Proposal: Operator overloading without temporaries

[kris]

Sean Kelly wrote:
> Charles wrote:
> 
>> Wow looks good ... too good.  How could this have gone 
>> un[noticed|implemented] in the  last 20 years ?  I'm anxious to here 
>> Walters take.
> 
> 
> I have a feeling this may be a lot more difficult in C++ because of 
> ADL--there are simply a lot more functions to be evaluated when building 
> expression trees.  Also, the standard doesn't seem to consider things 
> from a compiler writer's perspective, which this three-value code 
> optimization requires.
> 
> 
> Sean

ADL? Does that stand for Attention Deficit Level?