Thread.sleep (DMD 2.020)
Sean Kelly
sean at invisibleduck.org
Sat Nov 1 09:30:36 PDT 2008
Sean Kelly wrote:
> John C wrote:
>> I think Thread.sleep, which was introduced in core.thread in 2.020, is
>> broken on Win32. No matter what value I pass to the function, it
>> merely sleeps for 1 millisecond. Looks like the problem is here:
>>
>> period = period < TICKS_PER_MILLI ? 1 : //
>> <------------------------------------------------- BUG?
>> period / TICKS_PER_MILLI;
>>
>> Should it be testing if period is greater than MAX_SLEEP_MILLS, rather
>> than less than TICKS_PER_MILLI?
>
> This test was meant to make the min sleep time 1 millisecond, but I
> think I'm going to remove it.
Oh, I should mention that Thread.sleep() actually works correctly, even
with this check in place. The sleep parameter uses a 100ns resolution,
so to sleep for one millisecond you must use 10_000, while to sleep for
one second it's 10_000_000. This isn't the same as Windows, which uses
a millisecond resolution. I've tested this routine on Windows, however,
and have verified that it works correctly. The docs are wrong however,
as they say 500 = one millisecond. I'll fix that.
Sean
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list