OPTLINK needs to die.

[Max Samukha]

On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:54:09 +0200, Max Samukha
<samukha at voliacable.com.removethis> wrote:

>On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:04:18 -0800, Walter Bright
><newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
>>Denis Koroskin wrote:
>>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:24:10 +0300, Walter Bright 
>>> <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Danny Wilson wrote:
>>>>>  Op Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:06:43 +0100 schreef Walter Bright 
>>>>> <newshound1 at digitalmars.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It does not crash when I try it. Are you sure you're not running a 
>>>>>> multicore computer?
>>>>>  It's pretty hard to _NOT_ get a multicore computer these days. 
>>>>> Please kill OPTLINK.
>>>>
>>>> What I'm asking is for someone with a multicore computer who is 
>>>> experiencing these crashes to try the patch I outlined to restrict it 
>>>> to one core.
>>> 
>>> It is responded that three people (Tom S, Jarrett, Max Samukha) are 
>>> running single-core machines and still experiencing constant crashes.
>>
>>It doesn't crash on my machine on *any* of the examples that produce a 
>>crash on your machines. Can you please just try the patch anyway? It may 
>>also be related to the hyperthreading on a single core machine.
>
>Have you tried to link my example with /co as I asked you in my last
>post here http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2436#c4 ?
>
>It fails on AMD Athlon 1800, which is rather old. Changing the afinity
>mask doesn't help 

"affinity" it should have been. Please don't ignore me because of my
grammer :)