Qt 4.5 to be LGPL

[Katrina Niolet]

Stewart Gordon Wrote:

> Bill Baxter wrote:
> > Qt 4.5 to be LGPL
> > http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09%2F01%2F14%2F1312210
> > 
> > Now we just need a D port...
> 
> There was Indigo, not exactly a port but a library to mimic Qt's API.
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/indigo/
> 
> But that import is incomplete at the moment - I'll have to see what code 
> I still have.  And maybe the project could be resurrected one of these days.
> 
> Stewart.

I'd say wait and see how the bindings work out. Long term a D port of Qt would be great, but it would take several developers years to get any real percentage of the Qt classes ported, and if the D bindings rock then there is little need (other than just the desire to have to have Qt in a more modern language)

Katrina