Is there a nice syntax to achieve optional named parameters?

[John Burton]

On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 at 12:15:41 UTC, rikki cattermole 
wrote:
> On 16/01/2019 1:05 AM, John Burton wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 at 11:26:50 UTC, rikki cattermole 
>> wrote:
>>> Longer term, you're better off with the builder.
>> Thanks for your reply. But what is the builder?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Builder_pattern
>
> One of the few OOP design patterns that I can agree with.

Ah right, that.
Thank you.
Hmm that would work.