Holy Win32 Voids, Batman!

[John Reimer]

On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:47:28 -0800, kris wrote:


> 
> It's all legal D, and kosher for C-based code. The downside is that when 
> you miss out certain " = void;" (for specific Win32 structs) you'll get 
> a ungrokable linker error.
> 
> See Sean's recent post on "Big problem with Small programs" for the true 
> culprit.


Aye...  I forgot about that D feature... and it's even documented.  It's a
perfect workaround for this situation (and you've verified it works, I
assume).

You must have distracted me by titling you posts with all those annoyingly
catchy quotes and references. :D

-JJR