Library standardization

[Bill Baxter]

e-t172 wrote:
> Koroskin Denis a écrit :
>> Current situation is, someone writes code, probably nice one, and it 
>> is added
>> to main trunk. Problem is, interface is implementation driven, not 
>> otherwise.
>> It is not discussed. And thats bad. Tests first, then code, Kent Beck 
>> said.
>> Of course, implementation can affect interface, but only after trial.
> 
> I have to agree on this one. As a side note, I definitely think we 
> *need* "real" header files (like .h files in C/C++), which separates the 
> API and his implementation. I see for advantages:

I think the automatic .di generation is a better.  I just wish it 
generated human-readable output rather than stripping all indentation.

--bb