Who favors the current D1 situation?

[Walter Bright]

Jesse Phillips wrote:
> I'm with Jason and Gregor on this one. Would it be nice to have these 
> changes, yes, but I don't think that is the way to look at it. Even if D3 
> is completely compatibly with all D2 code, I wouldn't want it be in the 
> D2 tree. 

I also can see problems with having to support even more versions of D 
if D 1.0 gets semantic changes.