Few mixed things

[Paul D. Anderson]

Nick Sabalausky Wrote:

> "BCS" <ao at pathlink.com> wrote in message 
> news:78ccfa2d3e7918cb909fe7a39778 at news.digitalmars.com...
> > Reply to Denis,
> >
> >>> I'd be fine depricating /**/.
> >>>
> >> You mean, deprecating /++/?
> >>
> >
> > No, I mean exactly what I said.
> > /**/ has well defined semantics, changing it will cause problems that 
> > replacing it will not.
> >
> 
> Are there any problems you see with it other than porting code to D? (FWIW, 
> I've never come across any code that had a /* in between a /* and */.) 
> 
> 

I've seen lots of code that did that.

Now, if you mean code that intentionally did that...


Paul