Thread.sleep (DMD 2.020)

John C johnch_atms at hotmail.com
Sat Nov 1 09:50:40 PDT 2008


Sean Kelly Wrote:

> Sean Kelly wrote:
> > John C wrote:
> >> I think Thread.sleep, which was introduced in core.thread in 2.020, is 
> >> broken on Win32. No matter what value I pass to the function, it 
> >> merely sleeps for 1 millisecond. Looks like the problem is here:
> >>
> >>   period = period < TICKS_PER_MILLI ?     1 : // 
> >> <------------------------------------------------- BUG?
> >>     period / TICKS_PER_MILLI;
> >>
> >> Should it be testing if period is greater than MAX_SLEEP_MILLS, rather 
> >> than less than TICKS_PER_MILLI?
> > 
> > This test was meant to make the min sleep time 1 millisecond, but I 
> > think I'm going to remove it.
> 
> Oh, I should mention that Thread.sleep() actually works correctly, even 
> with this check in place.  The sleep parameter uses a 100ns resolution, 
> so to sleep for one millisecond you must use 10_000, while to sleep for 
> one second it's 10_000_000.  This isn't the same as Windows, which uses 
> a millisecond resolution.  I've tested this routine on Windows, however, 
> and have verified that it works correctly.  The docs are wrong however, 
> as they say 500 = one millisecond.  I'll fix that.
> 
> 
> Sean

Now you tell me :-)

Win32's Sleep(50) seems to be the same as Thread.sleep(500_000). Is that right?



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list