D game engine -- Any suggestions?

Mineko uminekorox at gmail.com
Wed Nov 20 12:00:16 PST 2013


On Wednesday, 20 November 2013 at 19:38:09 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
>
> I would suggest dual license.
>
> GPL for open source projects and something else for commercial 
> projects.
>
> It all depends how you see companies using your code, without 
> any kind of retribution or recognition. I see this happening 
> all the time in the SaaS enterprise space I work on.
>
> For many companies open source means free beer.
>
> I wonder how much Sony was given back to the open source 
> projects that make up the PS4 besides the license note, for 
> example.
>
> http://www.scei.co.jp/ps4-license/
>
> Anyway it is your project, so it is up to you to decide what 
> license to use.
>
> --
> Paulo

Ahh ok, I was worried when you said that the GPL was viral, I was 
planning on a dual license, GPL for the actual engine, and maybe 
boost or something for the actual assets, of course that depends 
on who uses the code, as long as the engine itself is free and 
redistributed intact then everything is fine.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list