Give struct the status it deserves

[Hasan Aljudy]

What's wrong with classes?!

Classes won't make your code slow.

Hong wrote:
> Thanks, that is one work arounds, the avoidance approach.
> There are 2 approaches to structs,
> 
> 1. Minimalist approach, use structs only for C interfaces, and tiny data types
> such as Point for GUI programming. Most Java programmer would prefer this.
> 
> 2. Use structs for all data structures that do not require heap allocation, such
> as containers. MinTL is a good example. However, current support for struct
> makes this approach difficult. People used to C++ might prefer this approach,
> when performance is critical. If D is to gain a foot hold on the high
> performance computing world, such as scientific computing, more support for
> struct will be needed.
> 
> In article <e044ro$ifn$1 at digitaldaemon.com>, Hasan Aljudy says...
> 
>>structs are a light wieght alternative to classes.
>>Seriously, if structs don't suffice for your needs, use classes! You 
>>won't lose /that/ much performance.
> 
> 
>