invariant()
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.com
Sun Apr 12 05:57:28 PDT 2009
In D1 you had to write:
invariant
{
...
}
while in D2, to disabiguate with invariant being overloaded with
immutability you had to write:
invariant()
{
...
}
Now that the use of the invariant keyword in D2 has returned to its
single original meaning of class invariant, is there still a reason for
it to require an empty parenthesis? Should I fill a bug?
--
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.com
http://michelf.com/
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list