Few mixed things

[Nick Sabalausky]

"BCS" <ao at pathlink.com> wrote in message 
news:78ccfa2d3e7918cb909fe7a39778 at news.digitalmars.com...
> Reply to Denis,
>
>>> I'd be fine depricating /**/.
>>>
>> You mean, deprecating /++/?
>>
>
> No, I mean exactly what I said.
> /**/ has well defined semantics, changing it will cause problems that 
> replacing it will not.
>

Are there any problems you see with it other than porting code to D? (FWIW, 
I've never come across any code that had a /* in between a /* and */.)