Proposal: Operator overloading without temporaries

[pragma]

In article <e09v1r$2tb0$1 at digitaldaemon.com>, kris says...
>
>Sean Kelly wrote:
>> Charles wrote:
>> 
>>> Wow looks good ... too good.  How could this have gone 
>>> un[noticed|implemented] in the  last 20 years ?  I'm anxious to here 
>>> Walters take.
>> 
>> 
>> I have a feeling this may be a lot more difficult in C++ because of 
>> ADL--there are simply a lot more functions to be evaluated when building 
>> expression trees.  Also, the standard doesn't seem to consider things 
>> from a compiler writer's perspective, which this three-value code 
>> optimization requires.
>> 
>> 
>> Sean
>
>ADL? Does that stand for Attention Deficit Level?

Sorry, I missed this entire thread.  What's this about now? 

<g>

- EricAnderton at yahoo