Breaking ";" rule with lambda functions

[pascal111]

On Monday, 1 August 2022 at 19:32:41 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> On Monday, 1 August 2022 at 14:52:03 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
>> [...]
>
> From [the relevant section of the language spec:][1]
>
>> [...]
>
> In other words, a function literal is an expression that 
> evaluates to either a delegate or a function pointer.
>
I'm not sure I'm understanding this, but it seems ok;

> You are correct that, strictly speaking, it is wrong to say 
> that a function literal "is" an anonymous function (rather than 
> "refers to" or "points to" one). However, the distinction 
> usually does not matter in practice, so most D programmers use 
> the terms interchangeably.
>
> [1]: https://dlang.org/spec/expression.html#function_literals

My complaint is about that a function is not a same as an 
expression that functions return values, but expressions being 
evaluated to provide values.