implicit cast and overload priority

[ShadoLight]

On Monday, 17 February 2025 at 09:33:32 UTC, mig09 wrote:
> On Monday, 17 February 2025 at 09:17:24 UTC, ShadoLight wrote:
>> On Sunday, 16 February 2025 at 17:04:39 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
>> wrote:
>> [..]
>>>
>>
>> Ok, gotcha. I suspected that is what you meant and agree with 
>> that (in my example an implicit match would more sense on 
>> 'long', not 'bool').
>>
>> Thanks for the detailed answer.
>
> If compilers could read minds, implicit matching would always 
> be perfect)

True. And then compilers would also know that, of all the things 
I've lost, I miss my mind the most!