Qt and KDELibs for D?
Gregor Richards
Richards at codu.org
Mon Jan 29 08:26:15 PST 2007
It's much, much easier to bind a C library than a C++ library.
qtc is a C binding to Qt.
- Gregor Richards
PS: I don't know if it uses the same nasty preprocessor junk as Qt C++ ...
PPS: However, after binding it, you won't have anything like the
original interface - you'll have a very OO-lacking C interface.
just jeff wrote:
> Firstly, is anybody working on Qt bindings for D? If so, the rest of
> this message is probably irrelevant and can safely be ignored. But
> continuing under the assumption that nobody is... :P
>
> I'm wondering what would be involved in a project like that. Has anybody
> looked into hooking into C++ libraries enough to know what would be the
> best plan of attack? (And for Qt in particular, I hear it uses some
> custom pre-processor magic on top of the standard C++ one; is this
> right, and is this likely to be a huge problem?)
>
> Qt Jambi
> (http://doc.trolltech.com/qtjambi-1.0/com/trolltech/qt/qtjambi-index.html)
> seems to be doing a similar thing for Java, so I presume they got over
> any problems with multiple inheritance. What other major problems would
> there be?
>
> Any random thoughts appreciated.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list