OPTLINK needs to die.

Max Samukha samukha at voliacable.com.removethis
Tue Feb 17 04:54:09 PST 2009


On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:04:18 -0800, Walter Bright
<newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:

>Denis Koroskin wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:24:10 +0300, Walter Bright 
>> <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Danny Wilson wrote:
>>>>  Op Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:06:43 +0100 schreef Walter Bright 
>>>> <newshound1 at digitalmars.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> It does not crash when I try it. Are you sure you're not running a 
>>>>> multicore computer?
>>>>  It's pretty hard to _NOT_ get a multicore computer these days. 
>>>> Please kill OPTLINK.
>>>
>>> What I'm asking is for someone with a multicore computer who is 
>>> experiencing these crashes to try the patch I outlined to restrict it 
>>> to one core.
>> 
>> It is responded that three people (Tom S, Jarrett, Max Samukha) are 
>> running single-core machines and still experiencing constant crashes.
>
>It doesn't crash on my machine on *any* of the examples that produce a 
>crash on your machines. Can you please just try the patch anyway? It may 
>also be related to the hyperthreading on a single core machine.

Have you tried to link my example with /co as I asked you in my last
post here http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2436#c4 ?

It fails on AMD Athlon 1800, which is rather old. Changing the afinity
mask doesn't help 



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list