Yet another strike against the current AA implementation

[Denis Koroskin]

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:38:27 +0400, Christopher Wright <dhasenan at gmail.com> wrote:

> Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Georg Wrede wrote:
>>>> There's an illusion. And that illusion comes from the D newsgroups  
>>>> having "wrong" names.
>>>>  The D2 newsgroup should have a name like "D2 discussion -- for D  
>>>> language development folks, enter at your own risk". And a *D1*  
>>>> newsgroup should then be for anybody who actually uses the language  
>>>> for something. Currently, actually, the D.learn newsgroup has sort-of  
>>>> assumed this functionality.
>>>
>>> Yes, well put. I think it would be great to define a digitalmars.d2 or  
>>> digitalmars.d2-design newsgroup.
>>  And what would we do the day D987 came out? Start another group called
>> digitalmars.d987-design? Or just create one called digitalmars.d.design,
>> and use that no matter the version of D being discussed?
>>  -- Simen
>
> How about digitalmars.dnext?

Maybe digitalmars.future? :)