Why is this not allowed?

[ryuukk_]

On Saturday, 5 October 2024 at 16:40:46 UTC, Salih Dincer wrote:
> On Saturday, 5 October 2024 at 06:35:57 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
>>
>> No, i don't want to do:
>>
>>
>> ```C
>> struct EntityDef
>> {
>>     struct Stats
>>     {
>>         int hp;
>>     } stats;
>> }
>> ```
>>
>> Repeating the same name 3 times, i should go back to the stone 
>> age too no?
>>
>> C and all other C like languages allow me to be concise
>>
>> Why is it a D thing to be backward?
>
> In the coding scheme, fields/members/methods may be at the 
> beginning, middle, or end of the structure, or may not be 
> identifiers to the right of the anonymous structs. In 
> structures, a lot (I wish it was in bitfield) has been taken 
> from C. Especially not using typedef and not having extra 
> semicolons make D stand out even with these. As for anonymous 
> structures, they have to be like this in order to be used with 
> unions.
>
> I think everything is as it should be, and even more: Please 
> include the relevant comment line (the // characters next to 
> the anonymous struct) in the code and be amazed by the change :)
>
> ```d
> struct Foo
> {
>     int bar;
>
>     //struct {/*
>     Baz baz;
>     struct Baz
>     {
>         auto opAssign(int value)
>           => baz = value;//*/
>         int baz;
>     }
> }
>
> void main()
> {
>     Foo foo;
>     foo.bar = 7;
>     foo.baz = 42;
>     
>     imported!"std.stdio".writeln(foo); /*
>     with opAssign()      Anonymous
>     Foo(7, Baz(42))  or  Foo(7, 42)    */
> }
> ```
>
> Thank you to the creators and maintainers of the D.
>
> SDB at 79

I'll pretend you didn't say anything, because your solution is 
just bad