>
>> -Steve
>
> That's not a real example, that's pretty much the same example I
> provided below the part you quoted.
First, what would you consider a real example?
Second, there's an important piece of the use case that your sample lacks
-- Jacob is rebinding the result back to the original item.
So for example, I could see code like this:
void displayResults(Container c)
{
if(maxvalue)
c = c.filter!(x => x < maxvalue).makeContainer!Container();
// proceed to display elements from c
}
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list