Is there a nice syntax to achieve optional named parameters?

[rikki cattermole]

On 16/01/2019 1:05 AM, John Burton wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 at 11:26:50 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
>> Longer term, you're better off with the builder.
> Thanks for your reply. But what is the builder?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Builder_pattern

One of the few OOP design patterns that I can agree with.