implicit cast and overload priority

[mig09]

On Monday, 17 February 2025 at 09:17:24 UTC, ShadoLight wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 February 2025 at 17:04:39 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
> wrote:
> [..]
>>
>
> Ok, gotcha. I suspected that is what you meant and agree with 
> that (in my example an implicit match would more sense on 
> 'long', not 'bool').
>
> Thanks for the detailed answer.

If compilers could read minds, implicit matching would always be 
perfect)