Yet another strike against the current AA implementation

[Christopher Wright]

Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> 
>> Georg Wrede wrote:
>>> There's an illusion. And that illusion comes from the D newsgroups 
>>> having "wrong" names.
>>>  The D2 newsgroup should have a name like "D2 discussion -- for D 
>>> language development folks, enter at your own risk". And a *D1* 
>>> newsgroup should then be for anybody who actually uses the language 
>>> for something. Currently, actually, the D.learn newsgroup has sort-of 
>>> assumed this functionality.
>>
>> Yes, well put. I think it would be great to define a digitalmars.d2 or 
>> digitalmars.d2-design newsgroup.
> 
> And what would we do the day D987 came out? Start another group called
> digitalmars.d987-design? Or just create one called digitalmars.d.design,
> and use that no matter the version of D being discussed?
> 
> -- 
> Simen

How about digitalmars.dnext?