Thread.sleep (DMD 2.020)
John C
johnch_atms at hotmail.com
Sat Nov 1 09:50:40 PDT 2008
Sean Kelly Wrote:
> Sean Kelly wrote:
> > John C wrote:
> >> I think Thread.sleep, which was introduced in core.thread in 2.020, is
> >> broken on Win32. No matter what value I pass to the function, it
> >> merely sleeps for 1 millisecond. Looks like the problem is here:
> >>
> >> period = period < TICKS_PER_MILLI ? 1 : //
> >> <------------------------------------------------- BUG?
> >> period / TICKS_PER_MILLI;
> >>
> >> Should it be testing if period is greater than MAX_SLEEP_MILLS, rather
> >> than less than TICKS_PER_MILLI?
> >
> > This test was meant to make the min sleep time 1 millisecond, but I
> > think I'm going to remove it.
>
> Oh, I should mention that Thread.sleep() actually works correctly, even
> with this check in place. The sleep parameter uses a 100ns resolution,
> so to sleep for one millisecond you must use 10_000, while to sleep for
> one second it's 10_000_000. This isn't the same as Windows, which uses
> a millisecond resolution. I've tested this routine on Windows, however,
> and have verified that it works correctly. The docs are wrong however,
> as they say 500 = one millisecond. I'll fix that.
>
>
> Sean
Now you tell me :-)
Win32's Sleep(50) seems to be the same as Thread.sleep(500_000). Is that right?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list