Library standardization

[e-t172]

Bill Baxter a écrit :
> e-t172 wrote:
>> Koroskin Denis a écrit :
>>> Current situation is, someone writes code, probably nice one, and it 
>>> is added
>>> to main trunk. Problem is, interface is implementation driven, not 
>>> otherwise.
>>> It is not discussed. And thats bad. Tests first, then code, Kent Beck 
>>> said.
>>> Of course, implementation can affect interface, but only after trial.
>>
>> I have to agree on this one. As a side note, I definitely think we 
>> *need* "real" header files (like .h files in C/C++), which separates 
>> the API and his implementation. I see for advantages:
> 
> I think the automatic .di generation is a better.  I just wish it 
> generated human-readable output rather than stripping all indentation.

Automatic .di generation would be just great if it actually stripped 
implementation (see my P.S.).