two semantic change proposals

[davidl]

在 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:21:05 +0800，Steven Schveighoffer  
<schveiguy at yahoo.com> 写道:

> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:58:32 -0400, davidl <davidl at nospam.org> wrote:
>
>> I believe the following allow the runtime reflection wrapper. Though it  
>> changes the old semantics, the old one can be implemented on top of the  
>> new semantics
>>
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2868
>>
>>
>
>
> That's cool.
>
> However, you have misunderstood how the opDot function name should be  
> passed via templates.
>
> The opDot signature should not take a type as the first argument, but a  
> string.  Otherwise, you have no compile-time abilities with the function  
> name:
>
> opDot(string methodname, T...)(T args)
>
> instead of
>
> opDot(U:immutable(char)[], T...)(U methodname, T args)
>
> -Steve

It's said there will be soon "static string" param.

I think the prototype might best be refined that time.


-- 
使用 Opera 革命性的电子邮件客户程序: http://www.opera.com/mail/